|
By Al Campbell
Wednesday, Jan 7 2009, 02:40 PM
Village Board Races...
The trustee positions that are up for election in the spring (Tuesday, April 7th) and the people who are candidates are as follow:
District 1: Incumbent Michael Bech not running.
Bill Steitz vs. Terry Kaminski
District 2:
Jim Langer (Inc.) vs. Dan Wing
District 3:
Al Vanderheiden (Inc.) vs. Dennis Meiers
District 4: Incumbent Art Zabel is unopposed.
~~~~~~~~~~
School Board Races...
The board positions that are up in the spring and those who are declared candidates include:
At-large Seat 1:
Jayson Stemo, Shad Young and Kim Fischer
At-large Seat 7:
Tom Bowe (Inc.), Robert Banner III, Brian Palzkill and Erin Jex
A primary election will be held on Tuesday, February 17th with the top two vote getters in each race moving on to the spring election to be held on Tuesday, April 7th.
~~~~~~~~~~
We will see new faces on both the Germantown Village Board as well as on the Germantown School Board. It is good to see that only a single seat is uncontested. Obviously Art Zabel must be seen as unbeatable and that is fine, but it is good to see fresh blood in the game every so often. That tends to keep everyone a bit more on their toes than might otherwise be the case.
~~~~~~~~~~
Finally, if you've not visited the Village of Germantown website recently, take a look at the newly refreshed site.
|
By Al Campbell
Wednesday, Nov 19 2008, 02:44 PM
Surprise, Surprise...
I'm sure this must come as a great shock to us all.
The Wisconsin Technical College System Board voted 12-0 in favor of denying the petition request made by the Germantown School District to be permitted to leave the MATC district and move into the Moraine Park Technical College district.
We'll just have to shut up, pay our exorbitant MATC tax load and wait for another twenty years and try again.
In a very selfish way, I can at least look forward to many more opportunities to ridicule the MATC decision-making apparatus as well as the silly ways this group finds to divest themselves of our money.
When will we have a state government that wakes up to the folly of none-elected (appointed) boards that have taxing powers. This is truly taxation without representation...and there seems not a thing we can do about it.
Maybe current MATC President Darnell Cole will eventually find another school that is willing to take him off our hands; I feel confident that he'll continue to look for more money and more people to tax. After all, the goose that is called the MATC district is just about finished laying larger eggs. I wonder if technical colleges also have powers of annexation? That wouldn't come as too great a surprise, either.
I also wonder if we'll see more "free" laptops being donated to the library; and if we'll see that "splendid" cooperation between our industry and the MATC get even better. We'd probably be wise to not hold our breath until that occurs.
~~~~~~~~~~
Knodl Konundrum - Chapter Two...
Dan Knodl has entered a plea of not guilty in Ozaukee County to the charges lodged against him over names published without the permission of those named.
I suspect that, at worst, he'll be fined a modest amount and life will go on.
I have to say, though, that I'd be very embarrassed if that were my campaign and I let that happen when I would've known I had a comfortable lead in such a dominant Republican stronghold.
~~~~~~~~~~
Mequon Road/Pilgrim Road Intersection Construction...
It seems that the construction in this main intersection in Germantown has gone on longer than had been expected. I certainly hope this ends very soon so the roadway and traffic patterns can be restored prior to the Winter weather descending upon us.
|
By Al Campbell
Friday, Nov 7 2008, 02:15 PM
Sendik's Food Market 60 Days Later...
I have yet to encounter a Sendik's associate who wasn't happy to be there and who wasn't happy to help me.
I have noted that the facility remains bright and cheery with a very clean floor, which I thought might be problematic given carpeting. Winter will be a bigger challenge. Shelves are always fully stocked; delicious samples are scattered throughout the store.
I don't know about you, but I am happy Sendik's selected Germantown as the site for one of their beautiful grocery facilities.
~~~~~~~~~~
Veterans Day 2008...
Remember that the 2008 Veterans Day ceremony will be held at the Veterans Memorial at the corner of Freistadt Road and Park Avenue on Sunday, November 9th at 10:30AM. If you've not seen the memorial, it is worth your time.
A little history...
