MyCommunityNOW.com
Blog Home |  Email Author  |  About this Blog       Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

Practically Speaking

Kyle and her husband moved to Brookfield in 1986. She became active in local politics and started blogging in 2004. Her focus is primarily on local issues but often includes state and national topics, too. Kyle looks at things from the taxpayers’ perspective in a creative, yet down to earth way, addressing them from a practical point of view.

4-K: THE DOG CHASING ITS TAIL (Revised)

By Kyle Prast
Monday, Oct 8 2007, 11:37 PM

Oh, what a surprise. Tonight, Elmbrook to discuss more 4-year-old kindergarten in a non-videotaped work session.

Ever notice how many trial or temporary government programs become permanent and expanded? Social Security and the increase in Wisconsin's 4% sales tax to 5% back in, was it Lee Dreyfus' day(?) are two good examples of government that just keeps growing.

Elmbrook's 4-K government program is no different. What started as a temporary, small trial basis soon will become a bloated taxpayer funded daycare project under the guise of It's for the children.

The Community Watch blurb stated, "According to a memo to the School Board, a permanent 4-K program would produce more revenue than it would cost starting in the 2010-'11 school year. Those extra funds could be used to pay other expenses throughout the district."

But get this,"It would, however, cost the taxpayers more money, because it would be funded primarily from increased property taxes. The district would be allowed to collect more taxes due to its increased enrollment."

Who is it really for?

Ever think that one reason they need those 4 year olds in school, instead of with mom, is so that mom can go back to work sooner? Of course they will try to persuade the public that the earlier the child enters the educational system the better they will do in school. I've spoken to this issue before, but if you missed that, the stats do not prove this out. Any head start evens out at around 5th grade.

So what is the real reason for sending these tykes to school? After all, it costs the taxpayers money to do it. And that, to me, is one of the reasons they are pushing this agenda: It costs taxpayers money to send 4 year olds to school. Families cannot easily afford these and other ever increasing taxes. Therefore enable mom to go back to work sooner. Then she can help contribute to the family's income, to afford the ever increasing taxes!

Obviously, it grows the Empire of Elmbrook, and 4-K enables moms to work, to fund the empire.

Dual income families are less likely to notice the bite taxes are taking out of the family budget than single income ones. 

Just once I would like to see some program discontinued because it was not cost effective! If we are not careful, we may soon need to add another S to USA. (United States of Socialist Americans)

 

P.S. You might want to ask yourself if you really think the 4-K program will stay at the half day level and then ask yourself why Elmbrook expanded half day 5-K to all day.

One reader emailed me that many Elmbrook moms are more interested in playing while their little darling was in kindergarten than needing to go to work. I would agree, but one reason we were given for implementing all day 5-K and half day 4-K is that we need to to be competitive with other districts. In other school districts, I would guess that working moms are more than happy to avail themselves of the free daycare.



 

Filed under:
Permalink |  Mail to a friend

Comments

Cheri M.   

Our forefathers founded this nation with personal liberties second only to God.  It is a shame how people think that will continue forever, just because it has always been that way.  There are changes afoot which usurp our decision making ability as parents, well as our financial ability to follow through on plans.  

The government may have many studies to quote or some might say misquote from, they may have highly credentialed experts.  

But they're unable to LOVE my child. They're unable to KNOW my child as well as I do. In their secular realm, they simply cannot impart the infinite sense of worth in being a Child of God.  While they may raise an ethical child, they cannot raise a moral, God-loving child with a well-spring of spiritual reserves.  Children who are grounded in these riches, found primarily in the pre-schoolers' homes, benefit more from absorbing this than from performing their ABC's on command to receive praise as though self-worth depended upon such things.

The change from participation in a preschool or daycare program to 4K may seem subtle at first glance, but the change is from parents setting the pace (taking vacations, playdates, family fieldtrips etc at will) to surrending to a school schedule and rhythm that is rather imposed. When parents are paying for these programs, they remain in charge.  Children benefit from observing that their parents have special interest in them and that family comes first.  There is plenty of time for both parents and children to practice conformity and assimilation in the school years that follow.

Accepting district tax dollars to fund these programs may at first glance seem like a "win" to those whose children attend for free, but eventually parents will realize that their dollars as consumers purchased a good measure of freedom and decision-making latittude which does not exist when someone else is paying the bill.  The district will become the daycare's paying customer, the one to please.  

October 9, 2007 2:47 PM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.

Posts

Your browser must support javascript to use the posts pager. Please enable javascript or return to the home page to page through posts.
Newer Older

Tags

How the other half lives

Search the Blogs