|
By Al Campbell
Wednesday, Oct 15 2008, 02:38 PM
I had intended to scan a copy of the sample ballot for Germantown however that wasn't sufficiently legible. So, we'll list the offices for which there are candidate selections to be made by all of us who are registered to vote in the village.
You may elect to vote a straight ticket including, in the order found on the ballot:
-
Democratic
-
Republican
-
Wisconsin Green
-
Libertarian
The race for President and Vice President, in the order found on the ballot:
-
Barack Obama/Joe Biden (Democratic)
-
John McCain/Sarah Palin (Republican)
-
Cynthia McKinney/Rosa Clemente (Wisconsin Green)
-
Bob Barr/Wayne A. Root (Libertarian)
-
Brian Moore/Stewart A. Alexander (Socialist Party USA)
-
Gloria LaRiva/Robert Moses (Party for Socialism, & Liberation)
-
Ralph Nader/Matt Gonzalez (Independent)
-
Chuck Baldwin/Darrell L. Castle (Constitution Party)
-
Jeffrey J. Wamboldt/David J. Klimisch (We, the People)
-
Write-in________________
Representative in Congress District 5, in the order found on the ballot:
State Senator District 8, in the order found on the ballot:
Representative to the Assembly District 24, in the order found on the ballot:
District Attorney:
County Clerk:
Treasurer:
Register of Deeds:
Referendum - Germantown School District
Question #1:
Shall the following Initial Resolution be approved?
INITIAL RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $22,500,000
BE IT RESOLVED by the School Board of the Germantown School District, Washington County, Wisconsin that there shall be issued pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $22,500,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of constructing a new elementary school on school district property next to Kinderberg Park; technology, safety and security initiatives District wide; and acquiring furnishings, fixtures and equipment.
Yes ____
No ____
Question #2
Shall the following Resolution be approved?
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET TO EXCEED REVENUE LIMIT BY $500,000
FOR RECURRING PURPOSES
BE IT RESOLVED by the School Board of the Germantown School District, Washington County, Wisconsin that the revenues included in the School District budget for the 2010-2011 school year and thereafter be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $500,000 a year, for recurring purposes consisting of costs associated with the new elementary school.
Yes ____
No ____
~~~~~~~~~~
The ballot is two-sided as you would expect from the many questions.
|
By Al Campbell
Monday, Aug 25 2008, 09:06 AM
You and me are really great people. Why is that? Well, we seem to help bail out just about everything that bangs on Washington's door.
A short time ago, the sub-prime mortgage companies received their bail out; likely the first of their bail outs since Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are still in the throes of that mess.
Now the automobile industry is in the queue for what yesterday was about $25 billion and today has already climbed to $40 billion according to the press.
Is this a proper use for the tax dollars that are extracted from each of us? Should we be funding these bail outs for industries that essentially have gone bad because of their own doing? If you or me were responsible for these 'disasters', we'd probably step up to the plate and take what was coming to us. But we didn't force people to be too gullible and let people sell them homes they couldn't afford. We didn't cause the oil price jump because we didn't approve new refineries for thirty years or drill for new fields of oil?
If any of us should be paying 'the price', it seems that the finger of blame needs to be pointed at Washington and the people we send there to represent us. That group has caused these issues to surface through favors to those putting money into their campaign accounts. That group has caved in to the environmental groups that are fanatical to the extreme in their pursuit of the ultimate goal they espouse.
Oh, that's right. We are to blame because we continue to return the same people to Washington in spite of what they do and don't do. We don't require any 'reparations' for their actions.
Maybe we all need to get a little more involved and a little more vocal starting with our upcoming local elections. Too may of us simply shake our heads and fume; we really need to be more active in our precincts and districts and villages or cities, and in our counties and states.
I saw a quote in the past few days that went along these lines: "Too many people have died for our freedoms for us to not vote."
|
By Al Campbell
Sunday, Aug 24 2008, 08:00 AM
Why is it that at the bottom of too many discussions about rate increases or tax increases we find a series of initials? It apparently isn't enough that we are forced to deal with the MATC. We also are saddled with the MMSD.
The Metropolitan Milwaukee Sewerage District (MMSD) hit our village and other taxing entities with a significant increase in capital expense contributions that it requires from its 'customers'. Its 'customers', of course have no other options. So like other communities, Germantown has had to 'pony up'. We've been depleting the sewer fund reserves to the tune of nearly $1 million each year over the past three years, and our reserves are going down as the result. The idea of a reserve is that there will be adequate funds available in reserve if needed due to some unforeseen situation.