Veterans Day was originally known as Armistice Day when proclaimed by President Woodrow Wilson for November 11, 1919 to celebrate all veterans of World War I. It finally became known as Veterans Day on November 8, 1954 when Congress amended the act to change the name and to have the day honor all veterans who have served their country. The President was Dwight D. Eisenhower.
The American Legion will also conduct a flag disposal ceremony following the program so that you can properly dispose of any torn, tattered and/or faded American Flag you may have.
~~~~~~~~~~
County Supervisors Cut Property Tax Levy...
The supervisors agreed to take half of the county's sales tax revenue into the operating budget for 2009.
Unfortunately, this budget cuts the $35,000 for the County Convention and Visitors Bureau and cuts $15,000 from the Fair Park. The Village of Germantown is working to assist the Convention and Visitors Bureau since it receives significant promotion from that organization and felt that the funding cut by the county would have consequences for the community and its merchants.
The county set a 2009 tax rate of $2.71 per $1,000 which is down about $0.10 per $1,000 from this year.
~~~~~~~~~~
SRO Officer In Schools...
I had the pleasure of meeting SRO Tim Miller during the Citizen Police Academy session this past Wednesday evening. He gave us an overview of his duties in the schools and discussed the changes that have been brought about since this program was initiated. "SRO" means School Resource Officer. The SRO is a sworn officer and funding for this position is paid jointly by the school district and the police department on a 75%-25% ratio, respectively.
Our high school is a much quieter place of learning than before the initiation of this program several years ago. Student fights seldom occur now; the SRO has formed relationships that help both students and administration. And, students develop, I suspect, a much different view of police officers having had this experience. The SRO is available for class instruction whenever the subject matter entails. SRO Miller, in this case, can 'tell it like it is' during driver education and health classes, for example.
This strikes me as a very good use of taxpayer dollars that provides both a current payback as well as future benefits.
|
By Al Campbell
Thursday, Nov 6 2008, 09:29 AM
GEA Members Protesting...
I have learned that teachers in Germantown, members of the Germantown Education Association, are apparently protesting by wearing black clothing, or black armbands and pins over their lack of a contract that expired a few months earlier.
The offer from the Board/Administration was in accordance with the QEO (qualified economic offer) rules still in effect in Wisconsin that cite a maximum of 3.8% compensation increase including benefits according to my information.
I Blogged yesterday about the QEO going away in Wisconsin given Democrat control and WEAC support.
Could this be the first salvo in that battle? Is it just coincidence that this occurs the day after the election, or is it part of well-planned scenario to force that issue sooner rather than later.
~~~~~~~~~~
GOP Voter Turn-Out Down In Washington County...
I learned from an benefits industry newsletter this morning that voter turn-out on the GOP side of the race for president were off from the most recent similar race.
Washington County showed 50,641 votes for Bush in 2004 while there were a total of 47,725 votes cast for McCain. Waukesha County showed 9,837 fewer votes for McCain versus Bush in 2004, and Ozaukee County reported 2,744 fewer votes for McCain versus Bush.
Given the intensity of the campaigning and other races that were involved, this would seem to suggest that conservatives were really 'put out' over being forced to cast votes for the least desirable of the Republican candidates that started the race.
These three counties are solid conservative counties typically. Maybe this was a backlash or maybe there were more casual Republican voters who were swayed to cast their ballots for Obama because they liked him rather than as a protest of their selection.
~~~~~~~~~~
MATC Response Opposing The Germantown School District Petition Filed...
A 54 page response is available for your review on the MATC website if you like. I've gleaned some of that information as follows:
-
"MATC offers the highest quality and greatest variety of programs and learning opportunities in the most diverse college in Wisconsin. Germantown has benefited enormously from MATC's resources."
-
"As discussed below, reorganization would certainly not be in the best interests of the hundreds of Germantown residents who attend MATC, utilizing programming and coursework that is unavailable at Moraine Park."
-
"...Germantown has not presented any compelling reason to sever its productive, long-standing relationship with MATC and realign Germantown with Moraine Park. To do so would-in effect-place an unfunded mandate upon MATC by reducing its revenues without any corresponding reduction in costs. Programming and enrollment data strongly suggest that Germantown residents will continue to attend MATC and utilize its resources, even if reorganization occurs."
