MyCommunityNOW.com
Blog Home |        Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join
Browse By tag All Tags » Light Rail (RSS)

Related Tags

The Reasoning Behind the Ban on Overnight Parking In the Shorewood (or the BAY)??

By David Tatarowicz
Sunday, Jun 29 2008, 01:21 PM

On   Whitefishbaynow.com is an excellent blogger, Kevin Buckley, who recently wrote a posting about getting a ticket for parking overnight in front of his house ----  (you can read his entire posting at:

http://blogs.whitefishbaynow.com/village_spillage/archive/2008/06/18/took-10-years.aspx)

Some excerpts from his posting:

 " We've lived in Whitefish Bay 10 years and it finally happened. 

We woke up one morning and my wife said .. "Oh, crap.  We left the car in the street over-night."  

Maybe we won't have a ticket, I foolishly thought.  Maybe they saw our car and thought, hey, I know that car.  I'll bet they just forgot to pull their car into their driveway.  No need to penalize them.

Not a chance .. there, in blaze orange was our $15 night-parking ticket.

Man, I hate that law.  How does $7,000 in yearly property taxes not give you the right to park in front of your house? 

I can't say I understand the premise of the 3am-5am parking restriction.  To prevent crime?  Not sure I believe that.  The car parked next to my house is far more hidden than one on the street.   To control the number of cars each household can own?  That doesn't make much sense, as if you have a long driveway, you could easily park a half-dozen cars on your drive.   Maybe it's so the street sweepers can do a good job.  Of course, they don't roll at 3am-5am, so that's no good.

Seriously, if anyone knows the theory behind this law, I'd love to hear it. "

 


I wrote some Comments back to Kevin regarding overnight parking ......

Kevin

Like many laws, the one prohibiting overnight parking was passed for one reason --- while another one --- Crime --- was used as both the obstensible reason and also "CODE" for the Real Reason.

And like every law that has outlived the original reason for its being --- if it generates revenue, the politicians will NEVER take it off the books.

Almost all collar suburbs of metropolitan areas had these no overnight parking laws, to control who came in and out of the municipality.  (Read between the lines --- keep the Blacks out of town).  

I would guess that at one time, Whitefish Bay also had covenants on the property deeds (as many, many suburbs did), which restricted a sale of the property to certain groups, such as Colored and Jewish.

The Civil Rights laws of the 60's made all those racist covenants non-binding and unenforceable, but they would still be recorded on the paperwork with the Register of Deeds.

Interestingly, the same tactics are used today, by politicians who fight against light rail to the outer suburbs.

Those suburbs have gobbled up jobs with low cost industrial park development, but now they have a problem of getting the low cost labor from the Central City out to where the jobs are.

Light rail would indeed be a solution to the labor problem, but it would create a new problem by making travel to the predominantly White suburbs, easy for the Lower Class Blacks from the City !!

In fact in the good old bad days, when there were streetcars that ran into the suburbs like Whitefish Bay and Shorewood, it was not uncommon for the police chief or cop to see who was getting off, and ask them why they were coming to town.

The stripping away of rights and constitutional guarantees did not start with Bush and Cheney -- they have been around a long time and are always just below the surface, waiting for some ---any reason --- for the officials to try to strip them away, in the name of National Security ---- or Crime Prevention !!!

So when you pay that ticket, you can at least take cold comfort in the fact that the prevailing attitude of keeping the Bay Whitefolks is not as prevalent as before --- but they still want your money --- because they can get it and claim to be keeping taxes down.

Dave

 

WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT OVERNIGHT PARKING IN SHOREWOOD?  YOUR COMMENTS ARE APPRECIATED !! 


 

Scott Walker Lacks the Vision Needed to Lead Milwaukee County

By David Tatarowicz
Thursday, Nov 1 2007, 03:01 PM

Following is an invitation I received (along with a whole lot of other folks) for a fun raiser for Scott Walker, and a copy of my response to the invitation.

