|
By David Tatarowicz
Friday, Nov 21 2008, 11:24 AM
In a March 27, 2008 posting to my blog, I noted that the Sunrise Property was incorrectly assessed for value as "vacant" land, while it actually did --- and still does --- consist of land Plus "improvements" (buildings). Below is part of the posting detailing that the assessor dropped almost $600,000 of value from the property, which means all Shorewood taxpayers picked up the difference on their tax bills. Now that Sunrise is Sunset --- will the Village properly assess the parcel for its current market value --- as prescribed by State Law and Regulations ?
"The property at 3907-09 N Sherburn, which is one of the parcels for
the Sunrise Development that the Village Board is planning on funding
for $800,000 plus had a drastic change in assessment for 2007.
The assessment dropped $598,059 or about 21% of its former assessed
value. In addition, the assessor changed the property from a parcel
with improvements to vacant land --- even though there is still an
apartment building on the property.
When I questioned the Assessors Office as to why the new assessment
discounted the aparment building, I was told that the Assessor knew
there was an offer on the property, and that the new owners planned to
tear down the building and get TIF funding for a new project --- and
that the Assessor valued the property as though is was empty land,
based upon what might happen.
In fact, the property had an occupied apartment building and there was not even a closed sale on the property.
In checking with the WI Dept of Rev, they affirmed that the
assessment was done incorrectly, and that the property should have been
properly assessed with the improvements, and not as vacant land.
Future planned use has no affect on the present use and market value.
The almost $600,000 that the assessor dropped off the value of the
property means that all property owners in Shorewood pay more in taxes
to make up the difference." WHAT DO YOU THINK ? YOUR COMMENTS ARE WELCOME !
|
By David Tatarowicz
Monday, May 19 2008, 01:33 PM
According to the Greater Milwaukee Realtor Association, of which I am a member ---- sales in April in the Milwaukee Area were still down:
If this trend continues, it could affect the repayment of the TIF's the back the spending by the Village on various projects, as the cost of repayment could be spread to all property owners if the TIF properties do not appreciate in value.
County-by-county analysis
Milwaukee County: 646 units were sold in April; down -21.1% compared to 819 units sold in April 2007, and down -35.3% vs. 2006’s 998. 2,194 properties were listed in April compared to 2,373 in 2007 (-7.5%) and 2,070 in 2006 (6.0% increase). There are 420 pending sales in the county.
Waukesha County: 339 units were sold in April; down -20.4% compared to the 426 units sold in April 2007, and down -26.6% vs. 2006’s 463. 947 properties were listed in April compared to 1,030 in 2007 (-8.1%) and 1,038 in 2006 (-8.8%). There are 198 pending sales in Waukesha County.
Ozaukee County: 65 units were sold in April; down -20.7% compared to the 82 units sold in April 2007, and down -34.3% vs. 2006’s 99. 193 properties were listed in April compared to 248 in 2007 (-22.2%) and 184 in 2006 (4.9% increase). There are currently 48 pending sales in the county.
Washington County: 113 units were sold in April; down -31.9% compared to the 166 units sold in April 2007, and down -23.6% vs. 2006’s 148. 327 properties were listed in April compared to 363 in 2007 (-9.9%) and 273 in 2006 (19.8% increase). Washington County has 58 pending sales.
Racine County: 166 units were sold in April; down -23.5% compared to the 217 units sold in April 2007, and down -28.1% vs. 2006’s 231. 468 properties were listed in April compared to 499 in 2007 (-6.2%) and 502 in 2006 (-6.8%). There are 131 pending sales in the county.
Kenosha County: 144 units were sold in April; down -16.3% compared to the 172 units sold in April 2007, and down -32.1% vs. 2006’s 212. 475 properties were listed in April compared to 562 in 2007 (-15.5%) and 523 in 2006 (-9.2%). Kenosha County has 101 pending sales.