This could, and does, go on and on through the course of the 15 page letter signed by the MATC President, Dr. Darnell E.Cole, and the MATC Board Chairperson, Lauren Baker.
It asserts that there is no real reason for the petition other than our desire to get out from under the $5.7 million annual tax burden (that MATC fails to acknowledge has climbed exponentially over time). It complains that the sole reason for the petition is financial and it says that isn't permitted as a reason for consideration.
I was struck by the fact that MATC can decry the petition on the basis of the financial havoc that would be visited on MATC but the citizens of the school district are denied the same opportunity.
MATC brags about the unique courses available, and the commuting distance differences.
That rings hollow to me since there has been no indication that Germantown students, as few as they are in total number, are seeking out MATC for those "unique" courses. The discussion of "distance" rings hollow for me since I can drive "more quickly and more easily" from Germantown to West Bend than to either the Mequon campus or the downtown campus.
MATC points out the $2.7 million investment made in the Mequon campus over the past ten years but fails to acknowledge the $40 to $50 million in taxes paid by us citizens over that same time span. Again, the point of money is made by MATC but cannot be used to defend the petition.
MATC says it would have to engage in "substantial" program/job cuts" if the petition were to be approved. What a novel idea for this organization contrasted with the endless tax increases that have been and will continue to be levied. Once again, they can use the fiscal fact set they create to defend against our petition but we cannot use the fiscal fact set we create to auger in favor of our petition.
I have long maintained that the likelihood of a ruling favorable to the Germantown School District in its petition to move to Moraine Park was a long shot, at best.
Reading the story put together to defend the poorly run MATC organization makes me ill, as it also helps me see that the likelihood of a favorable ruling is probably much more remote than I had ever supposed.
This is such a classic case of a non-elected governmental body with taxing authority being judged by its own parent to the detriment of us citizens. This simply has to change...but that isn't going to happen for the time period during which the Democrats control state government. I'd simply better come to understand that and forget trying to tip windmills.
|
By Al Campbell
Tuesday, Nov 4 2008, 08:40 AM
Wow, voting day is finally here and my telephone will quit ringing so much, my mailbox will be less cluttered and I can either celebrate or cry in my proverbial beer. This election 'season' has seemed to go on forever. Several things are at top of mind this morning...
Milwaukee Police Unit Disbanded...
The special investigative unit of the Milwaukee Police Department that generated the 67 page election fraud report has apparently been disbanded some five days prior to today's election. The detective who led that operation has, according to the Wall Street Journal, been relegated to the sidelines today. John Fund of the Wall Street Journal reported this morning that Detective Michael Sandvick had predicted that Wisconsin could see as many as 55,000 illegal votes cast. He cited the cross-border flow from Minnesota and Illinois since Wisconsin is one of only eight states that have 'same day' registration coupled with the weak verification of eligibility. His estimate was that as many as 30,000 votes could be cast today in that manner.
There are only two people of whom I'm aware who could've caused this 'stand down' and those are Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett and/or Police Chief Flynn. Neither has been available for interviews today to my knowledge.
~~~~~~~~~~
My Voting Site...
I drove past the site where I vote at about 7:20AM today and was astounded at the number of vehicles parked and at the length of the line of people waiting to move into the building to vote. I plan to vote in the 9:00AM range and we'll see if this surge was simply caused by people on their way to work as I suspect.
At any rate, it certainly seems that our voter turn-out will be in the range predicted by the Village Clerk's staff which I recall was in the 73 percent range.
On top of this was an inordinately high number of absentee ballots being cast based on my casual observations of parking lot loads during the preceding couple of weeks and of anecdotal comments from people working in village hall.
UPDATE: I voted at about 9:20AM and was number 580. The people were still streaming in and there was about a ten minute wait at that time.
~~~~~~~~~~
Media Hype...
I am angered with what now seems to pass for the mainstream media so far as their seeming promotion of Obama's 'inevitable' victory.