The long and short is that we'll likely face an increase in sewer charges due to these charges laid on us by MMSD.
MMSD, like MATC, is governed by an appointed board. These eleven people include village/city officials, elected representatives, and others whose names seem to always be involved in such appointed positions. You and I do not have any representation on the MMSD board over which we exercise even indirect control. The citizens of Germantown should, by now, be resigned to our fate...except there has to be a better way.
I challenge one or more of the current crop of candidates for state positions to pledge their best efforts to change this system. Every appointed board in the state should be subjected to thorough review to determine if direct elections are a more appropriate way to determine those who'll be seated. We have heard that some are willing to look at the mechanism for governance of the State Technical College System.
There really must be a top down review of every similar entity in Wisconsin, and it ought to be very rigorous...not simply a 'lip service' group convened with foregone conclusions from day one!
|
By Al Campbell
Thursday, Jun 26 2008, 09:11 AM
MATC has now ended the suspense. Whew! It has officially increased its tax take by the 4.9% that it miraculously managed to get down to from the original 'straw man' of 6.4%. This codifies the fact that MATC's appetite for tax dollars has risen by some 30% over the past five years. MATC's leadership, if it can be called that without demeaning the word, just can't seem to understand that, while it is impervious to the wants and needs of the citizenry it serves, it really has permitted its reach to exceed our grasp.
MATC strikes me as an iceberg looking for a ship to sink. It is floating along with the tip showing while the bulk of the 'bloat' lies just under the waterline, out of sight and, too often, out of mind. Until it hits the ship of taxpayers yet again. The taxpayers on this 'ship of fools' have finally come to understand, at least in Germantown, that they would be better-served if they were permitted to disembark from the current ship that continues to be victimized by the MATC iceberg...year after year after year after year!
That disembarkation is, however, contingent on so many disparate factors as to seem nearly unachievable. First and foremost is that failure to make the petition to the state technical college board seeking a move from MATC to another contiguous tech college district renders all the other points moot. If that is filed, then we wait and see what the august state tech college board members decide is to be our fate. The last such application was made in 2004 and was denied. That doesn't necessarily mean that this petition would suffer the same fate...but it is probably a decent precursor. The only other successful action of this nature involved Germantown's petition to be moved into the MATC district back in the early 1970s. (Ironic, isn't it?)
Back to the basics, however. This rate of increase could've been far better controlled if the governing board for MATC were subject to re-election. It isn't. It is subject only to the parochial appointment desires of MATC. Talk about a great deal, huh? If I'm going to be governed by someone, I'd love the opportunity to pick the person without any outside interference over things such as how effective they'd be in administering their responsibilities. If I 'accidentally' picked someone that was in lock-step with my positions and goals, could I possibly be faulted? Sure, but it would be meaningless because no one could do anything about it except maybe move away to escape.
Maybe more to the point, I could've used the euphemism of a polar ice mass, a glacier, grinding everything in its path into submission. Pretty soon there'll be nothing left here to tax. It'll have been destroyed by the taxes rendered.
I guess the good news is that you can't tax the same dollar for more than 100 cents, so there is some ultimate end point. Yet, there are so many taxes being levied against each of our dollars that we get less and less while everything costs us more and more.
Maybe, IF we pursue the change in tech college districts, and IF the state tech college board approves, we can rid ourselves of MATC President Cole, his board and his kingdom of fire-breathing dragons that burn everything of value they can identify in their domain.
I believe a full scale audit of that institution is called for and I believe one or more of our elected officials at the state level needs to pick up that banner and carry it high for all to see. This is way past the point of being mere Blog fodder, although it sure has been good for that!
|
By Al Campbell
Monday, Jun 23 2008, 09:01 AM
The morning Journal Sentinel talks about a petition being presented to the Milwaukee Common Council today that would require all Milwaukee private employers to provide paid sick days. Employers with ten or fewer employees would be required to provide 1 hour for every 30 hours worked to a maximum of 40 hours of paid sick time per year. Employers with more than ten employees would be required to provide 1 hour for every 30 hours worked up to a maximum of 72 hours per year. Unused sick days would roll over from year to year.
This petition has been pushed by "labor, educational and community organizations" according to the article with the lead organization being 9 to 5, the National Association of Working Women. It uses a state statute that provides for what is known as 'direct legislation', and requires the petitioner to present petitions signed by 15% of the total residents of the city or village involved that voted for governor in the most recent election.
Presuming all is in order with the petitions and signatures, the city council or village board would then be required to pass it or to put it on the ballot in the next election for a binding decision by the electorate.