Walworth County: 75 units were sold in April; down -34.2% compared to the 114 units sold in April 2007, and down -48.6% vs. 2006’s 146. 430 properties were listed in April compared to 376 in 2007 (14.4% increase) and 355 in 2006 (21.1% increase). There are 44 pending sales in Walworth County.
|
By David Tatarowicz
Thursday, Mar 27 2008, 05:57 PM
I had noted in an earlier posting that a major TIF property had a questionable assessment.
The property at 3907-09 N Sherburn, which is one of the parcels for the Sunrise Development that the Village Board is planning on funding for $800,000 plus had a drastic change in assessment for 2007.
The assessment dropped $598,059 or about 21% of its former assessed value. In addition, the assessor changed the property from a parcel with improvements to vacant land --- even though there is still an apartment building on the property.
When I questioned the Assessors Office as to why the new assessment discounted the aparment building, I was told that the Assessor knew there was an offer on the property, and that the new owners planned to tear down the building and get TIF funding for a new project --- and that the Assessor valued the property as though is was empty land, based upon what might happen.
In fact, the property had an occupied apartment building and there was not even a closed sale on the property.
In checking with the WI Dept of Rev, they affirmed that the assessment was done incorrectly, and that the property should have been properly assessed with the improvements, and not as vacant land. Future planned use has no affect on the present use and market value.
The almost $600,000 that the assessor dropped off the value of the property means that all property owners in Shorewood pay more in taxes to make up the difference.
Also when the TIF district does their calculations on the increase of value on the property, they will have an extra cushion of $600,000 that will go to the TIF and not to the schools, county, MATC, etc ...... which again will be taxes shifted from that property to other property owners in Shorewood.
Following are the assessments for the Sherburn property for the past few years, applying the applicable State Equalizers:
Sherburn Land Improvements Total
2004 474,000 1,627,240 2,101,240
2005 507,900 2,250,282 2,758,182
2006 530,425 2,350,081 2,880,506
2007 2,282,447 00000000 2,282,447
This is a drop in the assessment of $598,059 which equals a 21% drop in value !!
HERE IS A COPY OF THE ACTUAL TAX REPORT THAT STEVE REQUESTED I POST
|
|
|
|
Full Report Property Location : 3907-3909 N Sherburn PL |
|
|
|
Taxed by: Village Of Shorewood |
|
Owner : |
Taxkey # 2758992002 |
|
|
Toohey John L & Barbara 16620 Woods Edge CT Brookfield, WI 53005-3548 |
Owner Occupied: Property Address : 3907-3909 N Sherburn PL Shorewood, WI 53211-1870 |
County: Milwaukee Taxed by: Village Of Shorewood Taxkey # 2758992002 |
|
|
|
|
|
Assessments |
|
|
Assessment Year |
Property Class |
Land Assessment |
Improvement Assessment |
Total Assessment |
Percent Of Change |
Acres |
Ratio |
|
|
|
2007 |
Commercial |
$ 2,275,600 |
|
$ 2,275,600 |
42.671 |
|
0.997760393 |
|
|
|
2006 |
Commercial |
$ 360,000 |
$ 1,235,000 |
$ 1,595,000 |
0.000 |
|
0.678759286 |
|
|
|
2005 |
Commercial |
$ 360,000 |
$ 1,235,000 |
$ 1,595,000 |
0.000 |
|
0.708868690 |
|
|
|
2004 |
Commercial |
$ 360,000 |
$ 1,235,000 |
$ 1,595,000 |
0.000 |
|
0.759208547 |
|
|
|
2003 |
Commercial |
$ 360,000 |
$ 1,235,000 |
$ 1,595,000 |
0.000 |
|
0.813959753 |
|
|
|
2002 |
Commercial |
$ 360,000 |
$ 1,235,000 |
$ 1,595,000 |
0.000 |
|
0.849216789 |
|
