MyCommunityNOW.com
Blog Home |  Email Author  |        Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

359 Degrees

Scott has lived in Brookfield for over 20 years and has been 5th District alderman since 2000. This blog will try to round out the views on Brookfield presented by so many others.

New Policy on Traffic Calming

By Scott Berg
Sunday, May 18 2008, 09:32 PM

One of the most common complaints an alderman gets is someone stating their neighborhood's traffic is too fast, too reckless, in too high a volume and that the situation is highly unsafe.  The Board of Public Works (BPW) adopted a new policy for "traffic calming" at its May 13, 2008 meeting.  The chief architect and champion of that new policy is 7th District Alderwoman Lisa Mellone, who placed it on the 2006-2008 City Strategic Plan and wrote about it on her blog.

I serve on the BPW and support the new policy.  The following is an overview.  I invite your comments!


Implementation

So, how do you get your street considered for this treatment?  The policy defines a process to be followed, roughly (see the link below for the complete policy) as follows:

  1. A resident makes a complaint and fills out an application describing it.
  2. The city staff determines if the complaint falls within the policy guidelines.  If so, continue on.
  3. Supporting data is collected.  That's the police speed trailer, accident history, etc.  If the objective data looks bad, continue on.
  4. Start the education and enforcement steps.  If the problem persists, continue on.
  5. Select an engineering solution.  e.g speed bumps, etc.
  6. Review of the proposal by BPW, budget for changes, give approval.
  7. Continue to monitor to see if the changes solved the problem.

There are several good reasons for this seemingly complicated process.  One is to make sure the problem is real, and not just an isolated incident.  Another is to place all complaints on an equal footing and eliminate unfairness (real or imagined) on which neighborhood gets consideration.  This deliberate process defuses many of the opposing arguments by weeding out the questionable cases.


Education

The first component of the policy is education.  The idea is to remind people what safe driving is and to involve the people most aware of the situation in its solution. First, yard signs can be placed with messages like "Slow Down".  Second, the police trailer that shows an oncoming car it's speed as measured by radar can be used.  That also collects objective data to document traffic volume, average speed, time of day patterns and generally raise awareness in the minds of those driving by.  Another possibility is to lend residents radar guns to measure the traffic speed for themselves so that they understand that a car going 25 mph might appear to  going be a lot faster when you're close to the road.


Enforcement

Station police patrols to monitor the traffic and write citations as needed. 


Engineering

If an area has a recognized problem with speeding traffic, the road can be physically modified in an attempt to slow it down.  Keep in mind that the following list is what other cities have done.  They would be constructed only in extreme cases and only after careful considerationSome may not be used at all in Brookfield.

  • Additional signs - Indicating the speed limit, asking for caution, warning of pedestrians. Simple and cheap, but easy to ignore.
  • Vertical deflection - That's engineer speak for speed humps.  A hump is like a bump, only not as tall and steep and thus not as jarring.  There are a few in Weston Hills in the southwest corner of the city.  Another version is the speed table which is sort of a speed hump but not as high and as wide as your car.
  • Horizontal deflection - More engineer speak for making the road curvy.  A good example is Norhardt Drive (west edge of Ruby Isle) where there is a curve in the middle, forcing traffic to slow down to see around it.
  • Bulb (bump) outs - Curbs extending into the street creating a narrow point.  You see these in the Brookfield Road Village area defining parallel parking spaces and corners.
  • Chokers - Make short sections of the road one lane to force one car to stop while a car heading in the opposite direction passes through. 
  • Street closure - Make a dead end, ending cut through traffic but forcing all the residents of that street to exit the neighborhood in one less way.

There are other, in my experience less popular, constructs such as traffic circles (mini-roundabouts for low volume locations) and chicanes (think zig-zag), but you get the idea.


Cost

Nothing is free.  Here are some ballpark cost estimates from the consultant.

  • Speed humps - $2,000 for several humps close enough to be effective.
  • Bulbouts - $7,000+
  • Partial (one way traffic) or full (dead end) closure - $120,000 for ripping out the pavement, planting grass, changing signs, etc.

Some cities will only implement traffic calming in a neighborhood if the adjacent residents pay for it.  It ensures people only pay for something that benefits their house and is a way of ensuring that neighborhood support is sincere.  Would you be willing to pay $100 for "your share" of the speed bump in the road in front of your house?  City assessments are treated like taxes.  Once the cost and affected area is determined, you must pay, whether you agreed with it or not.


 Official Policy - I know it's dry reading, but everything is there.

