MyCommunityNOW.com
Blog Home |  Email Author  |  About this Blog       Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

Both Sides of the Fence

A Tosa resident since 1991, Christine walks the dog, raises kids, cooks but avoids housework, writes and reads, and works too much. A Quaker and The Aging Maven, she has been known to stand on both sides of the political and philosophic fence at the same time, which is very uncomfortable when you think about it. She writes about pretty much whatever stops in to visit her busy mind at the moment. One reader described her as "incredibly opinionated but not judgmental." That sounds like a good thing to strive for!

To WEDC or not to WEDC: that is the $95,000 question

By Christine McLaughlin
Friday, Sep 26 2008, 02:25 AM
Normal 0


Some of you may be surprised that I spent Thursday evening at the Wauwatosa Budget and Finance Committee meeting, when I could have been watching the season premiere of Gray’s Anatomy. I suspect I got the better entertainment value.

 

I went because I was curious about the Mayor’s move to pull the funding rug out from under the Wauwatosa Economic Development Corporation (WEDC) with no committee or public discussion, just budget line item adjustment fiat. There seems to be a lot of that going around in government circles these days. (In the interest of fairness, Mayor Didier says that she does not intend to eliminate the WEDC, just its funding. Its members say that will bring it to an end.)

 

I had no dog in the race, no opinions about whether the $95,000 in question would better serve Tosa in the WEDC, a public-private partnership to promote the city’s economic vitality,  or in the city Community Development department. This inquiring mind wanted to know why the Republican mayor is making government bigger and putting her faith there rather than in private enterprise.

 

And the guys at the dog park wanted to know “what do the business guys think?” What the business community wants would be the way to go, they suggested.

 

Fourteen audience members rose to speak. The business guys were the majority of the 13 articulate, thoughtful people on both sides of the political spectrum who spoke in favor of maintaining funding for the WEDC. They ranged from former mayor Maricolette Walsh to Mayfair manager Steve Smith.

 

Their message was pretty clear. Any decision to cripple or unravel an organization that was created to do what the city couldn’t do—go out and get businesses rather than “waiting for them to come in and ask for a permit” should be undertaken with thought, discussion, and a plan for replacing what has been 19 years in the building. There’s room for improvement and better cooperative effort, based on best development practices and finding out how the community wants to do development.

 

Then the fun began, hours of it.

 

6th district Alderman Brian Ewerdt wins the It’s My Committee, I Can Blame Who I Want To award for rather goofily criticizing WEDC for not following up on the multi-million dollar then-we-saw-it-now-we-don't Icon Development deal, which was cut mainly by the city with little communication to anyone outside the deal—including Ewerdt (the development is, or would be, in his district) or the WEDC.

 

The Lack of Accountability award goes to 2nd District Alder Jim Krol and Mayor Jill Didier, both of whom criticized the WEDC for not being accountable while apparently forgetting that they both sit on its board, in which position the Mayor has been able to wield her favorite vote of “present.”

 

District 3’s Jacqueline Jay wins the Why Can’t We Have a Sonics Here But Hey, No Spending Money award.

 

The Cities Don’t Do Economic Development Well But I’ll Vote to Have the City Do It Anyway award goes to 5th District Alder Michael Walsh.

 

The I’m in The Drivers Seat and You Aren’t award goes to Mayor Jill Didier, who said that the goal of this budget shift is to “change the dynamics and get everyone going in the same course.” That course has yet to be determined, but it involves hiring a consultant or business to “provide consistency.” WEDC might get there first, wherever there is, though, on account of they will be so much more nimble without funding. If you are having trouble following this course of reasoning you are not alone.

 

The I’m Jill Too award goes to 4th District Alder Jill Ogan, just because.

 

Tom (sorry: it was late) Peter Donegan, District 1, gets the At Least I Ask Good Questions Even If Where I Go From There Is Totally Bewildering award.

 

The next three awards aren’t tongue-in-cheek.

 

The Thank God for A Voice of Reason award goes to District 7 Alder Atis Purins, who pointed out that this discussion should have been started long ago; that the city’s “plan,” aka “the memo,” is not a plan; that the city should fund a study in cooperation with the WEDC to determine community development objectives and how to go about them; and that this should be about how to do economic development, not which side wins a power struggle.

