MyCommunityNOW.com
Blog Home |  Email Author  |  About this Blog       Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

Curmudgeon's Corner

cur-mud-geon: anyone who hates hypocrisy and pretense and has the temerity to say so; anyone with the habit of pointing out unpleasant facts in an engaging and humorous manner

Village Buzz - July 16th: Road Referendum This Fall?

By Al Campbell
Wednesday, Jul 16 2008, 08:48 AM

News reports indicate that Village President Tom Kempinski is considering asking the Board to approve a referendum that would appear on either the September ballot or the November ballot.  This referendum would deal with just how Germantown voters desire to fund some $2,000,000 per year in road repairs, if they desire to do so.  The choices apparently would be borrowing, increasing property taxes or a combination of both or none.

The referendum could be advisory or binding in nature.  Obviously, if advisory, the Board would then decide what, if any action it would take, but it would do so with some idea of the public's mood.  If binding, the results would stand as the electorate decided at least until the Board was reconstituted or until the Board found some other approach to achieve the end if that were possible.

If property taxes were increased by $2,000,000 annually, the increase in village taxes over 2008 would be some 20.5% without consideration for any other line item increases in the village budget. It is unrealistic to assume that all other expenses will remain constant.  If the amount were to be borrowed, the debt service would be part of the tax increase each year so that both the amount spent each year plus interest would be added to the tax bills over a number of years.

The village's portion of our total tax bill in 2008 was 24.52%; that share would climb to 30.67% if all other taxing units remained at 2008 levels which, unfortunately, is very unlikely.  The actual increase in total property taxes due to the village's portion of the total could be something in the range of 1% to 2% I would suspect.

Use of a referendum will please some people and anger others.  Some will say that this gives the voter the direct voice on specific items that they otherwise lack in representative government.  Others will say the referendum gives the Board a place to hide; still others will say that there should be no referendum.

There are several questions that come to mind about which you may wish to make your views known:

1.  Do we need $2 million worth of road repair every year?  For how many years?

2.  What portion of the village's road surfaces need to be repaired today? 

3.  Have past Boards avoided their responsibilities and not funded road repairs properly?

4.  Is a referendum a good idea or is it a convenient tool for a Board that doesn't wish to stake out a position that may be very unpopular?

5.  If this referendum appears on the ballot, what impact will that have on any issue the School Board may advance at the same time?

6.  If we are to see a referendum, should it be simply an advisory referendum or should it bind the Board to a specific direction?

What think you G'town?

Comments

Concerned GT Resident   

Once again, mismanagement at Village Hall results in asking for more.  Gee, I thought my property taxes were paying to have my roads maintained and repaired as necessary.  Silly me, actually, they were going to pay for a Taj Mahal Senior Center addition that was not needed, higher salaries and per diems for Village Board members, sweetheart loans to private developers, debt payments for un-needed and ill-advised TIF districts, etc.

Such mismanagement and poor decision making by our trusted leaders insures that we will continue to bounce around, in and out of holes in our local streets.  Keep up the good work guys.  Maybe after this you will have time to determine whether or not we should rename Mequon Road to Germantown Road.  Or better yet, pay somebody to study that option.

July 16, 2008 1:08 PM

POMO17   

CONCERNED GT RESIDENT

I just went back to April 08, and found you have alot to say. Some I agree with, some I do not. #1-If & when you may need the services of the "Taj Mahal Senior Center", please let me know-I would love to be the first to block  acess to you, I think it's the least we can do for our seniors, they after all have brought germantown to where it is today, just ask Charlie Hargan- he's done a tremendous amount for this community-

& #2- Since you are so well versed-why don't you put your name on the ballot !!!

July 16, 2008 3:58 PM

Al Campbell   

I received an email from Village President Tom Kempinski and wanted to provide quotes for clarification purposes:

From President Tom Kempinski:

"I have recently viewed your Blog in regards to the potential referendum for Road Improvements.

While I agree with most of what is written, I must point out that the Village Board is required to take the issue before the citizenry for approval of the increasing levy.  We are limited by the State in regards to exceeding our prior years levy.  We are only permitted to increase our levy by the amount of new growth %wise we incurred in the prior year.  I anticipate our growth going into this year's budget will only show about 2% increase.  By using either a 2% or 3% formula either percentages of increase will not give the Village adequate monies needed for road repairs.  Employee salaries could potentially take up the majority of either increase to the levy.

Over at least the past 8 years the Village Board has forced itself in making cuts to the Budget, in an effort of continuing down the path of striving to keep the tax rate down for the Village of Germantown residents.  State Shared Revenue has also declined significantly over the past 8 years.  Simply do more with less, a concept I along with many of my colleagues happen to embrace.

I have scheduled a Committee of the Whole for next Monday evening immediately after the Village Board Meeting, to discuss this issue and have the Village Board give direction to the General Government and Finance Committee to determine what the appropriate amount is needed for a continued road repair fund.  You have addressed most of the questions I wanted staff to investigate prior to presentation to the General Government and Finance Committee.  In closing, the 2 million figure was a number that was mentioned over the last couple of years, and I would hope a plan could be implemented where the amount would be considerably less."

July 17, 2008 6:31 AM

Irwin Fletcher   

A referendum is simply an easy way out for a board who wants to avoid making difficult decisions. Cut spending in certain areas and redirect the funds to roads. Pretty simple. Unfortunately the Village Board has found the funds to give significant salary increases to staff, a per diem to themselves (which appears to be being abused)and spending increases at rates greater than the rate of inflation to some departments.

So like the parent who has to tell little Billie that he cannot have the candy bar at the check out at Wal Mart, I will make it simple. No referendum is needed. Do your job, make the tough decisions and do what you should have been doing all along, maintain the roads. That may mean some staff layoffs or salary freezes but that is reality.

Deal with it, dont push your responsibilities off to others.

Irwin Fletcher

July 17, 2008 9:08 AM

Concerned GT Resident   

POMO17,

My criticism of the decision to spend more money on an elaborate addition to the senior center does not in any way criticize the seniors themselves.  That's a ridiculous way to defend that piece of questionable spending.  By that line of thinking one could assume that those who opposed the new elementary school were somehow being disrespectful of those students who could bring so much to the future of Germantown.

I don't think the Village has any more of an "obligation" to providing a space for seniors to congregate and get healthy meals than it has an obligation to provide certain amenities for its junior citizens.  It's great that we have that facility, but I personally don't believe such a massive expansion was necessary.

If the Village Board can make that decision on their own, why can't they make the decision to improve our pathetic roads in the Village?

Gee, I'm flattered that you went back to review all of my opinions.  Keep in mind they are "my opinions" and you don't have to agree with them.  That $140,000 the Village is spending on the parking lot at the Public Works building would certainly help on some of our worst streets, but you're right, I guess I can't express my opinion unless I'm on the Village Board.  The very same Village Board that wants everybody else to decide if our roads are bad enough to fix.

July 17, 2008 1:04 PM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.