We have been fed the 'facts' for many days that there is no way for McCain to win. There are, unfortunately, too many voters who are swayed by this 'stuff' and who don't think for themselves. If just 1% of potential voters were dissuaded from 'wasting' their time voting, the swing could become a 'self-fulfilling' prophecy.
~~~~~~~~~~
Direct Legislation...
Finally, we are witnessing direct legislation in Milwaukee concerning mandatory sick days from employers. This would create a burden for many businesses that would force them to close or move thus negatively impacting the residents. But, there are too many who can't or won't think these issues through and simply vote because they like the idea that they can have sick days.
We are witnessing some 25 to 30 communities across the state that have ballot questions concerning 'mandatory health care plans similar to those afforded state employees'. These types of issues are done at the state level but grass roots groups have begun to work at the local levels to bring some pressure to bear on state legislators. The simple fact is that there isn't enough money in the state to provide that level of health care coverage for all the residents. We would bankrupt ourselves.
Having family members in Colorado, I am reminded of the folly that those voters are subjected to in the form of ballot initiatives. There are something on the order of fifty individual questions on ballots in Colorado today that require some real effort to understand. The majority of voters do not take the time to do their own research and, instead, follow the direction of their associations or unions or professional affiliations.
This is a very dangerous thing, in my opinion, that lends some credence to the old saw about us voters getting the government we deserve.
|
By Al Campbell
Friday, Oct 31 2008, 10:25 AM
Trick or Treat from 5:30PM to 7:30PM...
Please remember that the little witches, ghosts and goblins will be out and about throughout the village tonight and that they cannot always see well through their masks or costumes.
~~~~~~~~~~
MATC Secession Public Hearings Set...
The Wisconsin Technical College Board has two meetings set for the near future at which citizens can testify for or against the petition filed earlier by the Germantown School District to be permitted to move from the MATC district into the Moraine Park district.
Those meetings are to be held on Tuesday, November 11th at two different times in two different Menomonee Falls locations. The first is from 2PM to 5PM and is to be convened at the Menomonee Falls Public Library; the second is from 6PM to 8PM and will be held at the Menomonee Falls Community Center.
The chances for a favorable ruling are likely slim already given the history that prevails. Public testimony on issues regarding access and class selection, for example, might help tip the balance. Remember that tax rates are not something the Board will take into account in reaching its conclusion.
~~~~~~~~~~
Special Board Meeting Results Unknown...
The village trustees met behind closed doors last evening for the following stated purpose:
Adjourn into closed session under Wis. Stats. 19.85 (1)(c) considering employment, promotion, compensation or performance evaluation data of any public employee over which the governmental body has jurisdiction or exercises responsibility; (f) considering financial, medical, social or personal histories or disciplinary data of specific persons, preliminary consideration of specific personnel problems or the investigation of charges against specific persons except where para. (b) applies, which, if discussed in public, would be likely to have a substantial adverse effect upon the reputation of any person referred to in such histories or data, or involved in such problems or investigations; or (g) conferring with legal counsel for the governmental body who is rendering oral or written advice concerning strategy to be adopted by the body with respect to litigation in which it is or is likely to become involved
A deductive process would reasonably suggest that this closed door meeting pertained to the issue of the alleged sexual harassment recently brought to light. I know of nothing else that would seem to fit the descriptions provided in the Wis. Stats. section above. There were allegations that could be damaging. There is an employee involved. The employee apparently had threatened legal action if she felt wronged by actions of the Board so far as her position was concerned.
Some three weeks have passed since the story broke, the citizens have no more information than at that time, and don't yet know what is going on. It seems that there must be something happening, since the Village Board passed its unanimous statement of support for President Kempinski. It looks as though the Village Attorney was likely in attendance, as one would expect.
Village Administrator Schornack stated, according to a small piece by Tom Kertscher on the GermantownNOW site, that he would be informing trustees about a personnel issue and that the trustees would not be taking any action.
I certainly hope that we'll all be privy to what has been going on and what may be expected in the future before too much more time has passed.
|
By Al Campbell
Wednesday, Oct 15 2008, 02:38 PM
I had intended to scan a copy of the sample ballot for Germantown however that wasn't sufficiently legible. So, we'll list the offices for which there are candidate selections to be made by all of us who are registered to vote in the village.
