MyCommunityNOW.com
Blog Home |  Email Author  |  About this Blog       Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

Curmudgeon's Corner

cur-mud-geon: anyone who hates hypocrisy and pretense and has the temerity to say so; anyone with the habit of pointing out unpleasant facts in an engaging and humorous manner

Who Is Gwen Ifill & Is She Biased?

By Al Campbell
Wednesday, Oct 1 2008, 11:44 AM

The debate between Joe Biden and Sarah Palin on Thursday evening is scheduled to be hosted by Public Television's Gwen Ifill.

It has just been disclosed that Ms. Ifill is a supporter of Barack Obama and has a new book titled "The Breakthrough" scheduled to be released in January, 2009 at about the time our new President will be sworn in to his position.  The book promotes Barack Obama and other black politicians who have benefited from the civil rights movement.  It contends that the civil rights movement, and the black political structure that resulted, has cleared the way to permit an Obama to ascend to the presidency.

Does it seem to you, as it does to me, that her selection as moderator of the debate between the two candidates for Vice President provides us with a biased moderator?

This is yet another example of how the media is stacked against conservatives, and I find it a telling indictment of that very media for allowing something this obvious to be permitted.

The classic question we conservatives have learned to ask is this:  If this were a news person who had written a book lauding John McCain, would he or she be selected to moderate this debate?

The answer which simply doesn't vary no matter the question is:  No way!

Will there be some disclosure in the public interest prior to the debate?  Not likely unless provoked by one or the other of the candidates.  I have read elsewhere that some are encouraging Sarah Palin to point this out at the beginning of the debate in a gentle manner at least to have it on the record.

Comments

Denny Crane   

Al, I do not believe this was "just disclosed" as evidence points to the contrary.  For example, this conservative website posted the schedule well over a month ago:   www.redcounty.com/.../presidential-and-vice-presiden

Additionally, Random House books issued a press release on this book months ago.  Why all the flap now rather than when the debate schedule with moderators included was released awhile ago?

I fear all the publicity will help this woman sell more copies of her book.

October 1, 2008 8:38 PM

Charlie Hargan   

I think the reason there is such controversy about it now is because very few people go all over the internet searching for stuff like this and even fewer read press releases from Random House Publications. When it ends up on the news, talk shows or TV, then is when the majority of people hear about it and many other things are learned the same way.

October 3, 2008 4:28 PM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.