|
|
2001 |
Commercial |
$ 360,000 |
$ 1,235,000 |
$ 1,595,000 |
0.000 |
|
0.935897456 |
|
|
|
2000 |
Commercial |
$ 360,000 |
$ 1,235,000 |
$ 1,595,000 |
39.423 |
|
1.032343920 |
|
|
|
1999 |
Commercial |
$ 295,500 |
$ 848,500 |
$ 1,144,000 |
0.000 |
|
0.820232669 |
|
|
|
1998 |
Commercial |
$ 295,500 |
$ 848,500 |
$ 1,144,000 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
|
|
1997 |
Commercial |
$ 295,500 |
$ 848,500 |
$ 1,144,000 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
|
|
1996 |
Commercial |
$ 295,500 |
$ 848,500 |
$ 1,144,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Year |
Tax Before Lottery Credit |
Lottery Credit |
Tax After Lottery Credit |
Special Taxes |
Special Assessment |
Special Charges |
Full Pay Amount |
Ratio |
|
2007 |
$53,389.56 |
|
$53,389.56 |
|
|
|
$53,389.56 |
0.997760393 |
|
2006 |
$53,853.11 |
|
$53,853.11 |
|
|
|
$53,853.11 |
0.678759286 |
|
2005 |
$52,997.66 |
|
$52,997.66 |
|
|
|
$52,997.66 |
0.708868690 |
|
2004 |
$53,832.28 |
|
$53,832.28 |
|
|
|
$53,832.28 |
0.759208547 |
|
2003 |
$53,059.26 |
|
$53,059.26 |
|
|
|
$53,059.26 |
0.813959753 |
|
2002 |
$51,306.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.849216789 |
|
2001 |
$47,507.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.935897456 |
|
2000 |
$44,840.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.032343920 |
|
1999 |
$41,988.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.820232669 |
|
1998 |
$41,760.54 |
$70.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1997 |
$42,445.56 |
$111.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1996 |
$42,242.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assessor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Building Square Feet : |
|
Year Built : |
|
Township : |
7N |
|
Bedrooms : |
|
Year Remodeled : |
|
Range : |
22E |
|
Full Baths : |
|
Effective Year Built : |
|
Section : |
9 |
|
Half Baths : |
|
Air Conditioning : |
|
Quarter : |
|
|
Total Rooms : |
|
Fireplace : |
|
Pool : |
|
|
Number of Stories : |
|
Number of Units : |
|
Attic : |
|
|
Building Type : |
|
Basement : |
|
|
Exterior Wall : |
|
Heat : |
|
|
Exterior Condition : |
|
Garage : |
|
|
Land Use : |
|
School District : |
5355 Shorewood School District |
|
Zoning : |
|
Historic Designation : |
|
|
|
|
Legal Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lands In Ne 1/4 Sec 9-7-22 Com 92.12' Sely Of Intersec Of S Li Of E Capitol DR &... |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
WHAT DO YOU THINK? YOUR COMMENTS ARE APPRECIATED !
|
By David Tatarowicz
Wednesday, Mar 26 2008, 02:23 PM
The current Shorewood Village Board is spending some big dollars and planning to spend more, and gambling that increasing property values will pay the bill.
Shorewood is using what is called a TIF (tax incremental financing) as a Financing Tool to pay for various projects, such as Streetscaping, the River Project, Condo Development, etc.
According to the information published by the Wisconsin Dept of Revenue, a TIF works like this:
"Tax Incremental Finance, or TIF, is a financing tool that allows municipalities to invest in infrastructure and other improvements, and pay for these investments by capturing
property tax revenue from the newly developed property. An area is identified (the tax
incremental district, or TID) as appropriate for a certain type of development, and
projects are identified to encourage and facilitate the desired development. Then as
property values rise, the property tax paid on that private development is used by the
municipality to pay for the projects."