I do not believe that a mandated employer sick pay law is appropriate anywhere, and am not suggesting that it ought be tried in Germantown. The article cites the food service industry, for example; can you imagine how that would affect that industry? Can you imagine how the costs would escalate if this were to occur? Can you think of a more 'anti-business' proposition?
* * * * * * * * * *
It is interesting, however, that such direct action is available to citizens in cities and villages in Wisconsin. Someone at sometime thought this was a good approach, and it found its way into law. It obviously has a double edge to it. It could be employed for good things or not so good things. What it does do, however, is place the ultimate decision in the hands of the electorate if the city or village officials chose to ignore the petitioners' demands.
Is this a necessary 'check and balance' functionality or is it simply a tool that can be misused by the few taking advantage of emotional responses from the many? Do we destroy the concept of representative government? Do we permit populism to run rampant?
|
By Al Campbell
Monday, Jun 9 2008, 09:28 AM
The move toward filing the documents necessary to seek secession from the Milwaukee Area Technical College tax district has begun to draw some debate amongst the politicos in Germantown.
Village President Kempinski has been quoted as being concerned with the seemingly slow movement in this process, and School Board President Erdmann says that we shouldn't worry because it is being taken up in July for ultimate filing in August.
Some have pointed to the earlier appointment of Superintendent Victor Rossetti as the death blow to any secession movement since Germantown is now directly represented on the MATC Board.
Mr. Rossetti will serve his last day as superintendent on June 30th. What happens then? Does he have to step down or is he permitted to serve out his term since he is then a 'former' superintendent. What happens if he moves from the MATC district? Is he immediately susceptible to removal if he doesn't resign?
Interesting questions all. I have written earlier of some concern since the MATC discussion had been quiet for a seemingly long period of time. Then we were advised that we shouldn't worry since the school board would resume its discussion in July.
We are still a long way from the actual filing of documents and then we must await the decision of the state technical college board that is due within ninety days of the filing. Then, even if we were to be successful...and that is far from a certainty...the actual secession wouldn't occur until the start of a new fiscal period for technical colleges.
And, of course, while this all plays out, we are being over-taxed and under-served by the money-eating monster that we know as MATC.
What we don't need are any artificial obstacles cropping up along the pathway to change.
|
By Al Campbell
Friday, May 23 2008, 09:02 AM
We are, by all signs, involved in an oil cost run-up driven by demand being greater than supply. It is exacerbated for us Americans because our monetary policy has seen an intentional softening of the dollar (our money is worth less than other peoples' money, so it takes more of it to buy a barrel of crude oil). I paid $4.20 per gallon yesterday with the price of crude oil standing at about $130 +/- per barrel. Predictions of crude oil prices of $150 per barrel or more are seen or heard regularly now. And, the cost of oil could well be higher than that by year-end.
How did we get to this point? We got there by congressional law making, by presidents rolling over and signing those bills, and by our country's increasing needs/demand for gasoline and diesel fuel. Why would we permit ourselves to become part of such a quagmire?
Politics! Politics played by those on both sides of the aisle. Conservatives seem to have lost their voices. Liberals never seem to lose their voices.
Laws were re-written more than thirty years ago to make it nearly impossible for a new refinery to be built. Those were the result of congress being rolled by the environmentalists and presidents either believing the rhetoric of the day or fearing the backlash should they stand up to the rhetoric. This has continued to this very day. We are forbidden from drilling within 200 miles of the California and Florida coastlines but the Chinese are already doing so as we sit on our thumbs. We are unable to pursue the shale oil deposits that span our northern plains and southwestern states. We have ample untapped resources that are readily available but our laws don't permit us to make use of those resources.
We see the 'global warming' group and the 'environmentalist group' driving our economy into the ground...and we have not found the moral outrage/courage to stand up to them and say "no more"! We could easily build new refineries in any number of locations around our country but we're not permitted to do so. We know how to drill and refine today without ruining our world. It takes from 6 to 10 years to bring a new refinery on-line so the time to have declared a moratorium on the rules that made it impossible to build new refining capacity has come and gone. But, the typical congressional response of "that will take ten years" should remind us that if we don't roll back those silly laws today, it'll take ten years from whenever we do roll back those silly laws. The time to begin is now, not next week or next month.
We witnessed the ridiculous 'hearings' held by congress in the past few weeks. We watched as Sen. Herb Kohl embarrassed himself by chiding the 'big bad oil companies' for making a profit. He is a former businessman who certainly understands that profit must be derived in order for businesses to exist and grow. He knew how that worked when he ran Kohl's Food Stores. He certainly must have some comprehension as the owner of the Milwaukee Bucks. His statement to the oil company executives that their profits didn't seem fair gives one a lot of insight. He knows better but he will play/pander to the crowd he favors. He 'feels' as do most liberals. He doesn't necessarily reason. He has his millions, so he can set out to control everyone else who aspires to similar success.
