MyCommunityNOW.com
Blog Home |  Email Author  |  About this Blog       Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

In the Race

Now, here, you see, it takes all the blogging I can do to keep in the same place.
If I want to get somewhere else, I must blog twice as fast as that!
You see, I'm in the Red Queen's Race...

Fatty Kids (or fatty acids)?

By Janet Evans
Friday, Nov 9 2007, 12:57 AM
                                                


The latest BUMP regarding sleep and children is that third-graders need more sleep time.  Remember when we were told high school-aged children needed more sleep time a few years ago and the schools went crazy changing the start times?  We all felt a pang of guilt for not letting our teens sleep in on weekends after that was revealed, right?

Now researchers say that “of the children who slept 10 to 12 hours a day, about 12 percent were obese by sixth grade.  Many more – 22 percent – were obese in sixth grade of those who slept less than nine hours a day.    Well, excuse me, but what am I not getting here (Yes, I’m getting a bit unglued)?  How about a little less sleep and a little more exercise for the “children?”  Maybe some activity with mom and dad?  A little less gaming at night or computer time before going to bed for those 9-12 hours after that nutritious pizza dinner (yeah and how about a balanced meal, too)?

Also, what’s with the BMI (Body Mass Index).  I don’t like it.  I sit in the doctor’s office and study that chart.  I don’t see a column that says “use for big boned women.”   You can’t tell me that the BMI is going to be the same for a 5”4”  woman who has the bones of a stick figure model as it is for a thick boned, strong as a bull Latvian woman.  Sor-ry.  And now they measure the BMI for children too.

So, here is an article Lack of Sleep May Lead to Fatter Kids 

And the BMI chart for children. 

Are you as unglued” about this issue as I am?  About BMI charts?    

What do you think?



*************************************************************************************************************
On another note, I received an email from Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent of Schools, along with Gov. Jim Doyle, which included the following announcement that Wisconsin has won a competitive national grant to fight childhood obesity:

                                               **** News Release **** 

Wisconsin wins grant to combat childhood obesity

Wisconsin has won a competitive national grant to fight childhood obesity. Wisconsin was one of 15 states to receive Healthy Kids, Healthy America awards from the National Governors Association, which chose to fully fund the state's request for $100,000.

The funding will go toward the Healthier Wisconsin Schools initiative and will support the Governor's School Health Award initiative.

"We are pleased that the NGA has recognized the work being done here in Wisconsin, and we will use this grant to continue our efforts to reduce the rates of overweight and obesity among our youngest citizens," said Governor Jim Doyle.

"A healthy school environment, where students are encouraged to make healthier choices and to be more physically active, helps them to achieve their full academic potential as well as supporting them in developing lifelong healthy behaviors," said State Superintendent Elizabeth Burmaster.

The grant will fund work to help Wisconsin increase the number of Wisconsin school-age children who eat the recommended daily amount of fruits and vegetables, increase the number of Wisconsin school-age children who meet daily physical activity recommendations, and decrease the number of Wisconsin school-age children who are overweight or at risk for becoming overweight.


$100,000.  "WOW, I thought.  NOW that will go far. 

So, I made a few calls.  First, I called the Food Service Manager, Monica Houtler, at Franklin Public Schools and inquired as to whether our district had ever benefited from this program.  Monica said she was not aware of the program.  We had a great chat and she informed me of the all she does to give our students healthy food choices, within her means.  She also reminded me of the Wellness Program, which is implemented through our District’s Strategic Plan.  I was impressed with Monica Houtler, and FPS should be too.   

Next I spoke with
Brian Weaver, Student Services/Prevention and Wellness Team at the Dept. of Public Instruction, in Madison. I asked him if any suburban schools receive any of the $100,000, or does it all go to MPS.  He said no schools had been selected for this money yet, and that the money would be assigned to schools that had applied.  He also said money would go to schools that had NOT applied, but that hadn’t been determined.  We both agreed $100,000 would not go a long way.  He agreed with me that there are not many programs, nor money, state or federal, to fight obesity in schools. 

Personally, I think this is just a nice NEWS RELEASE for Burmaster and Doyle and by the time I was done being transferred around at DPI, I was pretty unglued. 

I don't even know about asking you what you think on this one, but, O.K., I will.
 

Here I go.

So, what do you think?

Comments

Advocating Mom   

Hi Janet, you have really hit a nerve with me on this topic. I have two elementary school students in FPS and I become particularly unglued nearly every Tuesday when the hot lunch du jour is  Domino's Pizza.  Not that I'm morally opposed to pizza -- we eat it alot -- I just don't think it is appropriate to innundate our kids with that kind of corporate advertising.  It does nothing to help the problem.

I agree, $100,000 will do nothing.  It is simply the government's mentality that they can solve a problem by throwing money at it.  I think the solution to fighting obesity in schools is simple and inexpensive.  I would suggest the state's time and money would be better spent revising the standards for school lunches.  Every hot lunch should provide a FRESH fruit, a FRESH vegetable, a WHOLE GRAIN bread/starch option, and a LEAN protein.  I am not a registered dietician but I play one at home.  I don't think it is that hard to figure out.

