|
By David Tatarowicz
Wednesday, Mar 26 2008, 02:23 PM
The current Shorewood Village Board is spending some big dollars and planning to spend more, and gambling that increasing property values will pay the bill.
Shorewood is using what is called a TIF (tax incremental financing) as a Financing Tool to pay for various projects, such as Streetscaping, the River Project, Condo Development, etc.
According to the information published by the Wisconsin Dept of Revenue, a TIF works like this:
"Tax Incremental Finance, or TIF, is a financing tool that allows municipalities to invest in infrastructure and other improvements, and pay for these investments by capturing
property tax revenue from the newly developed property. An area is identified (the tax
incremental district, or TID) as appropriate for a certain type of development, and
projects are identified to encourage and facilitate the desired development. Then as
property values rise, the property tax paid on that private development is used by the
municipality to pay for the projects."
There is a risk though, that IF property values Decline, rather than Increase --- All the Property Tax Payers will pay for the expenditures through Increased Property Taxes, as explained here by the Dept of Rev:
" Municipalities can invest significant amounts of money into these infrastructure
improvements in hopes that growth will follow (sometimes called the "build it, and
they will come" strategy). However, if little or no private development occurs after the
improvements are made, there may be no tax increment revenue with which to pay for
the investment. If there is no increment revenue, the bonds used to pay for the
improvements will have to be paid for with general tax revenue. Paying for these bonds without a larger tax base means a higher tax burden. Another risk of over-investing can be that the site is improved, but the improvements actually prevent some types of development from being able to use the site."
The Big Question now becomes --- are Shorewood Property Values Increasing or Decreasing ?
There are many different ways to calculate the values, and with the current volatile real estate market --- it is anybody's guess of what the values will be by the end of the current year. The basic method of calculating property values, involves what is termed "Market Value", and changes in what the sales prices are in comparison between two comparable time periods. (Other methods of valuation, "replacement" and "income" are not commonly used for residential property appraisals or assessments).
Taking a snapshot of Single Family Home sales in Shorewood for the time period of January 1st of this year (2008) to date, compared with the same time period for last year (2007), there is a notable trend:
JANUARY 1 TO MARCH 26, 2007 --- SINGLE FAMILY HOMES SOLD IN SHOREWOOD (17 sales)
ORIGINAL ASKING PRICE DAYS ON MARKET SALES PRICE
189,900 24 192,100
214,900 169 180,000
224,900 114 215,000
230,000 16 221,500
259,900 126 235,000
289,900 183 237,000
289,000 13 289,000
298,000 46 298,100
329,900 99 295,000
309,000 20 310,000
320,000 45 320,000
339,000 42 335,000
364,900 43 356,000
387,900 68 350,000
449,000 10 460,000
749,000 18 750,000
1,495,000 62 1,425,000
Tot 6,740,200 1098 6,468,700
Avg 396,482 65 380,511
THERE WAS APPROX A 4% DECREASE BETWEEN ORIG PRICE AND SALES PRICE
JANUARY 1 TO MARCH 26, 2008 --- SINGLE FAMILY HOMES SOLD IN SHOREWOOD (9 sales)
ORIGINAL ASKING PRICE DAYS ON MARKET SALES PRICE
279,000 112 237,000
314,900 146 290,000
399,900 141 300,000
415,000 181 376,500
424,900 172 417,000
479,900 91 449,000
589,900 88 555,000
599,900 31 560,000
1,349,000 204 1,000,000
Tot 4,852,400 1166 4,184,500
Avg 539,155 130 464,944
THERE WAS APPROX A 13% DECREASE BETWEEN ORIG PRICE AND SALES PRICE, AND DAYS ON MARKET DOUBLED OVER THE PREVIOUS YEAR.
WHAT DO YOU THINK ? YOUR COMMENTS ARE APPRECIATED !
|
By David Tatarowicz
Tuesday, Dec 18 2007, 04:53 PM
I would love a 320% ROI !!!
I am sure that any investor would love to get that kind of Return On Investment --- but I doubt that even Warren Buffet would count those kinds of chickens before they are hatched.
The Community Development Authority is sponsoring a Facade Grant of $800,000 for the apartment building at 3575 N. Oakland. According to a story in www.shorewoodnow.com by Marie Rohde:
The building is currently assessed at $3.5 million.
The CDA says the facade improvements will increase the value of the building by $2.256 million and boost neighboring properties by $305,000.
Doing the math, $800,000 invested with a return of increased value of $2,561,000 is a ROI of 320%.
As a real estate broker, I have been involved in many transactions involving renovation, with single family and multi family properties. I have never heard of anyone getting that kind of ROI with just a new facade ....
I would certainly like to see a Certified Appraisal of both the value of the building as is, and the value of the building after the facade improvements. Due to the uniqueness and complexity of this project, such an appraisal would be mostly in narrative, and it would be interesting to see the rationale the appraiser used, and the comps that justify the conclusion.
As a very imperfect comparison (once again considering the uniqueness and complexity of the project) I have printed below the kind of return on investment a homeowner would expect for various renovations.
This is somewhat "apples to oranges" -- but note that on average, no project even pays back the cost !! The returns are all less than 100%.
You can find a number of similar charts and comparisons on the internet --- potential Seller are always interested in ways they can sell their property for a higher price.
Just for fun --- let's pretend that a 320% ROI is doable on this project --- and can be substantiated to the satisfaction of investors/bankers/etc ------- then why does the Village have to finance the project ? If it is for real --- drop a dime, call Warren Buffet --- those are the kinds of numbers that would probably get his attention.
What's YOUR TAKE --- please leave your comments below.
|
Description Of Remodeling Work |
Job Cost |
Resale Value |
Cost Recouped |
| Minor Kitchen Remodel
Replace cabinet dooors, oven and cooktop, laminate countertops, sink, faucet and floor, repaint |
$8,507 |
$8,030 |
94% |
| Bathroom addition
Add a second bath to a house with 1 or 1.5 baths;include ceramic tile and linen closet |
11,645 |
10,593 |
91 |
| Major Kitchen Remodel
Redesign kitchen, replacing all of the above, plus built in microwave, custom lighting, island. |
21,262 |
19,190 |
90 |
| Master Suite
In a house with 2-3 bedrooms, add a 24-foot by 16-foot master suite with walk-in closet, whirlpool tub, separate shower. |
36,472 |
30,530 |
84 |
| Attic Bedroom
In a 2-3 bedroom house, convert unfinished attic space with bedroom and shower/bath. |
22,840 |
19,084 |
84 |
| Two-Story Addition
First-floor family room and second floor bedroom with full bath. |
55,687 |
46,236 |
83 |
| Family Room Addition
Add a 16- by 25-foot room with skylights, hardwood tongue-and-groove floor, fireplace. |
31,846 |
26,483 |
83 |
| Bathroom Remodel
Update existing bath with new tub, toilet, vanity, medicine cabinet, lighting, tile. |
8,423 |
6,480 |
77 |
| Replace Windows
10 new 3'x5' aluminum-clad windows with trim. |
6,112 |
4,536 |
74 |
| Replace Siding
1,250 square feet of new vinyl or aluminum siding and trim. |
5,458 |
3,983 |
73 |
| Deck Addition
16'x20' deck of pressure-treated pine including built-in-bench, railings and planter. |
6,172 |
4,459 |
72 |
| Home Office
Convert existing room into office with custom cabinetry and re-wiring for electronic equipment |
8,103 |
5,423 |
67 |
| Source: Remodeling magazine, 1996-1997 Cost vs. Value Report. |
|
More Posts
|
|