Sen. Kohl is but one of the 535 members of congress. Too many of those men and women are too intent on keeping their offices to actually vote the way they probably know they should. You have probably heard the old phrase that states you must "go along to get along". That should be inscribed over the doorways leading to the House and the Senate chambers since it is the rule that is followed by the vast majority of people who walk through those portals. That is true on the national stage, the state stage and the local stage.
The people who go to Washington and who do not give in and play by the Washingtonian rules are few and very far between.
Whose fault is this dilemma in the final analysis? Yours and mine.
We're the men and women who have permitted this to happen. We don't vote in the House or the Senate, but we do elect those who do...and we do not seem to unelect people very often once they've gotten into office. Rep. Steve Kagen (D) from the Appleton area stands for re-election this November. He is at his most defeatable point historically. If he survives the first re-election campaign and keeps his seat, he is likely to be in that seat for so long as he desires without regard to how he votes or doesn't vote.
We're so unconcerned about our vote, it seems, that we don't even think voting is sacrosanct enough to require valid photo identification before we're permitted to cast a ballot.
So, all this angst has been brought to us by us. Remember that the next time you buy gasoline or diesel fuel. Remember that the next time you go to the grocery store and try to make your food budget stretch. Remember that when you ponder whether or not you'll be able to take a vacation this year, or buy new school clothing for your children, or go out for a fish fry. Remember that when you try to stretch your retirement income to cover your basic needs.
And, when you've gotten yourself all 'cranked up', if that happens, make a resolution to get involved and stay involved and to talk with your elected representatives at every level of government and let them know what you think and what you want them to do on your behalf. And, if they fail you, fire them with your vote at the polling place.
Had you and I done that two decades ago instead of simply going with the flow, maybe we'd not be in the situation we find ourselves in today.
Filed under: County Board, Economy, Healthcare, MATC, Political, Quality of Life, School Board, Taxes, U.S., Village Board, Wisconsin
Permalink |
Mail to a friend
|
By Al Campbell
Wednesday, May 21 2008, 09:24 AM
The MATC has developed yet another draft budget after the first such exercise produced the need for a 6.4% property tax increase (see Blog of April 23rd). At the time of that budget draft, the governor apparently said he would not countenance such an increase. MATC announced then that it would go back to the old drawing board and see what could be done to get down into the range of 'as little' as a 5.0% to 5.5% property tax increase.
Guess what? They can now apparently declare victory in this onerous task since the finance committee is only proposing a revised draft budget that would consume another 4.9% increase in property taxes. The proposed draft will come to a vote by the full board on May 27th.
MATC has developed budgets since 2004 that will have caused property tax increases of more than 30% if this draft is ultimately approved.
Has your personal income increased by 30% in the past four years? Has your savings account grown by 30% in the past four years? Has yours become a single income family instead of a dual income family in the past four years? I doubt it. But, if so, congratulations! Even with such an increase, if that has happened for you, I'll wager that you have better places to put your hard-earned money.
The MATC finance committee says it has cut all it could cut from the budget. Jeannette Bell, committee member and former West Allis mayor, was in favor of not only this 4.9% property tax increase, but also favors reducing the reserve account held by MATC which has been done as part of this draft.
People costs are budgeted to increase significantly. Wages and salaries will go up about $1.5 million. Health care costs will rise by some $2 million. Other 'fringe' benefits will add another $4.5 million, including $2 million required to bring the recognition of accrued benefits onto the MATC books like any other 'business' must do today. That is $2 million of 'funny money'; where else would we find accounting tricks employed if we were to subject this institution to the standards maintained by businesses?
I cannot accept the statement that MATC has cut 'everything possible' and still needs this kind of increase budget over budget. The paragraph above suggests to me that people costs are way too high, and a very quick way to achieve reductions there is to have fewer people. Maybe MATC should think about outsourcing certain functions. Maybe they should think about 'tough love' negotiations with union representatives. There are or ought to be limits even for tax-funded entities.
Maybe MATC needs to review its class demand and determine the bottom third by attendance and end those classes. If there is insufficient demand, there is apparently not an identifiable 'significant' need. MATC cannot be providing services to a market that doesn't exist in sufficient numbers to show demand. That would free up space for other uses, and it would, or should, enable staff cuts that will reduce costs.
