MyCommunityNOW.com
Blog Home |  Email Author  |        Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

Common Ground

A homeowner in Waukesha for 20 years, Steve is president of the Waukesha Dog Parks Organization and enjoys motorcycling, fishing and staying on top of politics.

Time To Up The Ante For Drinking?

By Steve Bukosky
Sunday, Sep 14 2008, 08:27 PM

News article about cost of prison and drunk drivers. If you didn't read the news article in the preceding link, please do. It affects every taxpayer in the city and the county.

I cannot express the grief that my son, our family and Jenn and Sophia and Courtney's friends and students have suffered since their death at the hand of a drunk that should never have been driving a vehicle that horrible day. Would it surprise you to know that upon reading that news article that I felt a twinge of shame? It is a double edged legacy that the Bukosky family name will be remembered for. The good edge is that lives of people will likely be saved. One of those lives could be you or someone you know. The bad edge is the cost of dealing with those refusing to drink responsibly.

I've written several blogs about being proactive. In one I expressed my frustration about people not picking up the cause of pro-activeness. So be it. However, I do not feel that you or I or any taxpayer should have to pay for more jail space or people to deal with the irresponsible drinkers. We've already created a precedent of dealing with smokers and the source of their addiction. Heavy taxes on cigarettes. Is the answer to further tax beer and alcohol? Perhaps, but it needs to be looked at further.

We read articles and news reports about drunk drivers. How often do we learn "the rest of the story"? Where did these criminal do their drinking? At home? At a tavern? At a restaurant? I challenge news reporters to ferret out that information. It will help formulate a tax relief policy of who should pay for dealing with drunk drivers. Where does the source of the problem begin? Taverns? Gas stations? Liquor stores? Restaurants? Should the offending type of establishments pay a much higher license fee? A special tax? Should they be shut down entirely if they sold product to a drunk?

I will begin the ante by suggesting a $1 per ounce tax increase on distilled liquors, 25 cents per ounce of wine and 5 cents per ounce of beer and ale products. The proceeds go for paying for increased jail space, enforcement officers and courts.

Never forget.

Comments

FivePoints   

You ask "where does the source of the problem begin?" It begins and ends with the person doing the drinking, that is it. What happened to personal responsibility.  It seems that people want to place the blame anywhere they can but one person and one person only is to blame: the drunk driver.  Not the bars, not the beer company, not the liquor stores.  Blaming taverns, gas stations, liquor stores and restaurants is a joke.  Once you buy a 12 pack how in the heck is the store supposed to monitor what you do with it?  I would think that a large number of drunk driving arrests are for people just over the limit, which likely means no bartender or waiter/waitress would have any clue as to whether a person is drunk or not either.

Why should the rest of us who responsibly enjoy beer have to pay for the irresponsible actions of others?  

September 15, 2008 12:04 PM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.

About Steve Bukosky

Began working in Waukesha County in 1966 and navigated the streets of Waukesha the next year when working for the Capital Drive Airport. I have owned a house in Waukesha since 1986 and my sons went through the city's school system. I am presently a heating and air conditioning technical representative for a company in Pewaukee.