 

Committee Chair and 8th district alder Craig Maher gets The Elephant in the Room Is That We Need More FTEs, Not Consultants, in City Development to Get the Work Done award. Maher, who noted that accountability and the lack of accountability cut both ways, moved to keep the budget line for funding City Development as the Mayor requested and also add $75,000 of funding for WEDC. This excellent proposal was shot down, as was Purins’ to fund a joint study to base the plan on evidence. With all the talk of collaboration, they were the only ones who actually proposed ways to do it.

 

Finally, the These Are Really Smart People, Maybe They’d Do Better With More Support, Too award goes to the past and present WEDC members in the room.

 

I’m thinking if you put Lisa Mauer, WEDC board secretary and president of Tool Service Corp., Community Development Director Nancy Welch; Maher; and Purins in the back seat to hash out details while Didier drove the van, you’d have your plan by the time they hit LaCrosse.

Comments

Tosamom   

Christine-

Excellent post and you seemed to capture all the nuances.  Too bad Didier doesn't get the importance of an entity like WEDC.  When can the recall start?

September 26, 2008 8:59 AM

MrWarrenAve   

I happen to agree with Mayor Didier, I am glad to see that she has the foresight to save the taxpayers our money.  If you want to attract businesses to Tosa, stop this silly granting of measely block grants...lower thier taxes, it's simple.  Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are two very important lessons in the socialist idea of a private/public entity, they never work.

September 26, 2008 9:16 AM

Tosamom   

I think the plan is to "shift" the funding from WEDC to the city.  Therefore, there is no savings.  I have no reason to doubt Christine's summation of the meeting.  Didier does not have a plan.

September 26, 2008 9:33 AM

Christine McLaughlin   

Thanks, Tosamom.

And MrWarrenAve, you may agree with the mayor but this move isn't going to save taxpayers money. The proposal shifts the money from WEDC to the city Community Development office and adds another $50,000. It avoids putting a new employee on the books by substituting a higher paid consultant or contract worker.

Just because someone says they are going to save you money doesn't mean they are going to do that.

One WEDC function is fundraising. And as someone at the meeting said (my paraphrase), "If you think that there are people out there in the business community just waiting to donate big money to government, you're not based in reality."

Economic development is an important task, maybe the most important task, these days. It brings in tax base and makes a community stronger. Creates jobs and makes the physical space safer than vacant buildings do. My guess is that WEDC needs to develop some different approaches and better outcomes--AND Nancy Welch's office needs some help--AND they need to work together.

Gotta spend money to make money sometimes.

September 26, 2008 9:44 AM

Thomas   

Good job Christine.

I had hoped to be there myself and chime-in but alas I had to work late.  

I’ve had to do a lot of that lately.  Yep, I even rolled-up my sleeves.

In the mayor’s eyes I’m probably just one of those business people and therefore don’t know anything about capitalism or complicated stuff like meeting a payroll and the like.  These are things the mayor knows how to do better since she’s, well, the mayor.  It says so on her letterhead.

I’m puzzled.  Since the mayor is one of these Americans for Prosperity people (blogs.wauwatosanow.com/.../tree-growers-americans-for-prosperity-carbon-credits-and-a-mayoral-candidate-yikes.aspx) how does she Defend the American Dream by turning over the business of growing business to government?  Strikes me as an uncomfortable contradiction of sorts, eh?

Well, enough of musings over his nonsense.  This is rather less complicated than you all make it out to be.  Come-on, haven’t any of you considered the obvious?  

Back to work.

Gas Pains

September 26, 2008 10:38 AM

Tosamom   

Thomas-

What's the obvious?

September 26, 2008 10:47 AM

community spirit   

Bang - did you hit the nail on the head -some very short sided thinking about some very long term ramifications.

September 26, 2008 11:00 AM

tosan   

Ms. McLaughlin,

WOW, you have a quick and accurate read on people!  Thomas--I am not quite sure what "the obvious" is.  I have been out of town a lot so maybe I missed something.  Are you referring to the fact that her husband is a developer, that she is quite the "control freak" or that she plans on taking credit for any business that ends up in Tosa????

September 26, 2008 2:31 PM

tosan   

Ms. McLaughlin,

WOW, you have a quick and accurate read on people!  Thomas--I am not quite sure what "the obvious" is.  I have been out of town a lot so maybe I missed something.  Are you referring to the fact that her husband is a developer, that she is quite the "control freak" or that she plans on taking credit for any business that ends up in Tosa????

September 26, 2008 2:31 PM

Christine McLaughlin   

Tosan, thanks for your kind words about me. I won't speak for Tom but I'm guessing that the obvious is his sign-off line, Back to work.

