MyCommunityNOW.com
Blog Home |  Email Author  |        Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

This Just In...

Kevin Fischer is an award-winning veteran broadcaster who has been seen and heard on Milwaukee TV and radio stations for nearly three decades.
Kevin, who is a legislative aide to state Sen. Mary Lazich (R-New Berlin), can be seen offering his views on the news on the public affairs program, “INTERchange,” on Milwaukee Public Television Channel 10. He lives with his wife, Jennifer, in Franklin.

God bless President Bush

By Kevin Fischer
Monday, Jan 28 2008, 09:12 PM
Great moments from the President’s State of the Union Address tonight…

ON TAXES:

Unless the Congress acts, most of the tax relief we have delivered over the past 7 years will be taken away. Some in Washington argue that letting tax relief expire is not a tax increase. Try explaining that to 116 million American taxpayers who would see their taxes rise by an average of $1,800. Others have said they would personally be happy to pay higher taxes. I welcome their enthusiasm, and I am pleased to report that the IRS accepts both checks and money orders.

Most Americans think their taxes are high enough. With all the other pressures on their finances, American families should not have to worry about the Federal Government taking a bigger bite out of their paychecks. There is only one way to eliminate this uncertainty: make the tax relief permanent. And Members of Congress should know: If any bill raising taxes reaches my desk, I will veto it.

Just as we trust Americans with their own money, we need to earn their trust by spending their tax dollars wisely. Next week, I will send you a budget that terminates or substantially reduces 151 wasteful or bloated programs totaling more than $18 billion. And this budget will keep America on track for a surplus in 2012. American families have to balance their budgets, and so should their Government.

The people's trust in their Government is undermined by congressional earmarks -- special interest projects that are often snuck in at the last minute, without discussion or debate.

Last year, I asked you to voluntarily cut the number and cost of earmarks in half. I also asked you to stop slipping earmarks into committee reports that never even come to a vote.

Unfortunately, neither goal was met. So this time, if you send me an appropriations bill that does not cut the number and cost of earmarks in half, I will send it back to you with my veto. And tomorrow, I will issue an Executive Order that directs Federal agencies to ignore any future earmark that is not voted on by the Congress. If these items are truly worth funding, the Congress should debate them in the open and hold a public vote.


ON THE WAR AGAINST TERROR:

Since September 11, we have taken the fight to these terrorists and extremists. We will stay on the offense, we will keep up the pressure, and we will deliver justice to the enemies of America.

While the enemy is still dangerous and more work remains, the American and Iraqi surges have achieved results few of us could have imagined just 1 year ago.

When we met last year, many said containing the violence was impossible. A year later, high profile terrorist attacks are down, civilian deaths are down, and sectarian killings are down.

When we met last year, militia extremists -- some armed and trained by Iran -- were wreaking havoc in large areas of Iraq. A year later, Coalition and Iraqi forces have killed or captured hundreds of militia fighters. And Iraqis of all backgrounds increasingly realize that defeating these militia fighters is critical to the future of their country.

When we met last year, al Qaida had sanctuaries in many areas of Iraq, and their leaders had just offered American forces safe passage out of the country. Today, it is al Qaida that is searching for safe passage. They have been driven from many of the strongholds they once held, and over the past year, we have captured or killed thousands of extremists in Iraq, including hundreds of key al Qaida leaders and operatives. Last month, Osama bin Laden released a tape in which he railed against Iraqi tribal leaders who have turned on al Qaida and admitted that Coalition forces are growing stronger in Iraq. Ladies and gentlemen, some may deny the surge is working, but among the terrorists there is no doubt. Al Qaida is on the run in Iraq, and this enemy will be defeated.

When we met last year, our troop levels in Iraq were on the rise. Today, because of the progress just described, we are implementing a policy of "return on success," and the surge forces we sent to Iraq are beginning to come home.

This progress is a credit to the valor of our troops and the brilliance of their commanders. This evening, I want to speak directly to our men and women on the frontlines. Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, and Coast Guardsmen: In the past year, you have done everything we have asked of you, and more. Our Nation is grateful for your courage. We are proud of your accomplishments. And tonight in this hallowed chamber, with the American people as our witness, we make you a solemn pledge: In the fight ahead, you will have all you need to protect our Nation. And I ask the Congress to meet its responsibilities to these brave men and women by fully funding our troops.

Comments

Janet Evans   

If there is one quality about President Bush that is admirable, it is that he is steadfast.  

I have felt safe with him as our President.  No matter how much Bush-haters want to criticize him...I don't know how any of them could deny they feel safe.  

And he is compassionate, straight from his heart.  

January 28, 2008 9:34 PM

Kevin Fischer   

Think about it...Hillary Clinton, Commander in Chief of our Armed Forces.

A terrorist's dream.

January 28, 2008 10:13 PM

Janet Evans   

And our Nation's nightmare.

January 28, 2008 10:28 PM

Karen123   

I'll take "W' for another four years - thank you very much.

My favorite part of the speech was when he told people who think taxes aren't high enough that they can send a check or money order to the Dept. of Revenue.  