You may elect to vote a straight ticket including, in the order found on the ballot:
-
Democratic
-
Republican
-
Wisconsin Green
-
Libertarian
The race for President and Vice President, in the order found on the ballot:
-
Barack Obama/Joe Biden (Democratic)
-
John McCain/Sarah Palin (Republican)
-
Cynthia McKinney/Rosa Clemente (Wisconsin Green)
-
Bob Barr/Wayne A. Root (Libertarian)
-
Brian Moore/Stewart A. Alexander (Socialist Party USA)
-
Gloria LaRiva/Robert Moses (Party for Socialism, & Liberation)
-
Ralph Nader/Matt Gonzalez (Independent)
-
Chuck Baldwin/Darrell L. Castle (Constitution Party)
-
Jeffrey J. Wamboldt/David J. Klimisch (We, the People)
-
Write-in________________
Representative in Congress District 5, in the order found on the ballot:
State Senator District 8, in the order found on the ballot:
Representative to the Assembly District 24, in the order found on the ballot:
District Attorney:
County Clerk:
Treasurer:
Register of Deeds:
Referendum - Germantown School District
Question #1:
Shall the following Initial Resolution be approved?
INITIAL RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $22,500,000
BE IT RESOLVED by the School Board of the Germantown School District, Washington County, Wisconsin that there shall be issued pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $22,500,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of constructing a new elementary school on school district property next to Kinderberg Park; technology, safety and security initiatives District wide; and acquiring furnishings, fixtures and equipment.
Yes ____
No ____
Question #2
Shall the following Resolution be approved?
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET TO EXCEED REVENUE LIMIT BY $500,000
FOR RECURRING PURPOSES
BE IT RESOLVED by the School Board of the Germantown School District, Washington County, Wisconsin that the revenues included in the School District budget for the 2010-2011 school year and thereafter be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $500,000 a year, for recurring purposes consisting of costs associated with the new elementary school.
Yes ____
No ____
~~~~~~~~~~
The ballot is two-sided as you would expect from the many questions.
|
By Al Campbell
Monday, Sep 15 2008, 09:02 AM
Special School Board Meeting...
Tom Kertscher's article in the Journal Sentinel indicates that the school board will convene at 5:30PM today to consider referendum questions.
He reports that the school board has voted to end the full day kindergarten effort for the 2009-2010 school year because of the space limitations that necessitated a lottery approach. Michael Schultz, Vice President of the board was quoted as saying that he didn't make this proposal to persuade voters to approve a building referendum but saw that a connection might be made by voters. His attributed quote in this article was, "They are not unrelated".
I am not aware of who voted in favor or if there were votes in opposition but I hope commenters may flesh that out for us.
Without taking a position on the matters that we may be voting for or against (since I don't yet know my position having not seen the actual items) there is, I think, a very real potential for a public relations backlash coming as the result of the recent vote against. This approach, as described by Kertscher, is a typical reaction as we've seen over and over again when a school board loses a referendum request. I have said before that I think a follow-up question without any changes made will be met with voter angst without regard to the needs.
It appears that there may, in fact, be some changes to the question or questions. First, apparently the $16.5MM request will be bumped to $22.5MM so that cost increases in the original plan and safety and technology upgrades to other buildings can be accommodated.
A second question is apparently going to be part of the debate at today's meeting (which I'll not be able to attend). The school district apparently will seek approval of the second question that would permit the district to exceed mandated revenue limits by some $750,000 annually. Whether or not there is a limit to the number of years or if this is intended to be open-ended is not clear. If open-ended, I suspect the voters will nix this request.
Does this $750,000 represent the battle between district administration and the school board? There has been quite a bit of 'back and forth' on a somewhat similar amount that seems to be a constant in spite of board direction.
Mid-Moraine Municipal Court...
Judge John Grundahl appears to once again find himself embroiled in some controversy. If you recall, he was involved in an issue brought to the fore by various police chiefs in his jurisdiction over the length of time he required to process warrants with some of those having taken three to four months. There was also a question about his holding juvenile convictions open for months.