I don't have a problem with the mayor taking credit for good things that happen. I just want them to happen, and I think they will happen better by taking advantage of the WEDC's groundwork, contacts, and expertise.

September 26, 2008 3:31 PM

Thomas   

Nobody has figured-out the obvious yet?

‘Cuse me while I grab a length of 2x4.

Lessee..

The current director is former Mayor Estness

Former opponent is Alderman Stepaniak is quite influential on the WEDC

A bunch of independent –thinking business people supported Stepaniak in the last election

Maybe the mayor is a wee bit vindictive?   The claws come out for a bit of pay-back maybe?  Just a guess but you draw your own conclusions.

She wanted to poke the business community in the eye and take all the marbles and go back to the mayor’s office.

She has the vast experience of two years of being an alder without ever having run a business.  Now we’ll be entertained by how good she is at shooting marbles.

I’m not sure the mayor can really commiserate or identify with real business owners since she has led a rather sheltered life.  You know…never had to pull-up her own boot straps, hard work, hiring, firing, payroll, benefits, WI Dept of Revenue and all that other annoying stuff.

In my view you can chalk-up all of this silliness to inexperience.  

My advice to the mayor?   Better learn how to field-dress a moose really quick if you want to advance your political career.

There again - nobody ever listens to me.

Sigh….

Gas pains.

September 26, 2008 10:01 PM

nancy   

Nicely done, Christine.

September 27, 2008 12:01 PM

Hey Buddie...   

Thank you for some excellent reporting.  It sounds as if there are some personal agendas being played out in the council and a definite lack of understanding and knowledge of how to go about economic and community development.  I know what I'm talking about because I've got 37 years of community and economic development experience and the discussion that Christine reported above is played out every day across the country by politicians and political wannabes.  It's a losing proposition for the community.  Communities with successful economic development programs don't act this way.  Tosa's CDBG could be in jeopardy.  

September 27, 2008 8:12 PM

Peter Hart   

Is WEDC report on-line somewhere so we can look at it.

I guess what I am saying is what does the city get for $95,000?

September 28, 2008 6:53 AM

Tosamom   

Peter-

Expand your data collection sources.  Talk to someone else besides Didier.  I bet Stepaniak has a different take on this.

September 28, 2008 7:46 PM

John S.   

The September 25th Wauwatosa Budget and Finance Committee meeting has been on Public Access most of the weekend (Time Warner-channel 14).  With all due respect to Ms. McLaughlin’s characterization of our elected official, (if it is still possible) I challenge others to actually watch the show and form their own opinions.

September 28, 2008 11:56 PM

Christine McLaughlin   

John, I absolutely support your suggestion. Everyone should figure out for themselves what's going on, and that figuring out should be based on direct observation and research. I'm a blogger and my report is very subjective, and I intended it to be a little provocative.

I expected TosaNow to carry a reporter's account of this lengthy, important debate.

September 29, 2008 9:03 AM

Christine McLaughlin   

Mom, absolutely Stepaniak has a different take on this. His comments at the meeting were clear and thoughtful.

I'm most interested in what all the people in the middle, with less personal vested interest, have to say, though. I wish some of those who spoke at the meeting and who don't have a "team" commitment to either "side" would comment.

September 29, 2008 9:06 AM

Christine McLaughlin   

Peter, I'm not sure what report you are talking about. This was raised in TTS, and I didn't know there, either. WEDC had applied for a grant to do a study/report that was discussed at length at the meeting. It doesn't exist yet. So people are talking about some other report, I guess.

What the city would get for $95,000 (and the additional money requested) is the ability to hire consultants to do the work of 1) writing new zoning regs, something that needs to be done; and 2) the other work of helping developers through the process. I think.

September 29, 2008 9:11 AM

Calling it as I see it   

What has WEDC accomplished with our $95K?  I do not find that information in your opinion column that is simply a set up to bash people she doesn't like and gain cheap praise from her friends.

September 29, 2008 10:45 AM

Christine McLaughlin   

To find out what WEDC has accomplished, you should probably go to their website and talk to them, Calling It.

September 29, 2008 11:43 AM

CQSKENT   

Great report, I sent the following comments to Alderman Maher:

I sat through the 4 hr. discussion in the 9/25 Budget and Finance and do not wish to repeat opinions or ideas discussed as I think just about everything that could be said on the subject was discussed at great length.  I do have one question, however, that wasn't discussed or brought up and to me it was an obvious question or observation:  

We have a Community Development department that has professional and certified planners on staff, and we have a WEDC board made up of individuals who have a great deal of experience and interest in economic development.  Why do we need a $30,000 study by a consultant to tell us what is the best model for economic development?  Why has a department that has asked for additional staff for several years not developed a detail plan to use these additional resources?  If they are certified and have extensive experience in the field I would hope they would know what the needs are and how to fulfill them.