Policy adopted on May 13 by the BPW

Presentation by traffic consultant on February 19, 2008


Related Web Sites on Traffic Calming

Wikipedia entry on traffic calming.  A fair overview.

Traffic consulting firm's site on the topic.  Very similar to what Brookfield's consultant said.

Federal Highway Administration site on traffic calming


 An Opposing Viewpoint

There are some objections to traffic calming.  This is part of that other 359 degree of a debate that some blogs ignore because they don't agree with it.  I believe in a truly fair and balanced discussion before making a decision.  My affirmative vote speaks my decision after considering these points.

  • Fire trucks, ambulances and police cars have to slow down when they encounter them, even in an emergency.
  • The problem is not speed or recklessness, but heavy traffic.  These measures just chase the traffic into someone else's neighborhood, solving nothing.
  • None of this stuff is free.  Are you willing to pay for it?
  • How can you plow snow with all that junk in the road?
  • Cars running over speed bumps make a "thump" noise that wasn't there before.  Is it too noisy?  Does it ruin the car's suspension or tire balance?
  • Anything can be abused.  Two cars may reach a choker and "play chicken."  Speed bumps may be seen as a challenge.
  • I've lived on this street for 30 years and raised my kids here without a problem.  This is just some worry wart parents too lazy to supervise their kids properly.
  • Air pollution increases.  You slow down coming to the barrier, then accelerate leaving it rather than keeping a fuel conserving steady speed.

Americans Against Traffic Calming

Road Access for Disabled Americans

National Motorists Association

Filed under:
Permalink |  Mail to a friend

Comments

Santa's Elf   

"Chokers - Make short sections of the road one lane to force one car to stop while a car heading in the opposite direction passes through."

Now there's a real winner! Can you imagine a few dozen chokers in a city filled with three ton SUVs, each driven by an executive level "me first" yuppie?

The Council would be considering the building of fire stations four and five just to handle the resulting chaos.

Remember, Brookfield is a place where a STOP sign is an invitation to accelerate on through your right hand turn to assure that you'll beat oncoming traffic!

Frankly, what we probably need are randomly placed IED's triggered to blow when tripped by a vehicle exceeding the posted speed limit.

In Brookfield, that might be effective!

May 19, 2008 1:00 AM

mick   

Radar photo vans are being used in many cities. While I personally view them as just revenue generators, they will/do slow down traffic. A single van reasonably located in problem areas will "adjust" traffic flow. Most city policy requires that van locations be published daily so drivers are foretold and forewarned. Just another option to be considered.

Scott's reply:

Using photos for traffic enforcement is unconstitutional in Wisconsin.  That's why you never see the traffic signal "turning on a red light" cameras here.  As an advisory measure with no enforcement, it may be possible. 

May 19, 2008 10:04 AM

Brookfield1947   

just make the roads wider, that'll slow em down..not

May 20, 2008 6:25 AM

mikeyd   

I am personally against most of the 'calming' methods. Traffic bumps/humps are a bit of a nuisance as far as I am concerned as are most of the road narrowing and lane moving methods (i.e. North Ave. in tosa ~65th street). They make the roadway more hazardous and decrease a drivers view of the roadway.

I am one of the dads who will yell and run into the road behind a vehicle that is clearly exceeding residential speed limits as I have two young children who play in our driveway all the time.

I am strongly in favor of increased enforcement and police presence of all kinds in neighborhoods.

One idea I have is to start a website form at the Brookfield Police Department website where residents can report what they see as driving offenses. I know of two vehicles in particular that regularly fly through our residential neighborhood at over 40 mph each and every time  I see the vehicles go by, and they probably live in my own subdivision. I know it would never result in issuing a citation, but a letter could be sent to the vehicle owner indicating the problem if the report contained a tag number. Repeat offenses reported could result in an officer appearing at the front door to issue the warning and describe proper driving technique in person. I am sure there are parents that have no idea their children are driving their vehicles 40+ mph through the neighborhood, and some older drivers would slow at least on residential streets in their own neighborhood if they received an official notification. If this type of reporting could go on record so that when they are pulled over for a moving violation (and hopefully they will be, thinking most that drive so recklessly in the neighborhood probably do so even more dangerously on the larger roads), they would not get off with just a warning. If they know they have a mark against their record locally, that might cause them to regulate vehicle speed a little more stringently.

May 30, 2008 8:36 AM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.

Posts

Your browser must support javascript to use the posts pager. Please enable javascript or return to the home page to page through posts.
Newer Older

Tags

Archives

Search the Blogs