In spite of that adverse publicity, Judge Grundahl was re-elected in the following election defeating Janet Heins.
The latest issue involves municipalities having approved a $50 fee for each time a warrant is issued with $25 going to the court (as is now the case) and the additional $25 going to the issuing municipality. The person named in the warrant would be obligated to pay this fee. Germantown is among the 14 municipalities that are perturbed by his refusal to collect the additional $25 fee. Judge Grundahl has been quoted as saying, "My concern was and is that this is an attempt to expand the authority of the Municipal Court without statutory support."
Is this simply a continuation of the most recent brouhaha? Is the judge simply being obstinate to demonstrate that he is the judge? Attorneys for the communities involved indicate that this practice is in place in other areas of Wisconsin.
This will probably end up being taken to the Circuit Court for a ruling. That seems a real waste of time for a court system that has not a lot of extra time available. Maybe the Attorney General can clear this matter up quickly.
Is it simply happenstance that we find Judge Grundahl involved in yet another dispute with the communities that comprise this court's jurisdictional district or does he lay in wait for such an issue to surface so that he can be disruptive?
|
By Al Campbell
Tuesday, Sep 9 2008, 02:47 PM
Vote Today...
There is still time to vote. Polls are open until 8:00PM. I voted at about 10:30AM and was number 112 in my district. Two contested races will be decided by today's vote.
Sendik's Again...
I was VERY pleased to learn yesterday that, at my age with sparse grey hair (stubble actually), I can actually purchase beer, wine or liquor in the Sendik's liquor store WITHOUT the need to show someone that I'm at least 21 years old.
And, I can report that items I purchase regularly appear to be priced at or below the prices in the neighboring establishment...at least during the initial stages of their operation. Maybe that will change, but I hope not.
School Referendum...
Ty Finke reports in an adjacent article that the school board has approved the administration preparing a new referendum question for the November election concerning a new elementary building, and additional funds for two other needs identified.
I really think this is going to antagonize the electorate, but I have been wrong before. The probable thinking is that with the normally heavy turn-out during a Presidential election, the issue will be carried substantially. I have no way of knowing, but I fear this will pollute the stream no matter the side one finds himself or herself supporting.
Apparently a special meeting will be called to review the question before a final commitment is made. Citizens need to make their positions known before and during that meeting.
An angry electorate will do no one any good, and could backfire to the eventual detriment of the community. Emotion is a tough taskmaster and yields strange decisions on occasion.
|
By Al Campbell
Wednesday, Sep 3 2008, 09:22 AM
Special Board Meeting Follow-Up...
The special meeting of the village board was convened at 5:35PM with Trustee Zabel absent but expected soon thereafter.
In the audience were news reporters, two members of the MATC staff and two school board members. It appeared that there were also individuals from both Waste Management and, possibly, from Veolia.
The discussion on MATC secession centered on the desire by some that a 'co-signature' be provided for the village board to assert its approval of the filing. There was discussion that since the village is one of several taxing entities, if the village were included, the others would need to be, too. This was settled when Trustee Langer offered a motion to have a supporting letter attached to the filing by the school district. After the second, that motion passed unanimously (with Zabel absent).
The discussion on the possibility of a referendum regarding road repairs dealt with debt levies, budget trade-offs, and state gas tax proceeds. It became apparent that there was no support for a referendum and that trustees felt it was their responsibility to determine how best to handle the issue without incurring more debt. Trustee Vanderheiden offered a motion that was seconded by Trustee Langer to that effect. That motion passed nearly unanimously with Trustee Zabel abstaining since he had arrived midway through this discussion.
The discussion concerning Waste Management and the current labor issues as those were impacting the village followed. While President Kempinski and Administrator Schornack indicated that each had received calls about delayed pick-ups, the other members of the board were either moot or expressed that they had received no calls. Discussion as to what would constitute sufficient grounds for action against Waste Management went back and forth. It seemed to be agreed that there was not sufficient cause to proceed at this point. Trustee Werderman offered a motion, seconded by Trustee Langer, that this topic of discussion be added to the agenda for the regularly scheduled Board meeting to be held on September 15th. That motion passed unanimously.
President Kempinski gaveled the meeting to adjournment.
