MyCommunityNOW.com
Blog Home |  Email Author  |        Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

The Forum


"Neighborhood Initiative" takes aim at duplexes

By Steve Koczela
Wednesday, Oct 10 2007, 07:21 AM

A program called the "Neighborhood Initiative" is working its way through the Shorewood VIllage Board committee structure. If implemented, the program would offer assistance to duplex owners in the Village of Shorewood in upgrading their properties, or converting them to single family homes.  Several options are being discussed, including incentives to convert to single family dwellings, attic space upgrades, and down payment assistance. 

Below is an email from Trustee Dawn Anderson outlining the origins and intent of this program.

-------------------------------------------------
From: Trustee Dawn Anderson
To: Steve Koczela
Date: Sep 21, 2007

I'm not sure when this was first brought up, but I first heard of it when I joined the board last June(06). As you probably recall it is an idea that grew out of a market study on residential properties by SB Friedman and Co - the village asked for it after the Visioning Plan. They presented the study in March of 06 with recommendations on how to approach revitilization of the village's duplex stock. They identified 3 areas of concern:

1- A shortage of family appropriate housing units
2- deferred maintenance of duplexes with absentee owners and
3- overcrowding of duplexes. 

The goals of a "Neighborhood Initiative" would be to enhance housing options for young families and improve the exterior conditions of the existing "problem" duplexes. Overcrowding would be addressed through increased enforcment of code - we have yet to discuss this part of the initiative. For obvious reasons, we want the housing stock in the village to be attractive to young families and we want to protect the value of housing stock in areas that are more heavily concentrated with duplexes with absentee owners.

The CBR committee had discussed it briefly last year, with Ericka Lang tweaking some ideas as we spoke, but it did lay fallow for quite a bit of time - the shoreline ordinance and smoking ban ate up alot of the limited time we had to discuss it in committee before board meetings.... so we have just taken up discussion of it again recently.

We still are really in the preliminary stages of collecting more information and discussing the recommendations among ourselves - I can't give you cost estimates or a timeline at this point. As we move on, we'll be talking more about process and the nitty gritty of how the program might work. But at this time we are talking about incentives that will encourage upgrades/enhancements and more owner occupied duplexes.

Next week we are meeting to talk about code enforcement and how that would fit into the plan. When it might go to the full board for consideration is something I just can't say right now.
 
I hope this helps - have a nice weekend, dawn
-----------------------------------------------

Comments

Joe Mangiamele    

A comment to Trustee Dawn Anderson:

A.  We don't know which and how many duplexes can be converted into single family homes at values that would still be attractive to young families in relation to other single family homes in the area.  We might be able to determine the number and how this can be done in order to follow through with some plan of action.  This might require some subsidy.

B.   Bringing duplexes under resident ownership seems to be another of our goals.  This might make it possible for some young families to begin home ownership through some rental revenue.  Again this might require subsidy.

C.   Overcrowding would likely require an ordinance defining overcrowding and the means for regulation.  

D.   It seems that the duplex situation would require a great deal of involvement by the Shorewood government or the establishment of an agency for this purpose.

E.   I think that there are two important considerations here: a) that we clearly define our goals and b) that  we examine and determine our means for subsidy.  

Obviously the market is not going to take care of the upgrading on its own as it would have done so in the past.  Most owners are already over invested in these properties.  We should perhaps start with those absentee owners who are willing to divest themselves and the individual resident owners who need help to upgrade.  This is likely to call for various types of acquisition and for a fund for doing so.  I hope that we can get this underway as it is a important job.

October 10, 2007 11:16 AM

TrackBack   

October 17, 2007 11:49 AM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.