It is impossible to forget, in this debate over MATC, that there is a very real problem with the Milwaukee schools system and we must recognize that some of MATC's costs should rightfully be paid for by the Milwaukee school system since MATC is mopping up after that dismal performance. Adult high school education classes and GED classes are an example of how the public education structure in Milwaukee fails its students and the residents of the community. Interestingly enough, this may well be an intended consequence rather than an unintended consequence. It gets non-Milwaukee taxpayers to pay more of the Milwaukee education costs than is already done through state tax distribution formula.
Finally, I suggest once again that MATC needs to clean up its many acts. It needs to get out of the failed business incubator function. It needs to quit building physical monuments to itself and its leaders. It needs to look at sale and lease-back arrangements. It needs to reduce staff.
Frankly, it is becoming more and more apparent that significant leadership changes may be required, as well. MATC leadership seems to be ignorant of the public's needs. This is an institution answerable to no one other than the governor through his ability to appoint members to the state technical college board. The state legislature and the governor must act to bring this renegade system under absolute control. There must be a change in the manner in which the state board and the district boards are created; voters need to determine who sits on those boards. The current incestuous approach simply doesn't work...for anyone other than the leaders and those who sit on the rubber stamp boards.
All this brings me to the next obvious question: Where do we stand in the quest for permission to move to another technical college district? There seems to have been a long delay in the process; maybe it is justified. I hope it doesn't mean that the movement has been quietly put to sleep.
|
By Al Campbell
Monday, Apr 28 2008, 08:27 AM
I received several emails that provided some additional information and thoughts on the subject of the intersection at Mequon and Wausaukee Roads at the very east edge of the village.
Trustee Wolter was kind enough to send an email covering a meeting held at the Germantown Library on Thursday afternoon, April 24th. The City of Mequon and Village of Germantown were represented, Senator Darling and Representatives Ott and Jeskewitz attended and several Department of Transportation representatives were present.
The topic was the intersection in question and DOT was seeking a 'compromise' for the signalization of the intersection. The plan that was in process of implementation at that time was for two straight through lanes, dedicated left turn lanes with islands, and dedicated right turn lanes on Mequon with a single straight through lane traveling north and south on Wausaukee Road.
City of Mequon officials thought this was 'overkill' since they consider the area to be rural, and their planning supports that it will remain rural in their eyes. They preferred the roundabout solution and were pushing for that as the outcome of this meeting. Germantown officials wanted the intersection to stay as the DOT had designed and based this on the increased traffic due to Waste Management trucks and the increase in auto traffic east and west during weekday commute periods. They also foresaw an increase in traffic as building in TIF 4 increased. The DOT was looking out 20 years so far as design and capacity.
The 'compromise' that came from this meeting was this: a single straight through lane east and west on Mequon along with dedicated left hand and right hand turn lanes while Wausaukee stayed as designed with a single lane in both directions. The provision was that something might need to be rebuilt if traffic projections were to be reached in the next ten years.
Conversations I have had indicate that some are concerned about the village being required to pick up the future cost while the DOT is now paying 100% of the costs for the construction. Others have voiced the opinion that a roundabout was their preference, as well, and cited the thought that we may have been able to forego all construction if enforcement were to be stepped up in that area. Still others questioned the need for any change suggesting that there were single digit accidents per year from their observations.
So, there is apparently a compromise in place. Maybe this will stay in place since all the 'official' parties were at this table. As is customary, some of the 'unofficial' parties will continue to disagree. That is among the reasons we hold elections every few years.
|
By Al Campbell
Friday, Apr 25 2008, 11:57 AM
The intersection of Wausaukee and Mequon Roads has been accident prone for some time with the increased traffic loads that have developed. The state Department of Transportation had originally indicated that it intended to place a 'round-about' at this intersection to slow traffic and control the flow through the intersection. Seemingly the fact that this involved a state highway with relatively high speeds hadn't crossed the state's institutional mind. Long story short, a couple of Germantown people who are no longer in office worked diligently to get this intended action changed and succeeded.
The state recently announced that a traffic light intersection would be created at that location and that the state would fully fund the work with the proviso that Germantown maintain the intersection. Part of this intersection is in Ozaukee County and Mequon.
It seems that Mequon has made a 'stink' with very little in the way of rational reason, and this has apparently caused the state to threaten to renege on its written intention earlier provided to Germantown. This situation has degenerated to the point where the 'round-about' solution was back on the table, and the ultimate outcome is very much in doubt. In the meantime, accidents continue to occur and will continue to occur until something is done to eliminate the danger.