Harley 105th Anniversary Impact From The Police' Perspective...
I was curious as to how the police department viewed the 105th anniversary given the thousands of bikes in our area nearly all hours of the day and night. Chief Pete Hoell indicated that there was one minor injury accident involving a motorcycle. He mentioned that he had now experienced the 95th, 100th and 105th reunion celebrations and said, "Overall, as far as I'm concerned, this was a great event and we'll be looking forward to the 110th."
He also provided an anecdote that I think provides a great overview of the typical attendees:
"I was off duty with my kids driving east on Holy Hill Rd. in Richfield on Friday. I was following a couple of Harley bikes eastbound when a high performance bike (crotch rocket) came from the other direction (westbound) and did a short wheelie from the stop sign. The biker in front of me was wearing colors, long grey curly hair; typical stereotype of a biker one may think of from earlier years. When he saw the wheelie and as the high performance bike drove by, the Harley biker made his displeasure of this act very clear and scolded him by shaking his arm and pointer finger at him. It was a really good example how ethical most Harley bikers are, how willing they are to step up regarding the issue of safety and good behavior."
Nuff said!
|
By Al Campbell
Tuesday, Sep 2 2008, 09:06 AM
Special Board Meeting Follow-Up...
The special board meeting to be convened at 5:30PM tonight deals, in part, with the Waste Management strike and garbage pick-up delays. I received an email from President Kempinski over the week-end discussing my Village Buzz piece of late last week.
He indicated that the Waste Management topic had been added to the special meeting agenda to "keep the Board apprised as to the status of collection, and determine if the Board wishes to change companies should the company fall even further behind". He went on to state that he didn't want to change companies but that he felt compelled to explore alternatives in case service should drop to even lower levels.
I had indicated that our personal experience was that Friday's pick-up was made on Friday. He mentioned that the village had received calls indicating that pick-ups had been delayed two days in some instances.
President Kempinski also discussed the eventuality of switching to Veolia if Waste Management's service degraded to the point where that would be necessary. His reasoning seemed to be that, if this went on for some time, and if many communities had similar experiences, there could be a wholesale departure from Waste Management that would overwhelm Veolia's capabilities.
He believes that, if Veolia comes back to the village indicating that it would be willing to accept the terms of the Waste Management agreement, the Board would be willing to switch.
A couple of thoughts come to mind:
If the current agreement has a five-day clause and if Waste Management continues to pick up garbage within that time span, does the village have any real recourse?
Even if there is a wholesale move away from Waste Management, maybe Germantown would, by staying with Waste Management after some agreement renegotiation actually see improved service since Waste Management would have less business and would likely be trying very diligently to repair the image damage it would've suffered.
I'll report on the discussion from today's special meeting in a 'Village Buzz' item tomorrow, if not before.
~~~~~~~~~~
School District Budget Deliberations...
An earlier segment on the current budget debate within the Germantown School District referred to some debate as to the size and configuration of the budget for the coming year.
It appears that this debate continues and centers on the draft prepared by the Administration which does not yet meet the constraints that at least some Board members feel necessary. A target amount of $39,495,814 had been established last spring. The administration has continued to stand behind a proposed budget that is some $650,000 higher.
Obviously, the school district has a relatively new business manager although he did have experience gained as a member of the school board when assuming that position. There was over-spending in several accounts that were discretionary in nature as opposed to accounts that are relatively 'locked in'. This apparently has caused some concern as to fiscal constraint.
We also have a new superintendent who certainly has been working hard to learn his new district's idiosyncrasies and needs while also working to build his board and staff relationships. That may be at work to some degree but it seems that staff would be anxious to follow its new leader rather than 'stand in the doorway'.
I suppose that staff might be expected to seek more money than the board is willing to provide, but, at some point, posturing has to give ground to reality.
|
By Al Campbell
Wednesday, Aug 27 2008, 08:31 AM
MATC Secession...
It appears that we're finally moving ahead in the effort to have ourselves removed from the MATC district and moved into the Moraine Park Technical College (MPTC) district. In spite of some village officials' assertions, the timing of this filing and its date of effect wouldn't have changed by filing three months earlier. That complaint is a 'straw man' from my perspective.