I find it hard to believe that between the WEDC board and city planning staff we cannot, on our own:

 1. Develop a listing of economic development needs and issues.

 2. Identify what actions or programs are required to fill these needs.

 3. Agree on who is/should be responsible for what.

 4. Evaluate current Community Development activities and tasks,

       - which are adding value, which are not.

       - which are redundant or can be assumed by other departments or

         personnel to free up planning staff time.  

 5. Identify additional resources needed and where best to put these

    resources

Economic Development is more then revising zoning or handing out money to attract/assist new development or redevelopment. The greatest need from my perspective, having recently gone thru the redevelopment process, is one of culture and environment change within city hall to make Wauwatosa "business friendly".  Handing out grants does not change this.  Without exception, anyone who has been thru this development process or has investigated opening a business has several horror stories related to their contacts with the city. We need to change the culture from one that says "no you can't do that" to one that says "how can I help you".

September 29, 2008 5:03 PM

Christine McLaughlin   

Thanks for sharing your comments with us, too, CQ.

September 29, 2008 8:21 PM

Old Tosan   

Christine nailed it (well done): Mauer, Welsh, Maher, and Purins could easily solve this.  Only change: let them do it alone rather than in Mayor Jill's van. She makes Sarah Palin look really ready for prime time.  

For the record: Old Tosan is a life long Republican.

September 29, 2008 10:00 PM

Tosamom   

I find the analogy to the van ride interesting.  Imagine Mayor Jill careening down the highway with no map (no plan). A good road map (plan) would help her avoid dead ends, bumpy roads, no thru streets and the dangerous road ending with a sign "Bridge Out."

September 30, 2008 1:19 PM

Ploopder   

i heard mayor didier on wuwm the other day during the lake effect suburban mayor series. she has no vision- zero- none. when asked about crime and business development on north avenue she said (paraphrasing) "we (the city) have to discuss opportunities with business so that they can take advantage of the opportunities there". what?! is that a strategy? please tell me- or more importantly the businesses- exactly what those opportunities are and what action items we can implement to get things rolling! i've heard nothing but empty happy-talk... sigh...

September 30, 2008 6:48 PM

Peter Hart   

"What the city would get for $95,000 (and the additional money requested) is the ability to hire consultants to do the work of 1) writing new zoning regs, something that needs to be done; and 2) the other work of helping developers through the process. I think."

I don't understand we hire WEDC (consultants) to hire consultants??

October 1, 2008 5:53 PM

Calling it as I see it   

"To find out what WEDC has accomplished, you should probably go to their website and talk to them, Calling It."

I could, but a writer who wants to deliver an intelligent, well-constructed argument instead of cheap-shot personal attacks would include that information in her article.

Since you know all the answers, how about you run for alderwoman or seek an appointment to the appropriate board instead of taking shots from the cheap seats?  Its this kind of mindless ranting that probably keeps many reasonable, thoughtful people from serving their community in these positions, why would they want to put up with a bitter old hag who has done nothing to earn her pulpit than email the guy who runs the website.

October 2, 2008 9:20 AM

Christine McLaughlin   

Pete, I though you were asking what the city would do if they transferred the $95,000 that now pays for WEDCs administrative expenses to their own budget. It's the CITY that would hire consultants, not WEDC.

October 2, 2008 9:27 AM

Christine McLaughlin   

Calling It, I included the link to the WEDC site in my blog.

I'm flattered that you think I know all the answers, but I'm much better at raising questions. It's much easier.

None of us here has "earned our pulpit." We are self-appointed blatherers. You too can speak from this vantage point if you want to, just by e-mailing Mark Maley.

October 2, 2008 9:33 AM

Calling it as I see it   

Wow, a LINK.  Yippee.  I am sure you read all the footnotes in a book instead of the actual text.  That totally excuses everything.

As long as you know you are a blatherer.

You're correct, it's easier to only question, criticize, and *** at those who live in our community and step up to the plate rather than help them seek answers and be part of the solution.

October 2, 2008 1:10 PM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.

Posts

Your browser must support javascript to use the posts pager. Please enable javascript or return to the home page to page through posts.
Newer Older

Tags

Search the Blogs