MyCommunityNOW.com
Blog Home |  Email Author  |  About this Blog       Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

Practically Speaking

Kyle and her husband moved to Brookfield in 1986. She became active in local politics and started blogging in 2004. Her focus is primarily on local issues but often includes state and national topics, too. Kyle looks at things from the taxpayers’ perspective in a creative, yet down to earth way, addressing them from a practical point of view.

Someone's got to be the grownup and say NO - UPDATE

By Kyle Prast
Monday, Oct 15 2007, 07:41 AM

I saw in the Sunday paper that the Governor was sweetening the pot on the 2nd state budget in an effort to "tempt enough Republicans in votes that would help it squeeze through the Assembly on Monday."

The thought came to me, that this whole can't we have all this spending, please approve my budget, and if you vote for my budget, I will give you this favor, reminded me of a whiny child and a parent.

Most children are very versed in negotiating deals. You know, the Mom, can't I stay up until 11pm? If you let me, I will clean my room tomorrow. Or, Dad, I really need that new pair of $400 ski boots. If you buy them for me, I will shovel all the snow. Or how about, Why can't I eat chocolate cake for breakfast? Kids will often just keep asking until they wear down the poor parent's resolve and get their way.

But good parents know they often have to remain firm in their beliefs and say no to their children. They must act responsibly and weigh the request against the need. They must factor in the requests impact to the family dynamics and budget. Saying no to some requests may make us feel badly, but to indulge the child would not be good in the long run. We know we cannot grant every request; its what makes us the grownup!

I can only hope our legislators in Madison will act like grownups and be firm in their pledges to not raise taxes--not even for a tempting piece of pork!  

UPDATE: My Representative Leah Vukmir just called to let me know that she put on high heels today so she could really dig in her heels on the budget! I asked if she had received a lot of calls about the budget and she said YES. The vast majority were urging her to not approve any new taxes or fees. Our conversation was cut short because she was being called to the floor.

Stand firm, Leah, stand firm! 

Comments

intewedm   

Inspite of the MJS and Democrats pretending we have not budget, the fact is that the previous budget remains in effect and the spending levels remain the same.  For the taxpayer that is a very GOOD thing!  I have spoken to Zipperer and Kanavas and urged them not to submit any budget without a written promise from Doyle that he will not use his veto pen to rewrite sentences/paragraphs to create completely new items.  A veto means to delete something, not rewrite it, and Doyle abused his power and needs to be held accountable.  Compared to the massive tax increases disguised at "fees", the property tax increases they are predicting would probably be the lesser of evils.  I can't understand why voters keep voting for the "tax and spenders".  I hope the Republicans hold the line and find a way to get the liberal media to report honestly what the issues are.  Democrats are as dishonest with the taxpayers as can be imagined and get away with it!  On the federal level, the SCHIP fiasco is another example of the Dems lying,

the Repubs (Prez) standing up to them, and the media not telling us the truth of what's happening.  Watch Glenn Beck!

October 15, 2007 9:08 AM

ShawnMatson   

On a national level who took the largest surplus in US History and turned it in the largest deficit in US history?

I'll give you a hint: it wasn't the liberals and the left-wing media!

October 15, 2007 10:33 AM

Kyle Prast   

Shawn: We are not talking about the national level here. I am addressing our state that is way out of control in its spending. We need to do the responsible thing and say NO to increases in an already bloated budget.

By the way, just because one group (regardless of party affiliation) approves excessive spending and pork does not justify continuing on that path.

Many CONSERVATIVES are NOT happy with the spending spree Washington, Wisconsin, and Brookfield have been on, nor are CAPITALISTS happy with the move toward socialism and redistribution of wealth that is becoming business as usual in all levels of government.

October 15, 2007 12:36 PM

ShawnMatson   

I was addressing Intewedm.

October 15, 2007 1:19 PM

intewedm   

Well said Kyle.  Shawn, like most liberals, seems to think that the Democrats haven't been filling the budgets with their own pork projects every year and have plans for massive tax and spend projects.  It's easy to hold down deficits if you raise taxes, but we would like to see the politicians least preferred choice of eliminating pork and increasing government efficiency.  They think that won't get them votes, but I have a feeling that it would in fact get them more votes from appreciative taxpayers even if the freeloaders aren't happy.  They are in the minority I believe.

October 15, 2007 1:46 PM

ShawnMatson   

I never said that.  They both have been--just don't forget to target both Democrats and Republicans in your crusades.

October 15, 2007 8:20 PM

testosterone   

"even if the freeloaders aren't happy.  They are in the minority I believe."

Well said INT. And especially on this most auspicious day when the FIRST person OFFICIALLY RECOGNIZED as a Baby Boomer applied for her Social Security.

We won't be a minority too much longer. Better put that flashy blue mustang and rosey red harley up for sale TEWED - taxes are about to soar!

October 15, 2007 9:58 PM

intewedm   

Hey, testy, I'm set unless the coming economic collapse occurs before I exit the scene.  The Mustang and Harley are paid for and safe for the time being.  I hope you noticed that the first boomer to retire did it EARLY!  Wouldn't you think that the least the politicians would do is prohibit collecting social security early?  When the program was instituted few people lived to 65.  Now we routinely live to 80 and allow people to start collecting at 62.  Our politicians just have no common sense.  Not only that everybody and their brother can collect some sort of benefit from SSI!  How many people pretend to be unable to work and collect what should be retirement benefits for those who DID work?  God save us from ourselves and the government!

October 16, 2007 10:13 AM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.

Posts

Your browser must support javascript to use the posts pager. Please enable javascript or return to the home page to page through posts.
Newer Older

Tags

How the other half lives

Search the Blogs