If you have strong feelings about this, it is the time to voice those to your elected representatives who serve in Madison. When the state makes a decision and then rescinds that decision, someone somewhere must've done some tail-twisting. You might also want to let your Trustees and Village President know just how strongly you feel about this so they can add the weight of your comments to their own. The appropriate addresses are to found on the Village website link that is located at the very bottom of the GermantownNOW site you're on now.
|
By Al Campbell
Wednesday, Apr 23 2008, 08:58 AM
We've gone a long time between Blogs centering on MATC, but it is again time to take a critical look. A 'headline' from some time ago suggested that MATC just can't help itself. That seems to be the case. They certainly don't seek out the kind of news coverage they tend to generate. No organization would want to be in this type of 'limelight' and yet they do it to themselves over and over and over again.
Yesterday we learned that poor old MATC was being chastised by the 'state' for having proposed a budget that would require a property tax increase of some 6.4%. It seems that even Governor Doyle thought that was too high, and that is going some when you think about all the tax increases and fee increases he has dumped in our laps.
So, having had their knuckles rapped with a ruler, they are being forced to the unthinkable...they may have to make some cuts in their expenses!!
They are now talking about cuts that will get the property tax increase down to as little as 5% to 5.5%. These people do not live in the world that you and I populate. They must breath some other life giving gas other than oxygen. Maybe they're actually in a different orbit. It seems obvious that they are not bound by the same life rules that we, the taxpayers, are bound to follow.
Hammering at an old theme again, if you and I have too little income for our expense load, we usually will look at our expense first and make the necessary adjustments. In the world occupied by MATC, it seems that you first look at raising your revenue before you even give any thought to reductions in budget.
An article today centers upon the 'incubator boondoggle' that MATC created for itself many years ago. We've Blogged about that before, as well. Some of the businesses aren't real businesses with any hope of survival in the real world. Many are considerably behind in their rent payments. Now MATC is looking at actually closing or modifying the two incubators but it may have to give some money to those businesses that are to be displaced apparently according to some language in their agreement with each. I've not seen those agreements, but I can't imagine that even MATC would give money away, much of it probably to those same businesses that are behind in their rent payments, if it were not bound to do so by the agreements. Let's hope that MATC is sharp enough to hold back funds from this payment to at least recover the rental payments owed to it and to us taxpayers.
I have a high degree of difficulty in imagining that there is nothing else that can be cut out of the MATC budget. How is it that MATC will cut expenses and still have to take us taxpayers to the cleaners for 5% to 5.5% more property taxes than we paid last time? There are things that can be cut. Let's talk about staff positions to begin with. Let's look at the benefits next. Let's review the travel expenses; it seems to me that was sort of a bloated area the last time we went down this pathway. Maybe they need to sell off property and lease back the portions they actually need. Maybe they need to shake up the status quo and actually take some real action like ending the deal with the current 'King' and getting a replacement that doesn't suffer from such egotism and illogical sense of institutional direction. The Board should be capable of changing this direction unless it also suffers from something similar.
In the meantime, maybe the petitions to be removed from this system should be filed quickly and the case pressed while this iron is still hot enough to burn some sense into the directors of the state technical college system.
By the way, Waukesha County Technical College has solidified its budget with a 3% increase in property taxes. It is in the same geographic area, and faces most of the same issues. What is the difference? It seems to be leadership from my perspective.
|
By Al Campbell
Wednesday, Apr 2 2008, 06:45 AM
Random thoughts:
-
The turn-out by voters in Germantown was reported to be some 34%, as contrasted with the statewide prediction of only about 20%. That may well be a 'victory' for the group that was pushing its agenda using postcards and telephone calls. I suspect that this group stimulated a greater turnout than would've otherwise been the case. That is a good thing.
-
It seems though that the voters were not swayed sufficiently so as to follow the suggestions made by this group. Those who were criticized by this group seem to have fared well enough to win. Those who were 'favored' by not being attacked by this group didn't fare as well. Are we likely done with this kind of electioneering in Germantown? I am admittedly naive, but I'm not that naive. I expect these tactics will continue to be seen in future Germantown elections.
-
The need for some kind of solution to the school crowding in the Germantown district will have to be addressed at some point in the future. It may be that a scaled down version of the defeated proposition will find its way to a ballot later this year. If so, I suspect we'll see higher interest rates and increases in all the associated costs so that, even if the total bond issue were to be reduced, the ultimate costs could very well exceed what would've been the case with this issue. The reported 55% to 45% margin was a bit surprising; I had suspected the issue might have been outvoted by a larger number. The smaller turn-out obviously included a higher number of voters who favored the referendum. That might be expected in a non-Presidential election.
