MyCommunityNOW.com
Blog Home |  Email Author  |        Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

Hunting Season

I've lived and worked in the Falls for many years. If they moved Miller Park to Appleton and Good Hope, I don't think I'd ever have to leave the village again.

American Idol-atry

By William Weaver
Tuesday, May 6 2008, 11:05 PM

So I was watching the Brewers on TV last night, and Suppan gives up a dinger right around 7:00 p.m.  Since I thought I knew where that game was going (remember Sup vs. the Cubs last week?), I flipped over to Fox News to catch "The Factor", but it was yet another Dem primary night.  I guess Fox has a journalistic duty to cover the Dems, but I, however, have no "blogalistic duty" to watch it. 

As it looked like the tube was not happening for me this evening, I went outside to check on how the boys were doing with finishing up the yard work (not great, but not bad).  Then I figured I'd best head downstairs to see what my youngest was doing.  And she was watching "American Idol".

Hey, if I was an 8-year-old girl, I'd probably be watching "American Idol" too.  But my first thought (and spoken question) was "Kaitlin, is your homework done?"  (It was - she's good about that).  My next thought was "how can this show still be on?"

OK Ok ok, yeah I watched this show during the first season.  I missed the first few weeks and only saw it from the "Hollyweird" portion where they thinned the field down to the finalists.  And then I saw every single elimination week afterwards.  (Yep, it's true, I was into the show).  It annoyed me to no end that the spiky-haired girl made it to the final three, but sometimes the voting public makes mistakes.  (Stumbled upon a classic set-up line there, didn't I?  Hmmm... 1992?  1996? ... lol!).

Anyways, I tuned in for the start of season two.  The so-bad-they're-good auditions, etc. and so forth.  But they futzed with the format a bit with the finalists, and again I found someone on the show that annoyed me to no end: that peroxide blonde cheerleader from Texas.  (If you look up "FAKE" in a recent illustrated dictionary and it doesn't have her picture next to it, return said dictionary to place of purchase for a full refund!).  I only flipped by the show now and then afterwards.  Season three rolled around, and I was done with it.

Despite MY lack of viewership, this show is a ratings monster.  Yet surprisingly I've seen headlines over the last few months about a possible "re-tooling" of the show.  Well, I just might have some thoughts on that.  A few common sense, a few "controversial", and a few so crazy they just might work.  All in all, they just might win me back as a viewer.

THE JUDGES:

1) Simon Cowell - stays.  It's your show, and you dish up much needed bowls of blunt truth to these kids.  Don't go changin'!  Pros: His record speaks for itself.  Cons: Might "mellow" with age.  But I doubt it.

2) Paula Abdul - gone.  You see the good in everything, even the most craptacular display of "I don't know how I got this far so I'll fake it and hope for the best!".  There may be a career in public education in your future (especially if you get in with the WEAC).  Replacement suggestion: Mariah Carey.  Pros: Might actually give constructive criticism (sometimes the truth hurts, but you can always learn from it).  Cons:  Might join the singers on stage and start our dog on a rampage with her high register overtones.

3) Randy Jackson - gone.  Dog, you are a successful producer and session musician, dog.  Stop saying "dog", dog!  Replacement suggestion: Little Richard.  Pros: He's Little Richard.  Cons: Absolutely none.

THE "ARTIST IN RESIDENCE":

I don't know which season they started this, but "American Idol" started having an artist-of-the-week or whatever, and the finalists performed said artist's songs.  Here's some suggestions for future "artist's in residence" (or whatever they call it):

1) The Ramones (which would have helped last night's Rock and Roll Hall Of Fame theme!).  Pros: You can't imitate or reinterpret the Ramones, so all performances will be at best "so-bad-they're-good" or just plain awful.  And there is entertainment value either way.  Also the wives and families of Johnny, Dee Dee, and Joey could probably use the performance royalties.  Cons: Tommy won't appear on the show, though Marky and C. J. will.  And Marky and C. J. will "play nice" with the contestants.  So I guess Paula's spirit lives on - but just for that one week.

2) Iron Maiden.  Pros: We'll see what vocal chops ya got now!  And Bruce Dickinson's critiques will make Simon look like - well, you can't "out-Simon" Simon can you?  Or CAN you?  Cons: Since they let the contestants choose the songs to perform, there is the chance you'll hear something off of "The X Factor" or "Virtual XI".  Ugh...

3) Alanis Morisette.  Pros:  Seems like a natural, with teen pop-stardom followed by critical and commercial success.  She's got chops and has written some good songs.  Cons: The song "Hand In My Pocket".  If there is music in H - E - double hockey sticks, this song is on a continuous loop.

THE CONTESTANTS:

Don't change a thing.  You'll be given a short leash, and when you stumble you'll hear about it.  Those that place high may do well.  The rest of the finalists might get one or two tries from a record company trying to make a quick buck.  If not, you might get a shot on another reality show.  Or you could get some cruise ship gigs.  (The missus does like her cruises, so expect at least one autograph hound...)

Comments

William Weaver   

My first comment - wah-hey!  Great blog!

May 7, 2008 8:06 PM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.

About William Weaver

I've lived and worked in the Falls for many years. If they moved Miller Park to Appleton & Good Hope, I don't think I'd ever have to leave the village again.
 
The opinions and views expressed by Community Voice writers do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Journal Interactive, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel or Community Newspapers. MyCommunityNow.com does not control, is not responsible for, and does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity or quality of, the postings on this Web log. Readers can report objectionable content by clicking here.

Posts

Your browser must support javascript to use the posts pager. Please enable javascript or return to the home page to page through posts.
Newer Older

Tags

Archives

Search the Blogs