MyCommunityNOW.com
Blog Home |  Email Author  |        Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

Conservatively Speaking

State Senator Mary Lazich (R-New Berlin) represents parts of four counties: Milwaukee, Waukesha, Racine, and Walworth. Her Senate District 28 includes New Berlin, Franklin, Greendale, Hales Corners, Muskego, Waterford, Big Bend and parts of Greenfield, East Troy, and Mukwonago. Senator Lazich has been in the Legislature for more than a decade. She considers herself a tireless crusader for lower taxes, reduced spending and smaller government.

Reasons for the state budget delay

By Mary Lazich
Sunday, Sep 30 2007, 07:53 AM

The non-partisan Wisconsin Taxpayers Alliance (WISTAX) has a report that attempts to explain the long delay in Wisconsin’s budget process. WISTAX says there are two obvious reasons for the stalemate:

“Two of these factors were prominent in three prior budget delays—one in 1971 and two in the 1990s. First, major disagreement over creation of a university system held up the first of the three budgets. Second, in all three cases, partisan control of the legislature was split, making compromise between the two houses difficult. Wisconsin is currently one of only 12 states with divided control.

This year, both issue differences and party politics are in play. The combination makes the 2007 budget unusually difficult to pass. Waged to an unusual degree on national rather than state issues, the 2006 election led state Republicans to lose three seats and control in the upper house and eight seats in the lower house. With U.S. politics largely unchanged from two years ago, Democrats sense an opportunity to expand their senate majority and to capture the assembly. Republicans, on the other hand, fear being shut out of state government leadership for the first time in a generation.

If one number best summarizes the current deadlock, then, it is 2-0-0-8. The political stakes are unusually high, and both major parties are aggressively positioning themselves for the next election. For Democrats, health care is both the banner under which they hope to run and the weapon they plan to use against their GOP opponents. For Republicans, tax hikes, mainly to fund expanded health care, are the issue they hope to use against Democrats. In a top-10 taxed state, they say Wisconsin taxpayers cannot bear proposed tax hikes. Whether the budget contains the tax/fee increases recommended by the governor ($1.75 billion, b) or by senate Democrats ($9.5b), the GOP views them as excessive.”

WISTAX also says the public and the pres are partially to blame for the budget impasse. You can read the entire WISTAX report here.

Comments

J-Rock   

Sounds like a lot of excuse-making.  What ever happened to the so-called party of "personal accountability"?

September 30, 2007 8:40 AM

J-Rock   

PS - while in a very technical, legal sense WISTAX is "non-partisan", meaning in exchange for tax-exempt status they are legally forbidden from endorsing political candidates, in practical terms WISTAX is as much non-partisan as unicorns are real.

September 30, 2007 8:46 AM

had to comment   

Republican's don't want to pay for things publically, they want everything to be private. Democrat's want to maintain strong public infrastructure and public control over things that private business does not do well. It's about that simple. The UW System and healthcare issues are just 2 of many items affected by this philosophy impasse.

September 30, 2007 8:48 PM

Josh Strupp   

That's definately a simplestic view but it's not that "simple".  You don't understand Republican principles if you think they don't want to pay for government services and programs at all.  Likewise, I think you will find more than enough funding for public infrastructure in this state, regardless of party affiliation.  

October 1, 2007 12:53 PM

had to comment   

I think these days the vocal Republicans we constantly hear from see any dollars spent on goods or services for the citizens as welfare. The mission is to reduce it or eliminate it. Public spending that will  help businesses is funded and often times over funded.

The above is not always true, just most of the time. Very little is always true or false. But I think we all know how Republican's like to do things, it's been quite obvious for the last 8 years at least.

Regarding public funding of infrastructure. Just look at our roads,electrical systems,school systems,bridges, etc.  and tell me again how we have enough funding for our public infrastructure.

October 1, 2007 6:34 PM

Josh Strupp   

We have some of the best roads in the country.  Our bridges aren't falling down last I checked.  I'm still trying to find where "school systems" are located in the transportation fund.  

Transportation is rumored to be raided on a regular basis to pay for other programs.  I wonder why that is?  Maybe it has to do with the HUGE pool of money available.

October 3, 2007 12:37 PM

had to comment   

The Hoen Bridge partially collapsed just a few years back. The interstate bridge between Wisconsin and Minnesota just collapsed. Recently a report was released regarding the condition of bridges across the nation, Wisconsin included, and it detailed all the bridges in poor condition.

I have driven across the country and our roads use to be pretty good. I don't believe that to be the case anymore.

I agree with you the transportation fund should not be used to fund schools. The money should go to fix our roads and bridges. But then we as a state need to find other monies to fund our schools. We are in a tax climate where nobody wants taxes to go up. The result is this raiding technique that has been going on.

October 3, 2007 6:13 PM

Josh Strupp   

The 35W bridge connects one bank of Minnesota with another.  Wisconsin is 20 miles east.

I drive 40,000 miles a year.  Wisconsin roads are some of the best in the country.

October 4, 2007 2:49 PM

had to comment   

I guess we will just have to disagree about our roads.

You can't deny the government has issued a report showing the significant state of disrepair the nations bridges are in.

I'll stand by my original comment that we are letting infrastructure go in our effort to avoid paying more in taxes.

October 5, 2007 5:23 PM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.