 Dear Perfecto

 
I wholeheartedly agree with you that Milwaukee is important to Southeastern Wisconsin --- and actually Wisconsin as a whole.
 
Unfortunately Scott Walker seems more interested in courting the favor of the collar county Republicans (possible run for governor or senator ?) , than in working to make Milwaukee into a true World Class City - County - and Region.
 
Our economic zones are no longer distinct -- Milwaukee, Madison, Green Bay, Fox Cities -- etc, are all dependent upon each other ---  and in fact we are part of an economic zone that is interstate and includes Chicago.
 
The lack of vision to nurture Milwaukee County in conjunction with the City of Milwaukee and the Collar Counties -- and yes Chicago,  via "rail" for an example,  stymies the growth and economies of cooperation that are sorely needed.
 
We need a leader with the foresight to work in building our transportation systems, including all aspects of road, bus, rail and air -- and to rejuvenate the Inner City which has suffered disproportionately from White Flight,  the continued deterioration of the school system, and the lack of jobs within the community or the ability to viably access those that are in the collar counties.
 
Unfortunately, Scott Walker is not that person of vision.  Under his leadership, we have not only not moved forward --- but we have lost ground with some of our greatest treasures, such as the once vaunted Park System.
 
Sincerely,
 
Dave Tatarowicz

Perfecto Rivera <privera@wi.rr.com> wrote:
#yiv2105257753 st1\:*{}
Dear Friend,
 
“How Milwaukee goes, so goes Southeastern Wisconsin ”
 
This is an invitation to join me and our host Bob Spindell for an evening of food, drinks and live harp music with County Executive Scot Walker this Saturday November 3, 2007 from 6 – 9 PM.
 
This fund raising event will be hosted and held at the home of Bob Spindell, located at 1626 North Prospect Avenue #2209 – Milwaukee , WI .
 
General Attendance - $30
Roundtable Discussion and Photo with Scott - $100
 
RSVP, directions and other information: Contact me at (414) 559-7957 or Bob Spindell at (414) 985-5353
 
I hope to see you on Saturday ……. Perfecto.

 

Light Rail --- A Shot of Vitality for Shorewood and the Northshore

By David Tatarowicz
Monday, Oct 15 2007, 07:44 PM

In today's Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, was a proposed Light Rail plan by Michael  Cudahy. 

I won't repeat his reasoning for Light Rail here.  If you are interested and don't have today's paper, you can look it up online at http://www.jsonline.com/

The initial line he proposes, in part, comes from downtown up Farwell and Prospect (one way on each), joining up on Oakland Avenue, to terminate at the Shorewood / Milwaukee boundary line.

Now let's imagine that the line would continue up Oakland Avenue, through Shorewood to Hampton, then west Santa Monica, north to Silver Spring, and then west on Silver Spring to Bayshore.

Since we are going to tear up Oakland Avenue anyway, wouldn't this be the ideal time to explore the Light Rail option ?

If the plan goes ahead as Michael Cudahy proposes, and the heavy infrastructure costs are covered by the Federal Money that he has identified, perhaps Shorewood can participate at not much more of a cost than including the rails in the Oakland Makeover. 

I would be willing to bet that  Mr. Cudahy and Mayor Barrett, would be very interested in working with Shorewood --- and perhaps our neighbors in Whitefish Bay and Glendale.

For Whitefish Bay and Shorewood, Light Rail would help their shopping districts compete with Bayshore ---  even as folks  ride the rail to Bayshore, they will have the opportunity to shop Shorewood and Bay's more boutique offerings along the way. 

For Glendale, it would make Bayshore a more viable destination for shoppers from the East Side and Downtown.

If we are serious about increasing Shorewood's residential appeal, and building up our retail markets, I believe Light Rail will do much more than our current plans for new street lights and garbage cans along Oakland and Capitol ---- or  artificial turf  and a second dome at the high school.

 

 

 

 


 
More Posts