MyCommunityNOW.com
Blog Home |  Email Author  |  About this Blog       Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

Practically Speaking

Kyle and her husband moved to Brookfield in 1986. She became active in local politics and started blogging in 2004. Her focus is primarily on local issues but often includes state and national topics, too. Kyle looks at things from the taxpayers’ perspective in a creative, yet down to earth way, addressing them from a practical point of view.

Thank you, Leah, for voting NO

By Kyle Prast
Wednesday, Oct 24 2007, 08:35 AM

The state budget passed. There was compromise.  I am not happy about it.

I am really disappointed in Speaker Mike Huebsch. For all the no tax increase posturing he did prior to the vote, it seems he gave in to the idea that increases were OK as long as they weren't horribly high. With that kind of thinking we will never get spending under control!

The real goal should be to reduce spending, not just tailor the increases to what someone thinks we can afford. There is nothing wrong with government leaving a little extra money in your pocket at the end of the day. That extra is what we use to fund our savings, retirement, college, and charitable giving accounts.

JSOnline reported, "Huebsch touted the budget as one that keeps governent spending in line with taxpayers' ability to pay, but Rep. Leah Vukmir (R-Wauwatosa), a no-tax-increase pledge signer, disagreed."

" ' This is not a Republican budget, it is a Democratic budget; and it's riddled with earmarks and favors and new spending that we simply cannot afford,' she said."  

Some fees/taxes/surcharges or whatever you want to call them were eliminated--there won't be the bed tax or oil company tax. But there will be hefty new fees and taxes--$763.2 million of them. The $274 million increase in drivers license/car title fees and the $200 million raiding of malpractice funds along with the new cigarette tax are excessive. Granted, the estimated $378.5 million new cigarette tax probably irritates only the smokers, but on principle, it is wrong. I don't want anyone to smoke, but which group will they stab next to target for a new tax?  

Anyway, I am glad to report that Brookfield's 3 Republican legislators voted NO to this budget. By the way, I would have been even happier if our one Democrat Senator Sullivan had voted NO too. This is not a Republican or Democrat issue; it is simply a case of controlling unbridled spending.

If you are pleased with Brookfield's 3 legislators, Rep. Vukmir, Rep. Zipperer, and Senator Kanavas, who voted NO, take a moment to tell them. While you are at it, share your thoughts with Senator Sullivan, Rep. J. Fitzgerald, and Rep. Huebsch, who voted YES. 

No votes:

State Representative Leah Vukmir, Republican, 14th District
Representative Rich Zipperer, Republican, 98th District
State Senator Theodore Kanavas, Republican, 33rd District

Yes votes:

State Senator Jim Sullivan, Democrat, 5th District
Rep. Jeff Fitzgerald (Assembly Majority Leader)
Rep. Michael Huebsch (Assembly Speaker)

Comments

intewedm   

"That extra is what we use to fund our savings, retirement, college, and charitable giving accounts."

Kyle, you don't seem to understand the future as envisioned by our elected representatives.  Big Brother will take care of all of us and we needed worry about savings, retirement, or college.  You shouldn't be giving to charity anyhow because government needs the money.  That['s] the future if Americans don't wake up!

 

Kyle's reply: We are on the same page; I know the plan. What I don't understand is why people are not more concerned about how big government is getting.

 

October 24, 2007 10:15 AM

intewedm   

It is human nature to want without earning.  If you notice how many countries that made up the former Soviet Union are unhappy with democratic capitalism.  Poland just elected Socialists and they want their cheap rent and cheap bread even if it means being under the jackboots of their leaders. Unfortunately ever since FDR and the Great Depression politicians have been promising to "give" people what they need at the expense of the wealthy.  More and more people have bought into this idea and that's what motivates most Democrat voters...envy and sloth.  Does anyone think the politicians really care about the poor?  Ha!  The promises to give them something that they don't have to work for is a magnet and that's why they are courting the illegals.  Figure out a way for them to vote and get those votes for your Party.  Americans by and large are completely uninvolved in anything other than a quest to get "stuff" and to get pleasure.  It's hard to understand that they don't see traditional values slipping away.  Look at Europe sliding inexorably into Islam control and they are complete blind to it.  It's too late for them now in my opinion, and we are in the sights of the Islamists.  I think tolerance is ignorant when it leads to your downfall!

October 24, 2007 10:47 AM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.

Posts

Your browser must support javascript to use the posts pager. Please enable javascript or return to the home page to page through posts.
Newer Older

Tags

How the other half lives

Search the Blogs