Many will argue that we have to offer options that the kids will eat. That's a cop out.  Schools need to clamp down on the kinds of snacks that the children are being allowed to eat in the classroom.  I have witnessed a second grader pull a family sized bag of barbecue potato chips out of her desk and proceed to nosh away the entire afternoon.  This is unacceptable.  When I approached the teacher about this her response was "I tell parents to send healthy options".  That's not enough.  She should have taken the bag of chips, thrown them in the garbage, and told the child to never bring that snack again.  It costs the district no money to get tough on the snacking.  Why should a kid eat a healthy hot lunch when they know they can eat chips all afternoon?

It is simply a lack of accountability in our schools that no amount of money will fix.

The problem is not how to fight obesity in the schools...the real problem is how to fight obesity in the home.  Maybe we can get unglued about that in another blog....

November 9, 2007 7:11 AM

Fred Keller   

Great piece, Janet! Okay...you got me, I'm "unglued!"

Can you say: F.U.B.A.R.?

And Doyle and state Dems want government to run healthcare?

Here's my "White Paper" on fat kids:

Eating junk food in excess will make kids fat.

Inactive kids are fat.

The End.

November 9, 2007 7:26 AM

J. Strupp   

I agree.  The BMI is a joke.  Not only does the BMI not take into account a person's body shape, but it fails to take into account lean muscle mass vs. fat tissue.  There is a good chance that if you are an athlete, you will be considered overweight due to above average muscle tissue.  Supposedly, the BMI takes this into account but I seriously doubt it.  You can't calculate these things with a chart.  

As for the increase in childhood obesity, schools can go a long way in improving the childhood obesity by eliminating the availability of one thing......soda machines.  Probably the single worst thing you can put in your body hands down.  Take away soda from an obese kid's diet and I'll bet you money they drop weight, feel better and have more energy in a matter of a couple weeks.  That goes for adults too.    

November 9, 2007 10:45 AM

Janet Evans   

Advocating Mom:

Thank you for your comments -

I will be glad to discuss obesity in another blog.  

Your points about the food in the schools are right on.  My discussion with the Food Service Mgr. told me she does the best she can with what is available to her.  It sounds pretty limited (my words).  The state is not providing any money or help to school districts for better meals.  And maybe when they see the kids throwing food away, they think, well, we have to give them something, or they won't eat.  

I think we need to have more parents on the next strategic planning committee (and Wellness Committee) next time it comes around.

Fred -

How many families do you know that sit down and have a balanced meal every night for dinner?  When my kids were still home, their friends liked coming over because I still cooked that every night.  Now its take your kid to a sport, watch the sport, stop for fast food on the way home.  So they get the activity and then counter it with fat calories.  

Everyone is in a hurry.  Nobody is cooking anymore.  YES -  F.U.B.A.R.

Josh -

ANYONE can lose 10 pounds by cutting out soda.  I did.  Schools get money from the advertising the Pepsi or Coke companies give them.

November 9, 2007 11:53 AM

franklin parent of 3   

Advocating Mom is right on!  FPS School lunch program is absolutely pathetic and no one is willing to do ANYTHING about it.  The whole wellness committee that was formed from the strategic planning committee was alot of fluff when it came to our lunch program.

We serve ALOT of bread and cheese - way too much!  And I cant seem to figure out why we have to offer chocolate and stawberry milk to our children at every chance we get. As a parent of 3 elementary age children, I dont know many children that would pass up the opportunity to "drink" all the extra sugar that is in these flavored 2% milks.  Why not eliminate those and only offer 2% (which my kids dont drink) and skim?

In addition to the lousy lunch options, the teachers are then allowing (and in some instances encouraging!!) lots of candy and treat comsumption on a daily basis.  They give candy as daily rewards and incentives for completing tasks and assignments. And then there's the once a month movie day or Fun Friday where everyone brings in sodas, candy and treats to gorge on! ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!

Can you tell that this Wellness Committee is a hot spot for me? I think there are a lot of other parents out there that are concerned as well and need a way to BE HEARD.  Calls to Monica Houtler dont getcha very far in my experience.

November 11, 2007 11:17 PM

Janet Evans   

Wow, Franklin Parent ... You and Advocating Mom seem to really have first-hand experience at the elementary/middle school level.  Somehow I think my discussion with Monica Houtler focused more on the high school.  Did you talk with her personally?

One thing about the food service manager ... she reports directly to the Business Manager, Jim Milzer and is at that departments mercy regarding funding, etc.

I will wait a bit longer to see what other messages I receive and forward them on to Milzer and the school board.  

In the meantime, to the best of my knowledge the Strategic Plan can't be changed.  Not until they meet again and change it.  But I think the Wellness committe must meet regularly.  

Have you contacted the committee?

November 12, 2007 12:08 AM

Unglued   

Fat Kids...Are Working Moms to Blame?

January 14, 2008 7:18 AM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.