-
The face of the School Board changes a bit.
-
The state Supreme Court race was critical, in my view, and the conservative won albeit by a relatively slim margin. That bodes well for the state.
-
There is a large segment of new members elected to the Washington County Board. What that will mean can only be determined as we see the outcome of the various issues that will face this new board. I hope that we will see special attention paid to holding down spending and thus taxes. Maybe my naivite' is showing again.
-
And, the 'Frankenstein Veto' has died at the hands of the voters. That, also, is a very good thing without regard to which party might control the Governor's Mansion.
All in all, the voters have spoken and our representative form of government is working as was intended.
|
By Al Campbell
Wednesday, Jan 16 2008, 09:10 AM
Wisconsin citizens get the opportunity to vote on whether or not the 'Frankenstein Veto' should be eliminated by constitutional amendment. This was made possible when the Assembly gave its final approval yesterday.
The question will appear on the April 1st ballots.
As you'll probably remember, Governor Doyle found letters, numbers and punctuation marks across many pages of the budget to enable him to cobble together a new budget item that transferred some $470,000 from the transportation fund to another pet program that the legislature had not given him.
His spokespersons, of course, decry the elimination of this 'tool' since it gives them the opportunity to protect us from the evil legislature whenever it is misguided from Doyle's perspective.
I often disagree with legislative actions, but I have to believe that we're better off not having the governor armed with this ability. No matter your feelings about the current governor, do you want future governors to have this kind of a tool?
You will also have the opportunity to help shape the future of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, choose your state senator, vote on the school referendum and school board members, and elect county supervisors and village trustees. Mark April 1st on your calendar (and ignore the fact that this is also "April Fool's Day').
|
By Al Campbell
Tuesday, Jan 15 2008, 08:37 AM
I was listening to Jay Weber on WISN 1130 this morning and he had a proposition to resolve the smoking ban issue that had been mentioned to him by Jerry Bott at the same station.
Why not give every restaurant and tavern owner sixty days during which time they would need to decide if they were going to welcome smokers or go non-smoking entirely? Each would then be able to cater to those whom they would naturally attract. The doors would carry a big sign telling people which way this establishment had gone.
The discussion ended with the statement that this would never be tolerated by Governor Doyle and the Democrats since this debate has to be 'all or nothing' from their points of view. Giving us citizens the ability to make our own decisions is not part of the more liberal world. Of course, the 'reason' would be stated along the lines of having to protect the workers who had no choice as to where they worked.
It is as if they just know that we're too 'something' to be permitted to exercise free will since we tend to make the wrong decisions from their perspective.
As I thought about that conclusion, it seemed that there was quite a degree of truth in it. Our governing bodies do seem to feel that they have been ordained by our vote to make all life's decisions for us poor 'know-nothings'. Could it be that they draw this conclusion from the fact that each of them were elected by us in the first place? Is that how they know that we're incapable of making good decisions?
|
By Al Campbell
Saturday, Dec 15 2007, 11:38 AM
"Timing of gift questioned" was the headline of Tom Kertscher's column in the morning Journal Sentinel. That may well be a classic understatement, although I'm sure Mr. Kertscher needs to remain less 'curmudgeonly' than do I.
This is a blatant attempt to grease the skids for the denial of Germantown's soon-to-be-presented petition to the state technical college board. MATC has not presented "free" computers to any other community and yet it has done so twice now for Germantown. This coupled with the recent appointment of Germantown's Superintendent to the MATC board certainly shows that MATC is where we need to be sending our money. This provides the technical college board a 'hidey-hole' from which they can summarily dismiss our petition.
These so-called "free" computers carry a very heavy price in my opinion. The property tax increase alone to be collected from Germantown citizens will be in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Let's say, for argument, that the increase in MATC's property tax collection will be $300,000. If that were the case, then the "free" computers cost only about $15,000 each. Too tough on MATC? Okay. Let's say they'll gather only $200,000. Then each "free" computer will have only cost us about $10,000. If we add the historic annual over-payment extracted from us without a voice, the cost is in the millions of dollars for "free" laptop computers.
Then there is this whole question of accountability. Actually, there is a question as to UNaccountability. How in the world is it that this frugally-run institution can come up with this kind of money when we didn't even request their assistance? How is it that this appropriation didn't even require board approval? How is it that WCTC actually sells its used computers at the end of their useful lives, let alone not giving "free" computers to communities in its district?
It appears this could well be validation that the inmates run this asylum.