I have a better idea... how about those tax and spenders just send back their tax rebate.  

January 28, 2008 10:32 PM

Kevin Fischer   

Karen, those people are the first to moan and gripe about this President.

They'll be the first to cash their checks...and still b**ch about it.

January 28, 2008 10:35 PM

J. Strupp   

This is a President who couldn't find his veto pen on new spending bill for the better part of the last 7 years.  Yet, here in his final days, he stands in front of Congress and the American people and tells them that he will do everything in his power to reduce wasteful spending and promises to veto any bill that doesn't cut earmarks by half and the conservative base eats it up?  Yet the Governor of Wisconsin, who is equally as comfortable spending away our taxpayer dollars, stands in front of Congress and Wisconsin residents and tells us he's going to hold the line on taxes and he is chastised and ridiculed by those same "conservatives".  Seems to be a rather "selective" way of looking at things.  We always want to talk about "track record on the issues" these days but only if and when it suits us.  

"If there is one quality about President Bush that is admirable, it is that he is steadfast."

That sentence just speaks for itself.      

January 28, 2008 10:50 PM

J. Strupp   

His 29% approval rating probably wouldn't get him another 4 years even if it could Karen.  Sorry to break it to you.  

January 28, 2008 10:54 PM

Kevin Fischer   

I don't decide who to vote for or how I stand on the issues based on the morning's USA TODAY poll, the way George Bush's predecessor did.

The fact is President Bush is head and shoulders above any Presidential candidate that is still in the race.

January 28, 2008 10:59 PM

Kevin Fischer   

Also, to bring Governor Doyle into this discussion is preposterous.

He has broken promises so many times about taxes and spending it's a joke when he now says he's going to hold the line.

Does anyone with an ounce of common sense believe him?

January 28, 2008 11:01 PM

J. Strupp   

I don't think the point of my comment was Governor Doyle's credibility.  

January 28, 2008 11:16 PM

Kevin Fischer   

Then why bring him/that up?

January 28, 2008 11:20 PM

Janet Evans   

Josh,

I can't think of one blog post ever made, where you commented and didn't twist either the blog wording or someone's comments to suit your own purpose, OR, you totally avoided the main content of the blog and twisted that to suit your purpose too.  Just like you are doing here.

Every time.

My steadfast comment was not about taxes or overspending, which I know you abhor, it was our President's convictions.

I suppose you will end your whole conversation here tonight with something about you being sarcastic.

January 28, 2008 11:34 PM

Cindy   

Any surprise J Strupp is the only outsider that tries to comment?

January 29, 2008 7:51 AM

Becky   

Josh Strupp's knowledge and incise commentary is wasted here. None of the Bush faithful here are able to rise to his level and actually debate the issues on a meaningful level.

Steadfast? History will judge Bush as merely OBSTINATE. In fact, his own father has reason to feel that way about GW, who repeatedly rejected his advice to disastrous consequences.

A disastrous presidency.  

January 29, 2008 7:52 AM

Karen123   

All I can say is that is was such a nice change of pace to hear the President speak for an hour about the accomplishments and good things that are happening in our nation and abroad.  The other 364 days of the year we get Bush -bashing, "Bush Lied, People Died" doom and gloom from our Bush hating media.  

Conservatives have been plenty critical of Bush's spending practices, this year he put his foot down, and Josh, I believe your buddies on the left side of the chamber stood and applauded with him when he called for the end of ear marks.

As far as approval ratings, they mean nothing.  There is a poster that I often see hanging in classrooms all over the place that says,

"It's not always popular to do what is right, and it is not always right to what is popular."

What a change of pace from our last President.

January 29, 2008 9:28 AM

Janet Evans   

Bush Senior has always stood behind his son.  He has stated that publicly, in our country and while he is visiting other countries.  

Our President is not required to take advice from his father.  Nor any other former President.  

George W. Bush has a fine legacy.  He is steadfast in fighting for freedom.  Our country has helped to free millions of oppressed people.  We are fighting to keep our country safe from terror.  You can sleep better at night because of George W. Bush.

January 29, 2008 11:33 AM

J. Strupp   

Kevin,

My analogy is clear.  If you don't want to speak to the obvious double-standard I wrote about, that's fine, but I think you understand full well my commentary from last night.

Janet, I simply said that your steadfast comment spoke for itself.  I didn't twist anything.

Regarding that legacy you speak of, I believe that President Bush's legacy will hinge on Iraq and Iraq alone.  It is possible that the situation in Iraq will improve enough in the next decade to vindicate Bush and his administration somewhat.  Until then, his legacy will be somewhere between, "the President who could have, but didn't" and "the crusader neo-con who led the rise and fall of an American political ideology".  Most likely, the administration's track record on big government spending, seriously unqualified appointments to posts like FEMA and the Supreme Court, outing of CIA operatives for polical vendettas, a perscription drug entitlement program that even the former Fed Chairman mocks, failure on Social Security reform, misguided war on terror, etc. will be buried as an afterthought over time.  President Bush will be remembered for his war in Iraq.  Maybe history is more kind to him over the years.  Judging by what we've seen in the last 7 years, I wouldn't bet on it.    

