MyCommunityNOW.com
Blog Home |  About this Blog       Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join
Browse By tag All Tags » Germantown » Potpourri » Education (RSS)

Related Tags

Random Subjects...

By Al Campbell
Saturday, May 31 2008, 07:18 AM

Nicole Sell...

What a miracle this 16 year old's recovery from a gunshot wound to the head is to behold.  It is nothing short of an act of God that she continues to live with us in this place.

I hope the sheriff's department will be relentless in its efforts to locate the person or persons responsible for this near-tragedy.  Someone knows something, as is almost always the case.  That someone needs to step forward and enable the authorities to close the file on this case.

Kenneth Rogers...

The new superintendent of Germantown Schools will take his new position on July 1st.  Now the superintendent of the Eleva-Strum Schools, he'll be moving to our community soon.  Welcome Mr. Superintendent.

I hope you will be able to work closely with the elected school board members while you breathe new ideas and approaches into our district.

Allan Kehl...

Another politician gets caught with his hand out, and has entered guilty pleas to federal charges that he took $15,000 from Dennis Troha of Kenosha.  Worse yet is the fact that Kehl is the former Kenosha County Sheriff.  He maintains, of course, that this money didn't influence his thoughts about the gaming casino Troha was trying to get established.  Sure Allan, we believe you...sure we do.

Newsweek...

We can all relax now that Newsweek has declared the debate on global warming to be over.  Here I was thinking that an honest, earnest debate had yet to begin on the subject, but I must've been wrong.

Certainly this liberal bastion of a magazine couldn't have misinterpreted all the evidence.  Oh, that's right...we really don't have any hard evidence yet do we?

Charles Krauthammer has a great column in the Journal Sentinel this morning if you're interested.


 

Health Care Cost 'Crisis'...

By Al Campbell
Monday, Jan 14 2008, 09:45 AM

Seemingly everytime we pick up a newspaper or periodical we see that health care costs have risen again.  The only real question anymore is 'How Much?'.  Of course, if we still have health insurance, the premium rates continue to go up and up.  What in the world can we do about this?  Would statewide mandatory insurance coverage do the trick?  Can we somehow legislate lower insurance premiums?  Are the drug companies really the culprits?  Maybe we simply need to move to Canada or Europe.

Recent studies show that our national health care spending increased in 2006 by 6.7% to $2.1 trillion.  That means that one out of every six dollars spent in our national economy goes for health care.  The 'good news' in this staggering number is that this is actually slower growth than we saw for 2005.  Apparently we're going in the right direction, even if too slowly.

Another amazing fact, to me at least, is the amount of 'out-of-pocket' spending each of us averages after insurance premiums, etc.  In 2006, we spent, on average, 12% out-of-pocket for our health care expenses.  Know what we spent out-of-pocket in 1960?  We spent 47% out-of-pocket for health care expenses. 

That means that we are shielded to a much greater degree today from our real health care costs than we were in 1960.  Our out-of-pocket costs have decreased steadily since 1960.  We are often at the point today where we think of the cost of health care as being the $10 or $20 co-pay we have to come up with when we go to see the doctor.  Or, the $20 or $30 dollars we have to cough up for medicines.  Those amounts are very small percentages of the total costs.

Why is this important?  It is important because we need to think about what we're spending if we're ever going to be able to bring this cost spiral under control.  If we come to understand that the real cost of the doctor visit is in the range of $125 to $150 or more, we can begin to understand that maybe we shouldn't be running to the doctor everytime we have a runny nose or a cough.

Another very interesting fact is this:  more than 50% of all health care claims costs in America today are to cover lifestyle-related illnesses.  Those are the things that you and I can control to one degree or another.  But, we can't control them if we don't know about it or if we choose not to do anything about it.  What are 'lifestyle' issues?  Smoking, alcohol use, obesity and simply laying around doing no exercise.

Does this apply to us?  Here are the most current facts:  One in every four Americans eat fast food every daySix of ten Americans do not exercise or seldom exercise!  Two of every three Americans are classified as either overweight or obese!

This is the real source of our health care cost crisis.  We have met the enemy and it is us!

No mandatory state programs, or profit controls on drug companies or anything else is going to solve this problem.  The simple truth is that this is up to us.  All the rest of these proposals are simply pablum calculated to make us feel good.

That is why this 'stuff' is flowing from the mouths of politicans.  And it does nothing to solve the problem!

Let your politicians know that you understand this.  If they really want to help us, they'll begin an educational program using some of the 'smoker money' to get the true message out.  And, be sure to tell them we do not want laws banning fast food or drinking or smoking.  We need to take responsibility for ourselves.  No one else can do that for us.  The marketplace will make its own corrections just as you've begun to see with the menu changes going on in the world of fast foods, for example.

Maybe if insurance companies were permitted to charge people what we deserve to be charged based on our lifestyle habits, we'd begin to see these changes occur.  If I smoke, I pay more.  If I'm overweight, I pay a surcharge.  Make me feel my wallet lightening up if I don't take personal responsibility (just don't think this is your new way to raise taxes). 

Don't just continue to blame big health, or big drugs or big insurance!  You are doing nothing but pandering when you resort to this, and we're on to you!


 

Full-Day Kindergarten...

By Al Campbell
Thursday, Jun 21 2007, 09:33 AM
My true curmudgeonly nature is about to be re-exposed. Is there a space problem in our Germantown Schools or is there a full-day kindergarten problem? If we had no full-day program, we would have no issues with a lottery, and I doubt any issues with space.

I can actually remember some of my year in kindergarten. I remember milk with graham crackers, lying on a rug for the requisite nap, sandboxes, recesses, stories being read to me and being scolded if I didn’t play well with others. I obviously had no choice but to attend half-day kindergarten. It did help greatly in my socialization…although you could argue that I need remedial help.

I may be a bit warped, but I doubt that can be assessed as the fault of having had only a half-day in kindergarten at the age of five.

Full-day kindergarten strikes me as a panacea for parents since day care rates in Germantown for half-days at a local day care center are shown at $132.50 per week. At 36 weeks of school, that has a cost of $4,770 per kindergarten child.

If my children were of kindergarten age, and if both I and my wife worked outside the home, you can bet I’d be all in favor of saving nearly $5,000 per year on day care costs while my child was safely engaged inside the kindergarten classroom.

Does a full-day actually benefit the child more than a half-day? I seriously doubt that there is any measurable favorable impact. The article in the current Germantown Now print edition mentions that, “the curriculum is the same in both half-day and full-day” according to Cynthia Coley, Director of Curriculum and Instruction for the Germantown District. She went on to say, “…the obvious advantage of full-day is that they have a longer time to investigate and explore those concepts”.

I understand that the student has a longer time to investigate and explore, but I don’t think the attention span of the average five-year old really permits their attention over such a time span.

Does full-day kindergarten cost the taxpayer more money than half-day. The obvious answer is yes. I don’t know if the state gives districts more for a full-day student than a half-day student. I would not be surprised if that were the case. I do know that teachers have either been stretched to cover these hours or that teachers have been added to cover these hours, or a combination of both. I do know that there is some operational cost impact.

No matter the answers to these hypotheticals; full-day kindergarten costs more; full-day students’ parents benefit more; the taxpayers suffer more. Why are we tasked to help offset day care costs for parents?

 
More Posts