I would suspect that a filing made on behalf of a school district would receive more consideration than had the village filed its own petition. The school district speaks on behalf of the area while the village would speak on behalf of only the Village of Germantown. While we're a significant part of the school district, we're not all of it by any means.
Can we make history and become only the second such petition to be successfully brought? Wouldn't it be interesting since the first and only successful petition was that filed by our area to be removed from the MPTC area and realigned with the MATC area in 1971, if memory serves?
What goes around, comes around...maybe!
~~~~~~~~~~
Waste Management Strike...
The village is, of course, served by Waste Management. The Local 200 teamster members who are employees of Waste Management went out on strike, as you've probably heard, after some four months of trying to resolve issues on behalf of those members.
Village President Tom Kempinski has reportedly threatened to terminate the village's contract with Waste Management apparently to protest the company's inaction, and has supposedly sought an opinion from the village attorney as to whether or not this is possible. Kempinski is affiliated with Local 200 although he denies that has any direct involvement in this action.
Two things:
Our service with Waste Management is much improved over that we received from the former servicing company. I presume that many of those current teamster members were probably also former employees of the last firm that had the Germantown contract.
This seems a very convenient time for Kempinski to be pushing a termination; he appears to be using the village's business to bring even more heat on the Waste Management negotiating team in favor of his fellow teamsters. That is inappropriate if true, and an unfortunate confluence of events if simply coincidence.
His two lives must be kept separate and distinct.
~~~~~~~~~~
The Harley Rumble...
The "Harley Rumble", as I'll call it, has returned to our area. As I lay my head on the pillow last night, I could hear the sounds that are only made by Harleys waft through the open window. We're a couple of miles away from Hwy 41/45 so my joy may well have been another's dismay, but it is a great sound that we last heard some five years ago.
Quite a tribute to the small motorized bicycle shop that started in a shed.
And, quite a bump for the local economy. I had begun to see out-of-towners in Harley garb already patronizing local stores and hotels and watering holes yesterday.
|
By Al Campbell
Wednesday, Jul 16 2008, 08:48 AM
News reports indicate that Village President Tom Kempinski is considering asking the Board to approve a referendum that would appear on either the September ballot or the November ballot. This referendum would deal with just how Germantown voters desire to fund some $2,000,000 per year in road repairs, if they desire to do so. The choices apparently would be borrowing, increasing property taxes or a combination of both or none.
The referendum could be advisory or binding in nature. Obviously, if advisory, the Board would then decide what, if any action it would take, but it would do so with some idea of the public's mood. If binding, the results would stand as the electorate decided at least until the Board was reconstituted or until the Board found some other approach to achieve the end if that were possible.
If property taxes were increased by $2,000,000 annually, the increase in village taxes over 2008 would be some 20.5% without consideration for any other line item increases in the village budget. It is unrealistic to assume that all other expenses will remain constant. If the amount were to be borrowed, the debt service would be part of the tax increase each year so that both the amount spent each year plus interest would be added to the tax bills over a number of years.
The village's portion of our total tax bill in 2008 was 24.52%; that share would climb to 30.67% if all other taxing units remained at 2008 levels which, unfortunately, is very unlikely. The actual increase in total property taxes due to the village's portion of the total could be something in the range of 1% to 2% I would suspect.
Use of a referendum will please some people and anger others. Some will say that this gives the voter the direct voice on specific items that they otherwise lack in representative government. Others will say the referendum gives the Board a place to hide; still others will say that there should be no referendum.
There are several questions that come to mind about which you may wish to make your views known:
1. Do we need $2 million worth of road repair every year? For how many years?
2. What portion of the village's road surfaces need to be repaired today?
3. Have past Boards avoided their responsibilities and not funded road repairs properly?
4. Is a referendum a good idea or is it a convenient tool for a Board that doesn't wish to stake out a position that may be very unpopular?
5. If this referendum appears on the ballot, what impact will that have on any issue the School Board may advance at the same time?
6. If we are to see a referendum, should it be simply an advisory referendum or should it bind the Board to a specific direction?
What think you G'town?
|
More Posts
|
|