There is a risk though, that IF property values Decline, rather than Increase --- All the Property Tax Payers will pay for the expenditures through Increased Property Taxes, as explained here by the Dept of Rev:
" Municipalities can invest significant amounts of money into these infrastructure
improvements in hopes that growth will follow (sometimes called the "build it, and
they will come" strategy). However, if little or no private development occurs after the
improvements are made, there may be no tax increment revenue with which to pay for
the investment. If there is no increment revenue, the bonds used to pay for the
improvements will have to be paid for with general tax revenue. Paying for these bonds without a larger tax base means a higher tax burden. Another risk of over-investing can be that the site is improved, but the improvements actually prevent some types of development from being able to use the site."
The Big Question now becomes --- are Shorewood Property Values Increasing or Decreasing ?
There are many different ways to calculate the values, and with the current volatile real estate market --- it is anybody's guess of what the values will be by the end of the current year. The basic method of calculating property values, involves what is termed "Market Value", and changes in what the sales prices are in comparison between two comparable time periods. (Other methods of valuation, "replacement" and "income" are not commonly used for residential property appraisals or assessments).
Taking a snapshot of Single Family Home sales in Shorewood for the time period of January 1st of this year (2008) to date, compared with the same time period for last year (2007), there is a notable trend:
JANUARY 1 TO MARCH 26, 2007 --- SINGLE FAMILY HOMES SOLD IN SHOREWOOD (17 sales)
ORIGINAL ASKING PRICE DAYS ON MARKET SALES PRICE
189,900 24 192,100
214,900 169 180,000
224,900 114 215,000
230,000 16 221,500
259,900 126 235,000
289,900 183 237,000
289,000 13 289,000
298,000 46 298,100
329,900 99 295,000
309,000 20 310,000
320,000 45 320,000
339,000 42 335,000
364,900 43 356,000
387,900 68 350,000
449,000 10 460,000
749,000 18 750,000
1,495,000 62 1,425,000
Tot 6,740,200 1098 6,468,700
Avg 396,482 65 380,511
THERE WAS APPROX A 4% DECREASE BETWEEN ORIG PRICE AND SALES PRICE
JANUARY 1 TO MARCH 26, 2008 --- SINGLE FAMILY HOMES SOLD IN SHOREWOOD (9 sales)
ORIGINAL ASKING PRICE DAYS ON MARKET SALES PRICE
279,000 112 237,000
314,900 146 290,000
399,900 141 300,000
415,000 181 376,500
424,900 172 417,000
479,900 91 449,000
589,900 88 555,000
599,900 31 560,000
1,349,000 204 1,000,000
Tot 4,852,400 1166 4,184,500
Avg 539,155 130 464,944
THERE WAS APPROX A 13% DECREASE BETWEEN ORIG PRICE AND SALES PRICE, AND DAYS ON MARKET DOUBLED OVER THE PREVIOUS YEAR.
WHAT DO YOU THINK ? YOUR COMMENTS ARE APPRECIATED !
|
By David Tatarowicz
Tuesday, Mar 4 2008, 01:53 PM
According to property tax information available on the internet, the property at 3907-09 N Sherburn, which is one of the parcels for the Sunrise Development that the Village Board is planning on funding for $800,000 plus has changed dramatically for 2007.
The past assessments for the Sherburn property had a separate assessment for the land and a separate assessment for the improvements (buildings) which is the normal breakdown, and is the way that the property at 1111 E Capitol (Riverbrook Restaurant) is assessed.
Following are the assessments for the Sherburn property for the past few years, applying the applicable State Equalizers:
Sherburn Land Improvements Total
2004 474,000 1,627,240 2,101,240
2005 507,900 2,250,282 2,758,182
2006 530,425 2,350,081 2,880,506
2007 2,282,447 00000000 2,282,447
This is a drop in the assessment of $598,059 which equals a 21% drop in value !!
(note: the 1111 E Capitol Dr property had a decrease in its assessment of about 4%)
-
Is this the only property in Shorewood that has dropped in value by 21% ?
-
Why is the assessment no longer broken down into its parts ?
-
What implications does this have for the proposed Sunrise Development ?
-
Inquiring Minds Want to Know !!
Do you Know ? Do you have any Comments ?
|
More Posts
|
|