I noted Cindy's blog referral to the comments on Brookfieldnow. I missed them too. It looks like many of us are on the same page!
My Alderman, Lisa Mellone, requested comments about the fire stations on Sept. 24th. The following were my comments to the city:
If we are following what the Task Force recommended, then why are
not the other 3 possible Greenfield locations being discussed? I
believe they should be brought to the table too.
I still strongly believe that our station is already in the right
place. I can see that a location on Greenfield between Moorland and
Calhoun might speed up dispatch to easterly district 7 locations and
destinations to the west too. (It does not help the Brookfield
Square/hot zone or interstate calls though.) There would not be any
need to negotiate pulling out onto Moorland from Hackberry or from
Moorland onto Greenfield, if it already was on Greenfield.
The NW corner is really a mistake if we are trying to aid dispatch
to the north via Calhoun. There is no easy way for a NW corner property
to dispatch trucks northbound from a busy boulevard intersection! Since
this was one of the main reasons that Chief Dahms gave for favoring the
new alignment (when I met with him), the NW corner seems to be the most inferior station
location for this purpose. Placing it on NW Calhoun would also cause
some delay for calls to the east because the light/intersection must be
taken into consideration as well as the greater distance. If we are
truly trying to balance response times, these two locations, NW Calhoun
and NE Calhoun, fail miserably.
It is my nature to "Never say die". If there is something that still can be done to look at this again, I am all for it. The encouraging thing is that 7 aldermen voted to NOT place the fire station on that NW corner.