MyCommunityNOW.com
Blog Home |  Email Author  |        Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

Paul's Falls

I have lived in the Falls since 1968. My great-great grandfather was one of the village founders. I have served the community in multiple ways: Firefighter, various boards and commissions and for many years was president of the Falls Cable Access Corp. Currently I own, and am active in, a restaurant equipment manufacturing company.

My Cable TV Bill is Tumbling - Not

By Paul Wickesberg
Thursday, Jul 3 2008, 11:00 AM

 After a year's hype cable television now has serious competition.  All last year the phone company ran ads claiming that once a new law was passed the Citizens of Wisconsin would be on easy street.  A bill was in the works that would allow phone companies to provide television without paying a franchise fee to local governments. The claim was that new competition would force the cable operators to quit gouging us and lower prices. It was implied that the phone company would enter the market with significantly cheaper rates for equal service.  Every day the broadcast commercials told us to contact our legislators and demand that the new law be passed.  How nice it would be to actually pay fair prices for video service.

The law was passed.  Anyone (in the Milwaukee area)  can now sign up with AT&T and bring in video programs over the phone lines.  But guess what.  Their rates are basically the same as the cable operator. Poof....suddenly the commercials no longer talk about lower rates but instead focus on an old woman watching TV in an odd-shaped bed.

Oh, by the way, my TV bills have increased.  So much for the benefits of competition!
 

Comments

Dave Wyrwas   

Responding To Paul Wickesberg "competitive cable pricing" article (July 10,2008): Paul did not state what services companies he was comparing. Prior to September 2007, our Time-Warner Cable bill was $73.15. It included only basic and 2nd tier programming. It did not include any premium pay channels. The bill included a rental fee of about $8 for digital box. It did not include the NFL Channel or Big Ten Network. Separately, our DSL Internet bill was $29 (total $102).

In September, 2008, we signed up for AT&T U-Verse. This program included cable TV and high speed internet (without DSL). Monthly billing has been $92.25 since inception. TV service includes 2 digital boxes & digital video recorder - at no charge; NFL CHANNEL & BIG TEN NETWORK, INCLUDED.

Recently AT&T have been advertising (dish)TV, internet and phone services

under a separate program from AT&T U-Verse.

(I hope I'm using proper terminolgy): Time Warner uses analog 'broadcasting' (it has something to do with wiring). There is a big contrast difference when you switch to high definition for same channel. AT&T uses digital 'broadcasting.' There is very little contrast difference between regular and high def programs. High Def is a little clearer/sharper.  Included in my payment is $10 for high def programmimg. My previous total billing was $102. Yes, the difference is only about $8. Yet, I get unlimited no charge digital boxes; unlimited channel program directories; and most importantly, 2 channels not now available from TW - NLF & Big Ten. There is more VALUE with AT&T U-Verse.

What company does Paul have now, where he said his bill increased? I don't remember those TV ads implying significantly lower rates than what existing companies offered. Those ads were asking the state legislature for competitive choices to the 'monopolistic' cable firms. I don't really know what Paul is whining about.  

July 11, 2008 3:56 PM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.