No connection? Please spare us the obvious truth-stretching. Why else would we receive this largess at this time without knowing it was coming or even having made a request for such consideration? Of course there is a connection. To try to convince us otherwise gives us a very real look into the utter disregard with which us taxpayers of Germantown are held.
We not only have no voice, we deserve no voice because we don't know enough to come in from the cold!
|
By Al Campbell
Tuesday, Oct 30 2007, 06:20 AM
The boards of the school district and village met last night to discuss common issues. Those common issues included the construction now taking place at Blackwood Creek across from the high school, the joint intent to push secession from the MATC technical college district, and the TIF district revenue shift proposed by the village.
There were no 'fireworks' as some had suggested; there were also no final decisions taken.
Representatives of MATC seemed 'lukewarm' to the TIF transfers, citing the 2003 transfer that they stated had lengthened the TIF district 3 life by two years. The school board president, Michael Erdmann, discussed the fact that the school district would be able to reduce the tax levy if the transfer were not to occur. The school district covers more taxing entities than just the village, so those entities need be considered, as well.
Village president Kempinski stated his hope that MATC would not be seeking 'retaliation' (my word) against Germantown's secession movement by not approving the TIF action. There was no reaction visible on the part of the two MATC representatives when this statement was made, but I'm sure they've had practice.
The MATC secession discussion focused on the need for uniform positions on the part of the school district and the village (both agreed but neither offered to abandon its position) with attorneys for both the village and the school district present and speaking to the boards. Since there is no haste required (the earliest date for a change in districts would be July 1, 2009 assuming the petition were filed at least ninety days prior to the end of 2008), both sides agreed to form a joint task force and to continue to work the issue.
Issues that need to be fleshed out include the negative impact to MATC as well as the positive impact to either MPTC or WCTC if Germantown were to move. The money we send to MATC is a small part of that budget, while the reduced amount that would flow to one of the others would represent a sizable increase to that district. Beyond this are all the substantive issues concerning educational opportunities in the other districts as contrasted with MATC, and which of the other districts would seem the best potential overall partner.
My take-away was this:
I don't think the TIF deal is necessarily a slam dunk, although a new project soon to commence in TIF district 4 carries much promise.
I continue to be all for the secession but am honestly skeptical as to the ultimate outcome given how everything appears stacked against us. This is a highly political battle. My estimate of the odds against our success would be in the range of 10-1, and that is probably being generous to our side. We're playing with the 'big dogs' now!
If there were any schisms between the two boards, they were well-controlled, almost to the point of being too saccharin.
|
By Al Campbell
Thursday, Oct 18 2007, 10:33 AM
The village board and the school board are running on nearly parallel routes as each researches and prepares its petition to be presented to the state technical college board.
They are each in agreement that we need to leave the MATC district for a variety of reasons.
They do not, however, appear to be in agreement about the district to which we'd prefer to be tied. The village president appears to favor Moraine Park Technical College (even thought the tax rate would be higher) while the school board vote specified Waukesha County Technical College (with the lowest tax rate of the three choices). I have been told by other trustees that the village president's position has two elements: He recognizes that we must not be a 'one-trick pony' focused solely on the tax side of the question; and that MPTC appears to be more oriented to working with Germantown on courses that are needed by our businesses.
Certainly we know that taxes alone will not suffice as the driver for our petitions. Similarly, there would be little question as to whether MPTC or WCTC would be responsive to our needs. The marketplace is driven by the hirers, not by the educators...except, of course, in the MATC system...but I digress.
The certainty that emerges is this: If we present a unified position, we stand a better chance of emerging victorious. If we present a split position, we'll almost assuredly see both petitions rejected. The state technical college board is not likely to view our petitions very favorably simply based on everything we've been told and have read. We cannot afford to be anything but fully aligned if we have a hope to prevail.
We need the village board and the school board aligned in their positions. The differences in apparent positions are not huge. The 'issues' will resolve themselves if our petitions are approved. We need alignment, and it seems to me that the village needs to move into full agreement with the school board's stated position.
It makes sense to move into the district with the lowest tax rate impact when one considers that the other benefits will be equal to the citizens of Germantown and the Germantown School District.
Incidentally, the school board has apparently learned that any petitions not filed by October 1st will, even if approved, not take effect until July 1, 2009. This is a standing policy of the state technical college board. What other obstacles will suddenly materialize as we push forward? This will be a long and strenuous battle for what is right. After all, the last time the state technical college board approved a change was in 1971 when it agreed to move Germantown into the MATC district. Lightning can certainly strike twice!
|
More Posts
|
|