I was listening to Jay Weber on WISN 1130 this morning and he had a proposition to resolve the smoking ban issue that had been mentioned to him by Jerry Bott at the same station.
Why not give every restaurant and tavern owner sixty days during which time they would need to decide if they were going to welcome smokers or go non-smoking entirely? Each would then be able to cater to those whom they would naturally attract. The doors would carry a big sign telling people which way this establishment had gone.
The discussion ended with the statement that this would never be tolerated by Governor Doyle and the Democrats since this debate has to be 'all or nothing' from their points of view. Giving us citizens the ability to make our own decisions is not part of the more liberal world. Of course, the 'reason' would be stated along the lines of having to protect the workers who had no choice as to where they worked.
It is as if they just know that we're too 'something' to be permitted to exercise free will since we tend to make the wrong decisions from their perspective.
As I thought about that conclusion, it seemed that there was quite a degree of truth in it. Our governing bodies do seem to feel that they have been ordained by our vote to make all life's decisions for us poor 'know-nothings'. Could it be that they draw this conclusion from the fact that each of them were elected by us in the first place? Is that how they know that we're incapable of making good decisions?