January 29, 2008 12:29 PM

Becky   

Janet, if my father was the leader of a country that led a coalition of armed forces into the very country that I'm about to attack and occupy, I think I would sit down with him and his advisers and give them my full, undivided attention.

George W. Bush did not, and will not. And now thousands of soldiers and noncombatants - men, women and children - are paying for it with lives and limbs.

"Bush Senior has always stood behind his son.  He has stated that publicly, in our country and while he is visiting other countries."

Well, I certainly hope so - and how precious that you believe that is meaningful in any way. What kind of father (or public figure) would come out and admit, "My adviser Brent Scowcroft prepared a detailed memo on Iraq issues for my son and my son threw it back into my face"? Yet, that's what happened.

DISASTROUS presidency.

January 29, 2008 1:38 PM

Karen123   

Hey Strupp, based on a previos blog conversation we had the other day, care to place a friendly wager on the outcome of the Florida primary?

You seem to "like" McCain, I can't stand him.  We've debated here and on my blog, how and why he has the momentum he has.  How about if McCain wins, I will come on this blog and write three nice things about your favorite Democratic President or candidate.  If Romney wins, you have to come on here and write three nice things about George W. Bush?

What do you say Strupp?  Can you stomach that?

January 29, 2008 2:15 PM

J. Strupp   

Hey Taubenheim,

Sure.  But I'm not a democrat so I'll have to find the democratic president that a like most.  Or how about this, when McCain wins you have to directly address 3 of the blunders our President has made in the last 7 years, which I've stated above?  

I almost thought we made a breakthrough a few comments ago Karen.  For a second there I thought you were going to start calling me by my first name.  

January 29, 2008 3:23 PM

Karen123   

Not a democrat?  Really?  

As far as the blunders, I'm not sure what you want me to say, I'll wait till the results are in tonight or tomorrow and ask you again then, only if McCain wins.  Ok, JOSH?!  (Seriously, I always forget if it is John or Josh, I only called you Josh earlier because someone before that used your name.  Josh it is.)

January 29, 2008 3:33 PM

Mr. Anonymous   

From a veteran’s perspective, I’d have to say that I would have been proud to serve under George W. Bush as Commander in Chief. It was a complete and utter embarrassment to have to serve under Clinton - a man that did more damage to our military than any enemy ever could have hoped to have wrought upon us. Although he abused and frowned down upon the military, he also tried to abuse his power as Commander in Chief when he managed to get himself into some legal trouble. The military was more of a toy for Clinton than anything else. There was no public outrage when he made a half-hearted attack on Iraq for their lack of compliance. There was no public outrage over Bosnia. Why did he get off so lightly? What did he do to make America a better country? When I was in the Navy and Clinton was running for his second term, he asked the question, “Are you better off than you were 4 years ago?”. The definitive answer from every member of our armed forces was a resounding “NO!”

January 29, 2008 4:03 PM

Janet Evans   

I hardly call Operation Desert Storm a war on the same level as what we are involved in now.  And President George H.W. Bush should have taken care of Saddam back then.

Exactly where are you getting your "quote' from?  And so what.  As I said, I can give you quotes where he supports George W. Bush.  The President is the Commander In Chief.

"George W. Bush did not, and will not. And now thousands of soldiers and noncombatants - men, women and children - are paying for it with lives and limbs."

Oh, so because he didn't take his "father's advice, you make that statement?  You are misguided.

____________________

Mr. A :)

Thank you for your service to our country!

I certainly appreciate it.  YOU are a hero in that respect and in the way you conduct your life as a citizen now - those of us who know you are aware of that!

January 29, 2008 5:09 PM

Karen123   

Josh, I'm here to pay up. Da*m!  We need Huck-a-wanna-be to get out so this can be a two man race and see where the chips fall.

Anyway, 3 blunders from your list above...

1. In your opinion, poor appointment to FEMA.  I have written in the past that the Hurricane Katrina mess is 75% the blame of the governor and local officials like mayor.  This all happened a while ago, So I don't really recall all the details, but I beleieve that the whole country knew that storm was coming, evacuation orders were given, it was the role of Mayor and Governor to execute the plans that were in place to use use school busses to get people out.  Once people defied those orders and stayed in their homes, they complianed that it took too long to get them out.  At this point, the Feds should have and eventually did come in and manage the situation that should have been done locally.  The appointment to the FEMA post may or may not have been qualified, but this storm was like no other that had ever hit.  Hindsight is 20/20.

2. Supreme Court Appt.  I absolutly 100% agree with and support his choice for Supreme Court.   Nothing to address here.

3. Social Security Reform.  It wasn't for lack of trying.  His plan to privitize it had a lot of potential, but the liberals scared the American people and the conservatives got gun shy.  AH yes, democracy at work.

Thank goodness I didn't have to write about affairs, sexual misconduct, lying under oath, etc. etc. etc. etc. et. etc.  

January 30, 2008 1:49 PM

This Just In...   

As I post every Sunday, here are the top five most popular of my blog entries from the previous week

February 3, 2008 8:04 AM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.