MyCommunityNOW.com
Blog Home |  Email Author  |  About this Blog       Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

Practically Speaking

Kyle and her husband moved to Brookfield in 1986. She became active in local politics and started blogging in 2004. Her focus is primarily on local issues but often includes state and national topics, too. Kyle looks at things from the taxpayers’ perspective in a creative, yet down to earth way, addressing them from a practical point of view.

Déjà vu: Obama Is Like Having Jimmy Carter All Over Again!

By Kyle Prast
Wednesday, Jun 11 2008, 10:47 AM

 

Barack Obama would prefer that most people think he is John Kennedy the 2nd. But where Kennedy said, "Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country", Obama seems to have an opposite campaign theme: Don't do anything for yourself that the government could do for you.

No, to me, Obama more closely resembles former President Jimmy Carter. They both favor negotiating with terrorists and both seem anti-semitic. They also both share the same opinion on windfall profit taxes for oil companies.

"'SPEAKING OF WINDFALL PROFITS',  Barack Obama said yesterday [Monday] that he wants to impose a "windfall profits tax" on American oil companies. This is a stupid idea, unless you want to reduce the supply of oil and thereby increase prices even further." Barack Obama said Monday:

"I'll make oil companies like Exxon pay a tax on their windfall profits, and we'll use the money to help families pay for their skyrocketing energy costs and other bills," the Illinois senator said.

That same Reuters piece mentioned that "CRITICS SAY TAX DOES NOT WORK": (My emphasis)

Critics of the windfall profits tax say it proved to be counterproductive when it was last put in place in the United States in 1980 during the final year of President Jimmy Carter's administration.

Those critics say the measure prompted oil companies to cut back on domestic production while failing to raise as much in tax revenue as lawmakers expected. It was repealed in 1988 during the Reagan administration.

What's that saying about history? Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it? That's  Change we can't afford:  

“At a time when American families face record gas and energy prices, Barack Obama has called for even higher energy taxes. At the center of Barack Obama’s plan is a scheme last tried under Jimmy Carter that only increased our dependence on foreign oil. We shouldn’t expect anything more from a politician who has consistently voted to increase taxes on energy, including natural gas purchases in Illinois. Barack Obama doesn’t understand the American economy and that’s change we just can’t afford.”

BARACK OBAMA’S PLAN TO INCREASE ENERGY TAXES WILL HURT AMERICAN CONSUMERS (from the McCain campaign.)

Barack Obama is trying to call a McCain presidency George Bush's 3rd term. Tuesday I heard John McCain fire back that an Obama presidency would be Carter's 2nd term.

I don't believe McCain would be a 3rd Bush term, but if we are going to have a rerun...I know which presidency I would pick.


Links:

counter hit xanga

Brookfield7, Fairly Conservative, Betterbrookfield,
Mark Levin , Vicki Mckenna

Comments

intewedm   

There are so many reasons not to have the Democrats control Congress and the White House for anyone who isn't socialistic, but I think the most important reason is that we would get horrible Supreme Court justices who will override the Constitution and conform our system to the world courts...and that will be the end of U.S. democracy as we have known it.  All the uninformed (or un-Americans) who want to see that happen are increasing in numbers, and just as Canada, Central and South America, and Europe have become socialist, so too will we.

June 11, 2008 10:59 AM

mikeyd   

Hi Kyle,

In case you didn't realize, Your blog headline is election rhetoric. I dislike press repeated rhetoric, it is just hot air, I prefer to see what plans are put on paper for my candidates. I think too many people base votes on the latest headline and who gets who better at the right time. It seems like both of the candidates are blowing alot of hot air, it is time for real head to head debates for sure.

But Whatever McCain says, even though you have admitted to not caring much for him, is now fact and should be pasted up in bold letters.

I would say Obama seems to be a mix between Kennedy and Carter, leaning much more toward Kennedy. McCain would be part Bush (unfortunately some of the worst parts, ie. Go War Go), and part who?  I am not sure, he tried to be an outsider, but seems over the years to be falling directly in line when it helps him gather funds, and then hides from the camera so he isn't on the front page associating with the president.  It reminds me of Gore and Clinton when Gore was distancing himself while driving to be the candidate. I didn't think that type of situation would repeat itself so soon on the other side of the aisle this time...

Kyle's reply: I was in Jr. High during Kennedy and a young married during Carter. It is hard for me to imagine anyone wanting to go back to the Carter years. Were you an adult during either administration?

P.S. This is a blog, not hard news, and from time to time, I do post a Deja Vu piece. Obama reminds me a lot of Carter, both in their inexperience and naivete'. 

June 11, 2008 12:22 PM

leapin   

Isn't it interesting that those too young or those too ignorant of history view policies that are old and have been tried before as

unprecedented change ?

June 12, 2008 12:03 PM

Cindy   

Oh, Kyle. Where's the common sense MikeyD's statement? I know he's an intelligent man. How can he not get that TAXING a corporation is going to increase the cost down the road to those purchasing their product? He doesn't even acknowledge the truth in your effort.

Bummer. It sure seems like he's got blinders on this time.

June 13, 2008 8:09 AM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.

Posts

Tags

How the other half lives

Search the Blogs